Home » Judge Amy Brennan Jackson plans to go full steam ahead with sentencing Stone

Comments

Judge Amy Brennan Jackson plans to go full steam ahead with sentencing Stone — 33 Comments

  1. The linguistic element (“seized”) is both interesting and important; in the MSM Republicans are always “pouncing” on one thing or another. Yet this is by no means only humorous; for decades, in truly Orwellian fashion, leftists have been intent upon controlling language, as when they define their opponents as “fascists” and any utterance they dislike as “hate speech.” This has led, for example, to the frequent use in the media of the term “conspiracy theory” to mean any idea, how matter how well-supported by facts and evidence, with which leftists disagree.

  2. One more ‘straw’ upon the ‘camel’s’ back… brings us a bit closer to the day when our current circumstances are no longer sufferable.

    “when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.”

  3. If this case were to land in appeals court, would the judge’s seating of jurors with tangible bias be examined?

  4. The judges that are not corrupt and incompetent scumbags should be terrified by what’s happening.

    Humans work in broad brush strokes when it comes to friend or foe.

    That portion of our society that is, by nature, law abiding and supportive of the rule of law is learning to see judges, in the broad brush, as enemy.

    And all those judges that aren’t corrupt scumbags or incompetent douchebags just sit on their hands and say “not my problem. I do my court, they do theirs”.

    And in the end, that’s taken as compliant to the corruption and incompetence.

    If (more likely really when) the rage breaks, no one’s gonna care, Mr or Mz Judge, if you were a good one or not. You’ll be a judge and judges will be known as enemy.

    It’s your profession. Fix it.

  5. When the public cannot trust the judicial system, it begins to consider alternatives.

    The Democrats are playing with fire.

  6. There will only be HUGE change if Reps win the a big House victory in 2020.

    And then start impeaching the FISA judges – which they can do, without the DoJ.

    The Reps should probably de-fund the DoJ of all but politically appointed persons, and a single assistant. So many bad ones that it’s better to get rid of them all, then possibly allow a few good ones to come back. This was my idea even before reading Barry M’s zerohedge RICO ideas (which I agree with):
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/coupgate-localized-civil-war-now-underway-doj

    We don’t need a Federal Dept. of Justice that allows Sec. of States to have illegal servers, or run some Bribery Foundation, or try to entrap Republicans they don’t like.

    Same with FBI & CIA & NSA — plus the foreign “experts” keep getting stuff way wrong.

    But back awake, the deep state is more likely to slither away, ready to slither away another day, but come back with the next Dem Pres.

    Injustice makes so many, and me, so angry. It even makes Dems angry, but they feel the injustice is that Trump did wrong things, almost never honestly articulated, which he’s not being punished for.

    That’s where Dem control of language and elite thinking, coming from Dem dominated Law Schools and elite colleges, has helped destroy thinking and reasoning in America.

  7. Given who the forewoman was and the fact that she lied on the juror questionnaire is clearly reversible error. Not even a close question. Hard to believe. The forewoman was prejudiced against Stone.

  8. The worst of it is that Stone will sit in prison until his appeal is heard.

    Judge is an an Obama appointee. Terrible judge.

  9. Milken’s crime was that, not only was he a financial innovator, he was a Jew. Wall Street was quite different 40 years ago than it is today.

  10. “She received her A.B. cum laude from Harvard College in 1976 and her Juris Doctor cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1979.”

    No surprise. Liberal, Ivy League elitist.

    If Stone was a Dem, the new trial motion would be granted.

  11. No surprise that thousands of former DOJ employees want Atty. Gen. Barr to resign.

    Especially before the investigations find the huge amount of political corruption from which they personally profited. They are running scared.

  12. The word “seized”, in this context, conjures the image of a drowning man seizing a life preserver.

    It would be more accurately used to describe how the Dems grabbed on to the Russian Collusion theory earlier.

  13. What the country needs is a purge accompanied by convictions. What the country will get is lies, obstruction, propaganda, and lukewarm apologies and refusal to prosecute.

    A Republic dies under a deep blue, sunny sky. No need for darkness.

  14. Edward on February 18, 2020 at 7:42 pm said:
    When the public cannot trust the judicial system, it begins to consider alternatives.

    The Democrats are playing with fire.
    * * *
    Some of the public has never trusted the judicial system, and I don’t mean just the Black Lives Matter crew. There have always been errors and bias and corruption — not always the same thing. Check out the story of Leo Frank, for one.
    However, when a substantial portion of the large majority of people who don’t normally interact with the judicial system (as opposed to the chronically ‘justice-involved persons’*) believe they can no longer trust the justice system, THEN you are well on the way to burning it all down.

    *https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-francisco-board-adopts-new-language-for-criminals-turning-convicted-felon-into-justice-involved-person

  15. Turley should have noted that the” white supremacists” in the phrase “Trump and the white supremacist racists” literally refers to white supremacists. She is talking about those who marched in Charlottesville “the night before” (in Trump’s words) carrying tiki torches and chanting “Jews will not replace us”.

    In this context, Hart’s words are hardly evidence of extreme bias. It is not like she is calling Trump’s cabinet “white supremacists”.

    Recall that the most generous interpretation of Trumps words is that he believes those who chose to march in a hardcore modern-day klan rally (the “night before”) with white supremacists chanting “Jews will not replace us” are very fine people.

  16. those who marched in Charlottesville “the night before” (in Trump’s words) carrying tiki torches and chanting “Jews will not replace us”.

    Manju repeats the lie about the young men marching who chanted “YOU will not replace us” as they protested anti-male bias. Listen to the video, not the left wing liars.

  17. Turley should have noted that the” white supremacists” in the phrase “Trump and the white supremacist racists” literally refers to white supremacists. She is talking about those who marched in Charlottesville “the night before” (in Trump’s words) carrying tiki torches and chanting “Jews will not replace us”.

    Manju’s promoting the idea that Jared Kushner’s father-in-law is a promoter of anti-semitism. The troll farm Manju works for – whose business is propagating talking points on behalf of the party of Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar – is not sending us their best.

  18. Judge Nap of Fox agrees with me. Said nearly every judge in the country would grant a new trial. And he was a real judge!

    Amy knows what is right and she is after Stone.

  19. “Manju repeats the lie about the young men marching who chanted “YOU will not replace us” as they protested anti-male bias. Listen to the video, not the left wing liars.”

    Manju is a left wing liar

  20. Cornhead said: “Amy knows what is right and she is after Stone.”

    I think she is actually after Trump. I think all the Democratic activists who continue to poke and prod at people around Trump (Stone, Barr, Pompeo, et. al.) keep hoping they can cause Trump to overreact at some point, so they will have a solid event to point at to illustrate their contention that Trump is unfit for office.

    I have to admit my amazement that Trump has not yet done so. He has worked under a lot of pressure, and he’s managed to hold himself in check, with the possible exception of his Twitter account.

  21. This may look dumb tomorrow, but the smart thing for ABJ would be to sentence Stone to probation. It will be difficult for her to refuse a new trial, given the juror bias, but does Stone really want to do this again? He would probably accept probation, and then the judge puts this mess behind her. Her determination to proceed to sentencing leads me to believe that this is her intention. (But her thinking is so weird that prediction is chancy.)

  22. Judges can also be impeached if they are criminal, incompetent or fail to follow the law be design.

  23. I would think Stone has grounds for an appeal, and if it went to an actual unbiased judge, Stone should win the appeal. It really is scary how biased leftist judges are and they don’t even try to hide it. Isn’t there also a way for Stone’s lawyers to seek to censure the judge for bias?

  24. “It really is scary how biased leftist judges are and they don’t even try to hide it.” – Delilah

    Actually, this is a good development – much preferable to having biased judges who DID pretend to be impartial, but followed their bias nonetheless.
    At least now we have an overt “paper trail” for appeal.

  25. Manju repeats the lie about the young men marching who chanted “YOU will not replace us” as they protested anti-male bias. Listen to the video, not the left wing liars.

    I hear them saying both…you and Jews.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>