Home » The kidnapping plot against Governor Whitmer – more evidence that it was entrapment all along

Comments

The kidnapping plot against Governor Whitmer – more evidence that it was entrapment all along — 22 Comments

  1. For me one of the most really shocking parts about all this is this is actually being reported by Buzzfeed(!)… pretty much the very last place I’d expect to see actual Real Journalism going on.

  2. There is some evidence that January 6 was partly naivete by Trump supporters with a significant role by agents provocateur and the FBI may well have had a role in the organization. I doubt we will learn the truth unless this regime is ousted.

  3. Anyone else read the part of the Buzzfeed article where the informant described going to a protest at the Michigan capitol? He reported to his FBI contacts that the people he was with might get violent. A few minutes later the security guards opened up the capitol building and let all the protestors (including those who were armed) inside to wander around the building. And several news photographers were following the informant’s group. Interesting set of events

  4. Baltimoron, even the leftwing author said that it was a “surprising thing” that they opened the doors of the capitol right after the informant made contact with the FBI and told them his rubes looked violent. Not so surprising if the FBI’s whole plan was hoping that the rubes would engage in a shootout with the police in an otherwise evacuated building. Instead all that happened was some banging on Whitmer’s empty office’s door. Sounds like the FBI already had the plan for January 6th ready to go months before, and were hoping for gunfire and violence, but instead got tresspassing and a few broken windows, which was still enough to portray as the “worst tragedy in American history”

    When you see the disconnect between what reportedly went on on January 6th and how the Democrats and media portray it, it was almost as if they had a prewritten script for the aftermath and stuck with it word for word despite the actual events of the day. You can best believe they wouldn’t be hiding all the ample video of the day if they got the violence from the protestors that they hoped for. Instead the video, if produced, would show the malfeasance of their actors.

  5. “…pre-written script…”

    Yep. That’s how it works. (Though it looks like “fire-extinguisher man” was MIA. Or developed cold feet. Or couldn’t find the damn fire extinguisher…unless he was indeed there and brandishing his vorpal canister like Excalibur. No matter. His role, symbolic but vital, is now enshrined in the national mythology….)

    As far as “injur[ing] democracy”(heh!) goes, I guess stealing elections just doesn’t count…as long as it’s a Democratic Party cabal that does the stealing, in which case it is referred to as “nurturing democracy” or—even better—“protecting democracy from those who would destroy it”, etc., etc., “ad infinitum”, “ad nauseum”….

  6. The FBI’s politization is a clear and present danger to national security. So too for every politicized federal agency.

  7. Shutting down the Senate and threatening the Supreme Court during the Kavanaugh hearings weren’t “injuring democracy” because those were the right kind of delinquents.

    Remember the jihadist who drove to the Muhammad cartoon seminar in Texas to shoot the participants, trailed by an FBI agent who did nothing to stop him? How much of that was incitement?

  8. Indeed. Isn’t almost axiomatic now that the one person in the counter-culture discussion group urging violence … is, in fact, a government agent?
    Yeah, I was around in the 60s, 70s and 80s. I remember the joke about the percentage of government agents present at KKK meetings. The current cartoon about his encapsulates that very nicely: six stick figures, four are informants, one is a government law enforcement agent, and the sixth is a disaffected incel who thinks he has friends now …

  9. There’s an old joke that there are only 10,000 KKK members anymore (the number varies) and half of them work for the FBI. If you get the agency’s money, there would be a great incentive to make it seem like you’re worth what you’re paid by making sure that whatever group you’ve infiltrated does something illegal. This apart from the ideological bias the agency has developed that would encourage going after the right the way they’d never consider going after the left.

  10. But in all seriousness…
    This is how you get a real insurrection & real violence designed to restore the US to its footings & foundations in God-given liberty.

    And woe betide if we ever bring back genuine blasphemy laws.

  11. The FBI and some other agencies didn’t become like this yesterday. That’s not news to anyone reading this blog, sure. But it’s slowly dawning on Normie. Not all Normies. Some are always unreachable. Just Cattle (heh).

    (While it’s not news to most of us here, there’s value in gradual reinforcement and in one’s vision becoming clearer. A good exercise for some readers would be to think back to Vietnam and then the Middle-Eastern Forever Wars — easier on your operant conditioning if you focus at first on Gulf War 2 and work backwards — you’ll probably end up with the sneaking suspicion that you’ve been manipulated and lied to before — I know I was fooled more than once.)

    The larger question is does it even matter what Noticing Normie thinks? Could Normie be Normie if he/she were capable of that thing we call Thought? All that matters is that Normie follows *your* preference cascade rather than *their* preference cascade.

    Our enemies have a hundred-plus year head start in moving the needle. Where do we even begin?

  12. Decades ago, I knew of a couple of guys who practiced running through the woods with guns on account of something like this happening. They expected it.

  13. It’s becoming axiomatic that “if you have government you have corruption,” with, usually, Chicago being the long serving poster child.

    A) There are people who are fundamentally corrupt, and they are attracted to government because of the opportunities for power and funding.

    B) Government itself, because of the power and money it controls, creates corrupt people.

    I do not know which is true, or is there is another, or several more, categories I’m missing. I am wondering, though, what happens to the army of corruptees in government if we succeed in drastically reducing the size of government. Roaches zoom back into the woodwork when the light is turned on; where will all the currently corrupt go when government agencies are abolished or severely downsized?

  14. The FBI and CIA needs abolished and those people need to get a job in the real world.

    The behavior of the FBI in particular over the last four years has persuaded me that dissolving the agency and starting from scratch (with current employees blackballed if they were in line positions) might yield better results than attempting to fix it.

  15. People say that the FBI field agents are good guys. No, they follow orders to prevent having their pension taken away when they are canned for having integrity. Notice there have been very few leaks about FBI illegalities. They need to be canned for violating their oath.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>