Home » Judge in Flynn case accuses Flynn’s lawyer

Comments

Judge in Flynn case accuses Flynn’s lawyer — 8 Comments

  1. J. Sullivan had also earlier in this fiasco popped off about Flynn committing “treason” and quickly withdrew the comment. He’s not right in the head, this Judge.

  2. Couldn t accuse the client so he went after the lawyer. SDferr probably has him right . Is he in age bracket for dementia to be showing up ? Must be if appt by Bush.

  3. Judge Sullivan’s actions demonstrate his incompetence. He condemns himself with this ruling. Not that he will suffer any consequence whatsoever for his stomping upon justice.

  4. I am reminded of that defamation suit filed by climate scientist Michael Mann against conservative commentator Mark Steyn, which has been going on since at least 2012. Some of the judges involved along the way in that lawsuit have retired, with other judges (according to Steyn) showing themselves to be incompetent and uninformed.

    As Mark Steyn has said, the process is the punishment.

  5. The reason the federal judiciary does not care for Sullivan is because she is not a pushover for the feds. She is tough as nails, fights hard for her clients and does not give the feds the ‘respect’ the judges (without evidence) believe the feds deserve.

  6. Judges like this is one of the reasons I quit practicing law. I would have laughed in her face over it and dared her to report me to the Disciplinary Board.

  7. It is hard to tell from a distance, but it looks like an internet link in the text is not a sufficient reference to an “Authority”. Proper form and all that, lest the peasants think the court is like 4chan.

    As in, What good is it being a “judge” if you can’t crap on lawyers?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>