Buttigieg exploits a child’s emerging sexuality for political purposes
Pete Buttigieg decided it was a good idea to have a nine-year-old child join him on stage at a campaign event in Denver on Saturday to talk about his sexuality.
If you didn’t think the end was near, think again. Most of us are wishing for an asteroid extinction event at this point. The child sent a question to Buttigieg asking him to help him “be brave like you.” Cue endless virtue signaling from clapping weirdos who think it’s totally normal that a 9-year-old is thinking about gay sex.
Actually, some 9-year-olds do think about sex. What they think about it is sometimes “Ick!” But whether it’s “ick” or whether they are eagerly anticipating it or even fantasizing about it – the latter of which is probably more common these days, now that children are exposed to far more sexuality earlier and almost everywhere, including in school – please let them be, rather than encouraging some sort of public declaration.
And I don’t care whether the child is being urged to declare his gay sexuality or his hetero sexuality. Either way, it’s a tremendously inappropriate exploitation of a child. But that seems to be standard operating procedure these days.
[NOTE: Video at the link.]
What I find surprising is the contradiction between the sexualization of kids and the sexually prude behaviour among the contemporary adults. Perhaps I am missing the point here and a better comparison is between heterosexuality vs everything else, in which the latter behaviour has complete freedom.
You realize his butt-buddy Chasten is a middle school teacher? Any guesses about who put him up to this?
NB, I’d wager this youngster’s parents (or at least one of said parents) be of the ilk that have their young children subject to the ministrations of endocrinologists and surgeons.
What I find surprising is the contradiction between the sexualization of kids and the sexually prude behaviour among the contemporary adults. Perhaps I am missing the point here and a better comparison is between heterosexuality vs everything else, in which the latter behaviour has complete freedom.
The point of ‘woke’ sexual codes is to allow sexual and para-sexual conduct to be used as a weapon against ordinary men, especially bourgeois white men.
See the rage directed at Heather Mac Donald at Colgate University. One of her projects has been debunking the asinine nonsense peddled by feminist groups about the prevalence of criminal sexual assaults on campus. It’s a persistent libel directed at a particular class of people, imputing to them a tendency from which they do not possess in any systematic way – a propensity to commit violent crimes.
Conjoined to that are the activities of student affairs apparatchiks. The notions at the heart of their investigations and judgment incorporate the following: the notion that ‘sexual assault’ is defined not by a series of objective acts which presume agency by the parties involved, but by the feelz of the woman in these transactions, specifically the retrospective feelz.
You can see in the Blasey Ford lallapalooza that the discourse surrounding such cases is to allow accusations to be used against ordinary men in blatant power moves. Liberals swallowed her account hook line and sinker. I’ve yet to encounter one who would state the obvious: that occam’s razor says it was a fabrication.
At the same time, you have phenomena like the Katelyn Hunt case a few years back. The Hunts were so trashy that their daughter was a tough sell. Still, advertising and marketing firms are not lacking in homosexual employees, and soon enough they’ll find their case. My wager would be that the pathway attempted will be that which was used to gut laws against the traffick in obscenity: establish among prosecutors a social climate wherein it is status-lowering to prosecute male homosexuals and lesbians for statutory rape and the like. The counter-pressure from feminist groups (and the divorce bar) would permit ferocious prosecution of ordinary men for banging jailbait even as pederasty was effectively made legal.
Booty-gag knows his campaign isn’t going anywhere, so he may be willing to lend himself to these envelope-pushing exercises. One student of his conduct maintains he’s not running for President of the United States, but for President of an east-coast NGO, and that he’ll dump Chasten after he lands it.
Yes, the sexualizing of children just doesn’t compute to me. My childhood was probably typical of the 1930s-40s. Girls were aliens to me and of little interest until one day when I was a sophomore (about 15 years old). It was in a student council meeting and the senior representative was a beautiful girl. She said some nice things to me and all of a sudden I noticed a stirring in my loins. I was embarrassed and confused by the sensations I was feeling. I confided in my best friend about my sudden attraction to this beautiful girl. He was a year older than me and he assured me that it was normal. He told me that he had begun having the same attraction to girls a year or more before. He had had “the talk” with his dad and learned some interesting things. I didn’t have a dad at that time in my life, so I learned at least the rudiments of the birds and bees from him.
I don’t remember when I learned there was such a thing as gays and lesbians. maybe in my first year in college. I remember being amazed that such a thing could happen. I had found being attracted to women so enjoyable and energizing that it was hard for me to imagine that all men didn’t feel the same. As far as lesbians were concerned, that seemed even more unimaginable.
My first encounter with a gay man was a friend of my mother’s. He was the CEO of a major company with a summer home in my home town. He always spent two weeks each year at his place but accompanied by a different man each year. He was a charming, wealthy man and fun to be around. Not at all what I had expected a gay man to be like. But he also reveled in having numerous partners. He once remarked that variety was the spice of life. I didn’t get it how anyone could be gay, but because he was a family friend, I accepted him for who he was.
I feel sorry for children who are introduced to sex at an early age. Why not let them be children with no, or few, sexual thoughts until their hormones kick in and then guide them from there. It’s a shame that’s not possible in today’s society. I feel nothing but compassion for those who end up gay or sexually confused. Normal sexuality between men and women is such a wonderful, energizing, creative thing that it’s just a shame it doesn’t happen for 100% of humans.
This was a horribly inappropriate thing for Buttigieg to do with a nine-year-old child. Presumably the child’s parents were okay with his going up on stage in front of all those people to talk about this. Shame on them, too.
“Why not let them be children with no, or few, sexual thoughts until their hormones kick in and then guide them from there.”
I think this right here is a significant chunk of the problem. I have a friend who is the mother of a 10-year-old girl; the girl recently said to her mother, in a very serious, matter-of-fact, I-totally-thought-this-through way, that she must be a lesbian because she doesn’t think she has any feelings for boys.
That’s totally insane.
I have heard anecdotally about kids physically hitting puberty earlier than even my day (and we teens of the 1980s got around early and often). I can’t comment on that. But this particular 10-year-old is physically a child. I am hopeful that her mother told her something wise about waiting until she finds out what those feelings are, and she will, by 12, or 13 or so.
Little kids are being bizarrely marinated in sex when they have no idea what sex even is. It’s disgusting how social media and these days, even school itself, is shoving premature ideas about sex down the throat of little kids who are not sexually aware yet. No wonder they’re stressed and confused.
This is beyond the pale.
Terrible judgment by his campaign advisors.
Let’s be real here though, the advisors (likely) only think such things are a good idea when they have data that it will poll well among a desired voting bloc.
Too many people have terrible and destructive opinions that are already leading to the destruction of our society. They call this “progress”.
I look forward to the Blacks in SC giving Buttplug a good pounding in the primary. They do *not* like deviants.
As Tucker Carlson says on his @WokeCapital twitter account: globohomo is interested in your kids.
A must-follow, btw. You will not believe how pervasive this stuff is… these people are nuts.
This child should be taken from his parents. They’re not fit to raise chickens if this is how they treat their son…as a prop for political point scoring & SJW virtue signalling..
And Oh Yeah…watch Mayor Pete’s numbers crash in SC and throughout Super Tuesday. Dead Man Walking.
By the end of March it’ll be the Old Commie & the Billionaire…maybe Sleepy Joe stumbling around some…but the others…buh bye.
I look forward to the Blacks in SC giving Buttplug a good pounding in the primary. They do *not* like deviants.
My rough impression over the years is that like v. dislike does not enter into it. Homosexuality is comparatively unusual among blacks and homosexuals-in-general are figures of fun. (See, for example, Quentin Crisp’s account of how locals reacted to him when he moved to the Lower East Side of Manhattan in 1969; see, for another, the Wayons brothers’ Men on Films). Figures of fun are jesters, not leaders. Just my $0.02.
Even if he didn’t have this problem, Booty-gag is a thoroughly ‘wine-track’ character, and that’s a disadvantage among black voters, though not an insuperable one. (Compare, for example, Gary Hart’s observed performance among blacks with Walter Mondale’s).
Buttigieg is late to the party:
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/were-not-monsters-10-year-old-transgender-girl-on-importance-of-gender-rights-legislation
Not for the easily infuriated.
Transgender (e.g. trans/homosexuality) is trendy.
Not sure if this is good news or not, but at least it’s different for these days.
https://www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sports/heaven-fitch-north-carolina-high-school-wrestling-title
She appears to be a genuine cis-female, not trans, so maybe this really is a case of “turn about is fair play.”
(I personally don’t think girl-bodies should wrestle with boy-bodies, regardless of Gender Identification, but I seem to be fading into the minority these days.)
When a progressive is upset by a statement, more often than not, the statement is true. Want to really get the Libs upset, specifically the gay rights mob? Point out the vast majority of arrest and founded reports of pedophilia, I mean gob-smacking majority of cases involve men with little boys. Think of the issues in the Catholic Church for example. Or cases involving boy scouts. Men who like boys or other men have one thing in common? As evidence by, although politically incorrect and not playing well to the media, Leftist, progressive or gay rights narrative, is fairly conclusive. – – – All homosexuals are latent pedophiles.
Although the American Psychiatrics Association (APA) removed homosexuality from it’s list of phycological disorders . . ostensibly based more on political rather than medical considerations. Homosexuality is a mental disorder that, untreated and unbidden, leads to many other such disorders, leaving society damaged, and in this case, out children, at risk.