Home » Glenn Greenwald on the suppression of liberties in the name of fighting terror

Comments

Glenn Greenwald on the suppression of liberties in the name of fighting terror — 20 Comments

  1. Greenwald and Taibbi have been atypical among the chattering classes in that they have fixed principles.

  2. We now have a senile puppet calling “white supremacy” (i.e. conservatives, Trump-supporters, and traditional civic nationalists) the “most lethal threat” of all, citing the disgraceful fabrications of our over-funded and thoroughly corrupt “intel agencies”, while genuine political prisoners in our so-called republic are languishing in vile conditions in DC’s jail for the sole “crime” of trespassing at the Capitol on 1/6. Greenwald was correct, years ago, in criticizing the excesses of the surveillance state, and, to his credit, he is applying the same standard of judgement to the “soft totalitarianism” of the illegitimate Harris/Biden regime.

  3. To echo what was asked a few days ago: Will anyone of my liberal/D friends even hear about this, or even care???

    All of us here know of all this shit, and it doesn’t surprise us. But, until it makes it out into the general culture it matters not. And with Pravda (the MSM) protecting their buds, it won’t happen. Russia, Hunter, Hillary emails, Epstein, the list goes on and on…. I just can’t get excited and/or upset about any of this any more. To paraphrase an old TV show that used to open with: “they control the horizontal, they control the vertical”, they control the culture and thus the mind set of the populace; or at least 50% of it.

  4. The left’s criminal prosecution of Americans for strong disagreement with the left’s agenda will prove to be a suicidal strategy…

    It’s a level of stupidity that only ideological fanaticism could imagine will be successful.

    Everyone has a limit to what they’ll put up with and when governments repeatedly escalate injustices, one way or the other they’re living on borrowed time.

  5. ” Will anyone of my liberal/D friends even hear about this, or even care???”
    those with one sigma above the mean have heard and don’t care. the rest meh

  6. @avi:

    The up and coming Tech Oligarchy will have some table-waiting and book keeping jobs for 2-sigmas. One-sigmas are doing nicely in the present system if they are sufficiently sociopathic, but they’re going to be in for a shock when they find out that they’re surplus to requirements later.

  7. To echo what was asked a few days ago: Will anyone of my liberal/D friends even hear about this, or even care???

    I posted a link to the only LA Times story about the virus this morning. On Facebook. It was about the House minority leader attending his son’s wedding when he might have had the virus. NOT ONE WORD ABOUT Fauci’s emails.

  8. We have the refrain “Will anyone of my liberal/D friends even hear about this, or even care???” on a constant loop replay.

    Most of us can’t fathom how any group of people can continue to support politicians or other elites with a never-ending record of failure at providing anything approaching what normal people consider “good results” politically, economically, or socially.

    Daniel Pipes may have an explanation, which also covers the recurring question “Why does the Left support Islamic / Arabic countries, especially since they have “social values” that are antithetical to the “important” ones the Leftists profess?”

    It’s long and heavy on examples, but I think it delineates a mind-set, point-of-view, or whatever you want to call it that is shared by the Left (and their useful-Liberals) with the Islamic countries — the analysis is embedded in the examples, and is not easily excerptible.

    https://www.meforum.org/62395/arab-leaders-finesse-military-defeats

    When Saddam Hussein’s chief spokesman met with the U.S. secretary of state on the eve of the Kuwait War in January 1991, Tariq Aziz said something remarkable to James Baker. “Never,” an Iraqi transcript quotes him, “has [an Arab] political regime entered into a war with Israel or the United States and lost politically.”[1]

    Elie Salem, Lebanon’s foreign minister during most of the 1980s and a noted professor of politics, concurred:

    “The logic of victory and defeat does not fully apply in the Arab-Israeli context. In the wars with Israel, Arabs celebrated their defeats as if they were victories, and presidents and generals were better known for the cities and regions they had lost than for the ones they had liberated.”[2]

    They exaggerate slightly, for the loss to Israel in 1948-49 by the Syrian, Egyptian, Iraqi, and Jordanian armies did cost those regimes heavily with three of them falling and one barely surviving.[3] This exception aside, military loss usually does not damage defeated Arab rulers. Indeed, disaster on the battlefield can be politically useful, and not just against Israel or the United States but also in intra-Arab conflicts and with Iranians, Africans, or Europeans. In the sixty-five years since 1956, military losses have hardly ever scathed Arabic-speaking rulers and sometimes benefited them.

    The following analysis establishes this pattern through twenty-one examples, nineteen of them brief and two longer analyses, then explains it and draws a conclusion from it.[4]

    [conclusion]
    That defeated rulers can celebrate defeats invites moral hazard and renders them more aggressive. Why worry if a defeat and its terrible implications do not affect you? This pattern goes far to explain why the Middle East hosts so many wars. Money for arms is always abundant, the population’s suffering is irrelevant, the economic losses of little import, and the ruler can expect to survive unscathed. With the stakes so low, give war a chance and hope for the best.

  9. @AesopFan:

    Been cost-free to date. That fence in DC suggests though that they’re easily spooked.

    Problem with them being spooked is that when USGov acquires a fresh new Big Agenda, it rapidly turns into a multi-generational elephantine grift. And you don’t want to be ground underfoot by such an enormously profitable beast.

    If the thing doesn’t flash over in the next two or three years, it’s going to be a very long haul.

  10. }}} warning that the greatest national security threat the U.S now faces is domestic extremism…

    This IS true, but it ain’t the RIGHT’s extremism that is the threat.

    :-/

    I DID complain about the “Patriot Act” on the general basis of the fact that it made no real distinction between external actors and those of American descent, and would thus apply to “freedom fighters” such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson as much as it would apply to Osama Bin Laden.

    That concern was borne out when, six months after passage, it was revealed that the DoJ was giving LEOs seminars on “how to use the Patriot Act in their own casework”. Imagine my total and absolute lack of surprise >:-(

  11. The term “war on terror” has become thoroughly Orwellian, as those prosecuting it are acting as enemies of the United States in undermining fundamental freedoms in their aggressive pursuit of American patriots.

    How vast are the legions of enemy agents in our government? They appear to be well over half of the federal bureaucracy. At this moment, the Pentagon is aggressively purging itself of those committed to defending the nation and its founding values. Having successfully defrauded a national election, the pretenders are hastily consolidating their conquest via greater and greater amplifications of dishonesty.

    All of which has a negative karmic structure pointing in a negative direction. How negative? If the fraudsters had an inkling of where their chosen path leads, they would pray for forensic audits across the country to save them from their misdeeds. Regrettably, they are oversupplied with hatred, uninterested in truth, infatuated with the spoils of their deceit, and excited by what further theft will bring them.

  12. “Fear is crucial for state authority. When the population is filled with it, they will acquiesce to virtually any power the government seeks to acquire in the name of keeping them safe. But when fear is lacking, citizens will crave liberty more than control, and that is when they question official claims and actions. When that starts to happen, when the public feels too secure, institutions of authority will reflexively find new ways to ensure they stay engulfed by fear and thus quiescent.”

    To me, this is the money quote. I work for the USG as a diplomat. I suppose one could say that I swim in the Deep State’s fetid sewer, and have seen much of what Greenwald describes. To Neo everyone who comments on this blog I can assure you that 90% of my State Dept colleagues are more than happy to use their Top Secret clearances and insider knowledge to (at the least) silence you and make you understand your “place.” We receive cables and memos regularly meant to keep the fear (right now it’s mostly covid-related) levels high. And the Dept’s willingness to implement the Biden (Mal)Administration’s lies grows stronger, not weaker, the longer it is power.

  13. AesopFan,

    ““Never,” an Iraqi transcript quotes him, “has [an Arab] political regime entered into a war with Israel or the United States and lost politically.”

    Thats because America hasn’t fought to win a war since WWII. Nor Israel since 1948. To win a war you have to utterly destroy an enemy’s ability to ever wage war again.

    “To Neo [&] everyone who comments on this blog I can assure you that 90% of my State Dept colleagues are more than happy to use their Top Secret clearances and insider knowledge to (at the least) silence you and make you understand your “place.” Telemachus

    Sooner or later, fools playing with fire get burned.

  14. Telemachus,

    Though not a diplomat, I worked in contact with many U.S. Embassies around the world. In general (as you say, 90%) of the Foreign Service hold ordinary Americans in disdain.

    Of course, I should point out that this is mostly true of all the diplomatic services of world. This elitism is not unique to the U.S. Government.

  15. Glenn Greenwood had always bothered me because he makes me think more than I want. That is very valuable in a journalist. And for that reason, I have followed him for years.

    But like other excellent journalists, and when he doesn’t your the lefty line, he gets smeared:
    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/corporate-medias-double-standard

    Sharyl Attkison was smeared as a paranoid nut job. Andy Ngo has been smeared.

    Everytime a journalist starts to tell the truth, they are smeared. And while you, me, and most of your readrs are aware of this, the problem comes when we point to their stories as something our lefty acquaintances should read, or lefty acquaintances have already mentally filed that writer under “can’t trust that nutjob’s writing; they’re a nut job.” They’ve done that to Greenwood, Atkisson, Andy Ngo, et al.

  16. “Everytime a journalist starts to tell the truth, they are smeared. And while you, me, and most of your readrs are aware of this, the problem comes when we point to their stories as something our lefty acquaintances should read, or lefty acquaintances have already mentally filed that writer under “can’t trust that nutjob’s writing; they’re a nut job.” They’ve done that to Greenwood, Atkisson, Andy Ngo, et al.

    Yep. The Woke Ascendancy gets to make all the Cancellations, De-Credentializations (just made that up), Sovereign Exceptions, etc. in the West because, well, They Rule.

    Forget about playing Turn-About or Speaking Truth to Power (heh). Them’s not for the likes of us.

    There is no debating and probably even no populist demagogue-ing a way out of this situation. Which leaves…

  17. “…the Homeland…”

    Holy Globalism!!

    The irony of ironies of course being that the USA MUST be protected from the Democratic Party.

    (Which is, in turn, why the Democratic Party must obliterate all those who oppose its goal of achieving total power…even while they do their best to legislate fraudulent elections forever—this after their stellar “performance” last November….)

    Hmmm. Getting a bit circular here. (Orwellian circularity–which is perfectly par for the course as far as totalitarian constructs go.)

    Now that’s a nice kettle ‘a fish…. A pickle?

    FUBAR, actually… (though, one hopes without the BAR…)

  18. I have visions of clean-cut, crew-cut, gentlemen in Ford Explorers wearing brand new Hawaiian Shirts and temporary tattoos stopping at back country gas stations in the PNW and asking ‘Which way to the Homeland, Fellow White Person?’ — Cue the ‘Walks into a BAR’ jokes.

    Wonder how many BARs could be out there in the wild irretrievably lost in boating accidents, burgled by Bears, ripped off by kleptomaniac Rocs?

  19. They have been, there done that in northern Idaho, under Janet Reno. Although it was a sawed off shotgun not a Browning Automatic Rifle that served as the pretext. Vicki Weaver didn’t get the joke, but neither did Ashli Babbitt.

    “White supremacy” is very powerful after all and no joking matter. It must be treated by those with a “Can Do!” mindset. (sarc)

  20. They have been, there done that in northern Idaho, under Janet Reno.

    IIRC, the Weaver debacle occurred under the previous administration, when Wm. Barr was attorney general and Wm. Sessions the FBI director. The role of Louis Freeh and Janet Reno was to see to it that the perpetrators received no punishment.

    It was absolutely madcap to a degree Waco was not. One guy, his wife and children, and a family friend, and they have a small army there to arrest him for failure-to-appear for a hearing on a weapons charge. The weapons offense had been generated by an agent provacateur to boot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>