I have a feeling that Pennsylvania will feature highly in the coming election
They’ve certainly set it up that way:
Today the PA Supreme Court ruled that county clerks could not reject absentee and mail-in ballots where the voter signatures didn’t match. Politico reports:
“The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court ruled Friday that ballots in the state cannot be rejected because of signature comparisons, backing up guidance issued by the state’s chief elections officer heading into Pennsylvania’s first presidential election with no-excuse mail voting.
“’We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,’ the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, including five Democrats and one Republican.”
The decision seems to be based on the fact that the state Election Code doesn’t have a requirement about this, so one can’t suddenly be added.
And SCOTUS has already ruled that Pennsylvania can allow ballots to to arrive up to three days after Election Day and with no postmark. That already seemed like a perfect setup for fraud. And now this. And in one of the most important swing states of all.
That is no accident, I believe.
Dan Bongino interviewed the head of the Trafalgar Group a polling firm that has been report ably more accurate than most of the big name firms. The polling guy noted that Pennsylvania has been long been notorious for voting fraud (Philly especially IIRC but not specified) in the interview.
Bongino also interviewed Rudy Gulliani (sic probablly) and one of the majors in the Trump campaign. It was a good show.
https://bongino.com/ep-1377-interview-with-rudy-giuliani-2020-election-special
Philadelphia will cast more votes for Biden than it has adult citizens. This will not be reported in the MSM.
Ah, the historical irony.
Pennsylvania will be the definitive factor in the election.
“A Republic! If you can keep it…”
2016 county vote map: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Pennsylvania_county_level_results_for_the_United_Strates_Presidential_Election%2C_2016.svg/1280px-Pennsylvania_county_level_results_for_the_United_Strates_Presidential_Election%2C_2016.svg.png
Lawfare: 5 of the 7 PA Supreme Court Justices are Democrats.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court overruled the Legislature and required Congressional redistricting to their own model. That’s right, the majority Democrats on the PA Supreme Court selected the district boundaries that most favored their party, from a number of districting plans submitted to the Court. Just because they could, and nobody could stop them.
This year’s decisions are just crazy, with no basis in the Commonwealth’s election law or Federal guidance. Again, who is going to stop them?
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has been a joke for decades, filled with corrupt crony politics and serious ethical lapses.
In 2012 there were several precincts in Philadelphia where the total number of votes for Obama were 107% of the registered vote total. Not sure why they bothered cheating so blatantly, a fair vote would have been 93% Obama 7% Romney as the most, but zero for Romney and more votes than voters? And nobody batted an eye, business as usual.
I have seen reports that the Democrats have scores of lawyers assigned to Pennsylvania to challenge the outcome this year.
Yes, no accident.
According to the opinion, the election code and guidance was changed to allow no signature verification/analysis/comparison for absentee/mail in ballots.
That, according to the opinion, is different than the election code governing in person voting. Yes, you vote in person in PA and your signature appears different, your ballot can be contested. This signature requirement is also for provisional ballots.
Moreover, the opinion notes that this must have been intentional.
“ From Judge Ranjan’s perspective, these provisions of the Code demonstrated that the Pennsylvania General Assembly knew how to require signature verification when they so desired, and the fact they did not do so in Section 3146.8(g)(3) indicated that signature verification was not a requirement for absentee or mail-in ballots.”
Thank You John Roberts!
Some hopeful news from Legal Insurrection…which may well explain—if inadvertantly—why antifa/BLM violence on election day will be massive….
https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/10/democrats-betting-big-on-early-voting-but-may-be-overplaying-their-hand/
(But let’s hope that it’s just my perfervid imagination working triple overtime.)
I live in Pennsylvania. This is the court that said that the Republican state legislature engaged in partisan gerrymandering in drawing district lines. The court then redrew the lines with no constitutional or statutory justification and of course gerrymandered them for Democrats. We voters were helpless.
Now we have news stories saying the the Democrats hope to take the state legislature! Well, they got plenty of help.
And of course, for the many years that the state had Democrat majorities in its legislature, gerrymandering for the Democrat cause was taken for granted.
So Republicans campaigned for votes and won but lost in the tyrannical Democrat court.
Dear readers, never vote for a Democrat.
Om, they could not get a ymar type for you, so a bongino is enough.
He does good work. Wish i could say the same for the republican ankle biters here and online.
Since ballots can still be received 3 days after the election date, can we have a moratorium on counting any votes in PA until all the ballots have been received?