The mullahs feel the economic heat
The leaders of Iran are feeling the economic pressure exerted by the Trump administration:
The critics of President Trump’s Iran policy have been proven wrong: the US sanctions are imposing significant pressure on the ruling mullahs of Iran and the ability to fund their terror groups.
Before the US Department of Treasury leveled secondary sanctions against Iran’s oil and gas sectors, Tehran was exporting over two million barrel a day of oil. Currently, Tehran’s oil export has gone down to less than 200,000 barrel a day, which represents a decline of roughly 90% in Iran’s oil exports.
…Speaking in the city of Kerman on November 12, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani acknowledged for the first time that “Iran is experiencing one of its hardest years since the 1979 Islamic revolution” and that “the country’s situation is not normal.”
Rouhani also complained: “Although we have some other incomes, the only revenue that can keep the country going is the oil money. We have never had so many problems in selling oil.”…
Thanks to the US policy of “maximum pressure,” the Islamic Republic’s overall economy has taken a major beating as well. Lately, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has again adjusted its forecast for Iran’s economy and pointed out that Iran’s economy is expected to shrink by 9.5% rather than 6% by the end of 2019.
One of the reasons behind IMF’s gloomy picture of Iran’s economy is linked to the Trump administration’s decision not to extend its waiver for Iran’s eight biggest oil buyers; China, India, Greece, Italy, Taiwan, Japan, Turkey and South Korea.
This is, of course, in contrast to the policies of the Obama administration.
You may have heard about increasing demonstrations in Iran recently, and a crackdown by authorities that has left over 100 people dead. There is a connection:
The deadly drama playing out in Iran since last Friday, leaving more than 100 protesters dead, shows three things. Tehran is increasingly in desperate economic straits, in part because of intense U.S. sanctions; Iranian popular discontent with the regime’s economic mismanagement seems to have reached a breaking point; and the regime is more frightened of popular unrest than at any time in recent years.
The latest explosion of popular protest in Iran began on Friday after the government rescinded fuel subsidies, which essentially tripled the price of gasoline—a painful blow to millions of ordinary Iranians already struggling to survive a debased currency, high unemployment, and a shrinking economy. But the demonstrations that began over fuel subsidies quickly became a sweeping, nationwide protest against the Iranian regime itself, with outbreaks in dozens of cities in every Iranian province, targeting especially government buildings such as police stations and state-owned banks.
The government’s response has been much more brutal than in previous outbreaks of protest, such as in 2017-2018, including a near-total shutdown of the internet and unrestrained use of violence by security forces. Groups including Amnesty International have documented at least 106 deaths during the protests, as regime security forces have used live ammunition to target demonstrators. The brutal crackdown is both evidence of the regime’s desperation at its own inability to sway popular opinion and a result of watching weeks of similar deadly protests (also directed against Iran) in Iraq and Lebanon…
… Since U.S. President Donald Trump reimposed sweeping sanctions on Iran’s economy, including the ban on oil sales, Iran’s economy has been in a free fall.
Is there any chance the government of Iran could fall? A regime willing to kill demonstrators is demonstrating both power and weakness. Ruthless measures can reach a point of diminishing returns if the number of protestors becomes huge, and a particular turning point tends to be if and when the security forces of police and military decide to turn on the regime and side with the demonstrators. Then all bets are off.
It doesn’t seem that Iran is anywhere near that point. But when it happens, it can happen suddenly and unexpectedly.
Though we cannot see into Iran these last few days it does seem the nation has entered a civil war that will not end until one side or the other is victorious. I’m not a bettor but I would not bet on the regime. They have too many hostile neighbors, to say nothing of the hostility of the US, Israel and others further abroad.
Four rockets were fired from Syrian territory into Northern Israel night before last, all intercepted, prevented from striking. Shortly thereafter Israeli Defense Forces struck a couple of dozen Iranian and Syrian regime targets in Syria, smashing stuff up, killing perhaps 20 some odd people, mostly Quds Force types we’re told. Why was Iran inducing its proxies to do stupid shit? Because Israeli had been recently killing Iranian proxies doing stupid shit, probably.
and so will A Schiff(ty) person soon.
As reported on Wednesday the head of Burisma Holdings was indicted this week in Ukraine! He has gone missing
Democrat Adam Schiff is linked to both US corporations named in the $7.4 BILLION corruption case.
Schiff is connected to both BlackRock and Franklin Templeton Investments, two companies that were named in the $7.4B Burisma/US-Ukraine corruption claim that was announced
Heshmat Alavi reports as of 1 hour ago:
Let us hope that not only the terrorist regime in Iran goes down, but also the communist regime in China.
But, but, but, have you heard what Trump said about Carly Fiorina during the campaign?
Harming the interests of the Iranian regime and perhaps hastening its end just isn’t worth it if we have to put up with mean tweets and painful noticing of reality from the Bad Orange Man.
Kate… there is NO CHANCE the chinese regime will go.. none, zippo, nada
When Tianeman square happened, maybe you forget they used 30 caliber machine guns… on a population of college students, and so on… right now, they are rounding up the protestors, and they will be sent to camps..
for some other history
even Russia is still Russia..
a KGB man runs the state now, and has stayed in office how long?
poisoned people in the UK?
killed over 400 press people (which i think the press people here dont believe.. or they dont think that such would apply to them after the change)
The Chinese could kill 100 million of their own, and not blink an eye
there is no way it can change…
they even tried the Hong Kong way to copy us baltics which negated Kruschev, who said “we have lost the baltics”… no, the chinese would not lose a tiny island.
Bolivians escaped feeling the heat
‘Don’t Let Food into the Cities’: Evo Morales Caught on Tape Planning Starvation in Bolivia
I used to read a blogger who called herself “IranGirl.” She was a big fan of the Iraq War. She was quite moved when Saddam Hussein fell. Then she wrote, “Us next, please.”
I haven’t been able to find her on the internet in probably ten years. I hope she’s safe. I fear she’s not.
Refusing to lend the Iranians who were trying to rebel so much as public moral support is one of the many evil things the Sith did.
Another was announcing when we would leave Iraq, and then doing it.
He was and remains a disgrace to the country. Our worst disgrace by far.
Obama propped up the mullahs. Obama was a terrible President.
“A regime willing to kill demonstrators is demonstrating both power and weakness. Ruthless measures can reach a point of diminishing returns if the number of protestors becomes huge, and a particular turning point tends to be if and when the security forces of police and military decide to turn on the regime and side with the demonstrators. Then all bets are off.” – Neo
Big IFs.
IF 1:
AFAIK, there were no successful mass public protests* against Hitler and Lenin and Mao like those we see in Iran and Hong Kong (and other places not in current news). Maybe circumstances back then just didn’t support the kind of organizing and publicity we have now, which can magnify protestors’ actions to the level that might produce change in the regime.
IF 2:
The German military never turned against Hitler (Russian in-fighting was a different can of worms), especially not in the beginning, before it got too nazified to have a critical mass of rebellion; and later, the scattered individuals and small groups — the actual real #Resistance whose virtue our Leftists have tried to coopt — were unsuccessful in their coup attempts.
That counter-factual history is what the Left tries to invoke with their Bushitler! and Trump is Hitler! alarms, but the reality in the US is so far different they mostly get traction only among those who are already true believers.
*The one time I know of that Hitler backed down was when he orderd the euthanasia of retarded children and other defectives, and faced a fierce back-lash from German (Aryan) mothers. IRRC, he needed the support of the women on the home-front too badly to alienate them, and (at that time) had not completely solidified his nazification of the country to the point where he could ignore or bulldoze (punish) them.
I don’t remember the exact details; they are in a book called “Mothers in the Fatherland.”
The mullahs in trouble?
My gosh, how is that possible? What have Obama’s allies been spending their precious billions on?
No wonder the Democrats insist that Trump is unfit—abandoning an ally is simply not acceptable!!
Clearly, another solid reason to vote “D” in November 2020.
Related:
https://nypost.com/2019/11/21/heres-whos-likely-to-lead-iran-if-the-ayatollah-is-deposed/amp/
OCTOBER 2, 2019 / 1:07 PM
“LONDON/DUBAI (Reuters) – More than 20 ships carrying around one million tonnes of grain are stuck outside Iranian ports as U.S. sanctions create payment problems and hamper the country’s efforts to import vital commodities, sources directly involved in the trade said.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-shipping-food-exclusive-idUSKBN1WH21A
No country other than the USA, and perhaps not the US either, can keep up a large middle class life style without global trade.
The failure of the mullahs to diversify their economy away from oil export dependency is a huge “national security” issue for them. I was saddened, tho not much surprised, that Obama made no effort to support the prior Iranian protests. Instead, he sent them hundreds of millions of dollars.
Which the economic geniuses in Iran chose to spend on spreading terror around, rather than building up their own infrastructure & non-oil production capacity.
The Iranian civil war now seems likely to be coming. The mullahs cannot murder thousands, tho killing dozens still seems possible, and thus likely. Unfortunately, tho as usual, while millions of Iranians may agree that the mullahs should go, they are unlikely to agree on what will replace them.
So a military coup / military refusing to kill protestors seems likely for Iran.
In China, the military will kill as many as needed to keep the commie billionaires in power. Two big differences: (1)the commies are willing to kill far more Chinese than the mullahs are willing to kill Shiite Iranians, and (2) there is a lot more cash for the Chinese military leaders.
When the Iranian revolution happens, Trump won’t get much credit, and will get blamed for “so much needless slaughter”. But few Americans, if any, will be coming back in body bags.
Would a “good President” be willing to spend 1000 American lives to save 100 000 Iranian lives? Perhaps by invading to help the anti-mullah Iranians? I’m sure the Dem media would demonize any Rep Pres. who lost American lives, so it makes great political sense, tho perhaps less moral sense, for any Rep Pres. to just use the economic soft power like Trump is using.
Iran’s current population is estimated at over 82 million people.
When Syria went to civil war at Assad’s choosing, Syrian population was estimated at 22.4 million. Half a million Syrians have died in that war. Current estimates seem to be in the range of 17+ million population, many of whom are internally displaced people. There are many millions of Syrians residing in camps in Jordan, Turkey, and Lebanon today.
Many of the Syrian dead have been killed by among others: Assad’s army, Russians and Iranians and Iranian agents: Hezbollah Lebanese, Iraqi and other mercenaries from various middle and further eastern nations, such as Afghanistan for instance.
The Mullahs likely will not have — as Assad did — another Iran-like state standing outside willing to jump into Iran with men and treasure to expend to support a dead end. I think they are doomed, though they may not understand this yet.
“Groups including Amnesty International have documented at least 106 deaths during the protests, as regime security forces have used live ammunition to target demonstrators.”
If Amnesty International has been able to document 106 I do wonder what the actual number of deaths is? It must be well over that. Also, how many are injured? how many are under arrest? I suspect we will never really know.
The Amnesty International report actually stated that all 106 of those protesters were, in fact, murdered by agents of the ‘Zionist Entity’.
OK ( rayciss comment? ) it didn’t really say that. But you can bet dollars to doughnuts it’s authors WANTED to say that.
Barry’s NYP article included this phrase “security forces stood down after the people offered them flowers” which intrigued me (shadows of Kent State and all that).
Internet search turned up a list of articles on the riots coming from the Middle East and other outlets outside the US news media.
Long list of anecdotal reports from different areas.
https://iranintl.com/en/iran/despite-crackdown-protests-continue-iran-audience-messages-iran-international
Video only, but it shows the protestors handing out flowers to forces who, it was said, did retire without incident.
https://www.france24.com/en/20191119-three-iranian-security-forces-personnel-killed-by-rioters
Regime-supporting media perspective, with a pretense of “balanced” coverage.
Perhaps their analog to the NYT “Middle of the Road” claims.
https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2019/11/19/2143169/rioters-caught-shooting-at-people-in-iran-s-khuzestan-province-video
A different take on the flower children’s motives, with pictures.
https://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13980829000246
We have to beggar the poor in order to save them.
Spinning like a top, but no flowers.
https://apnews.com/283637ea6eb44474ba706ea4c908990d
This is bad news for the arrestees – no hope of a fair trial, or any trial at all.
No flowers for anyone.
https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2019/11/21/2143996/irgc-ringleaders-of-recent-riots-arrested
More on the scope of riots and the persons arrested.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/19/iran-security-forces-violently-crack-down-protesters
The France24 video linked above had pictures of a statement by Mike Pompeo saying the US stood with the protesters.
Is that meddling in another country’s business?
Is it a different kind of meddling from, say, sending planeloads of cash to the regime leaders?
What kind of meddling is, and is not, acceptable to the Political Cognoscenti?
For bonus points:
When is a regime allowed to use force to put down insurrection?
(Remember, John Adams defended a British soldier charged with shooting a protesting colonist.)
Are protestors, especially including thuggish rioters, a legitimate insurrection or a lawless mob?
(Where do Antifa and The Proud Boys fall on the spectrum of thugs?)
How do you tell the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?
Are there any general principles, or just the consideration of what side you are on?
“A rebellion is always legal in the first person — our rebellion; it is only in the third person, their rebellion, that it is illegal.” Benjamin Franklin
FWIW, I say stand by the protestors in Iran, as well as in Hong Kong.
And IMO there are principles that distinguish terrorists from defensible insurrectionists, usually concernng their targets and level of brutality.
Are there any general principles, or just the consideration of what side you are on?
Are there any general principles? Yep.
This right here: “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”
“The US and its proxies have gained nothing 18 months after the imposition of fresh sanctions on the Iranian nation,” according to tasnim.news (2nd link above).
This must be what nothing looks like, then.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-shipping-food-exclusive-idUSKBN1WH21A
Barry Meislin on November 22, 2019 at 2:42 am said:
Related:
https://nypost.com/2019/11/21/heres-whos-likely-to-lead-iran-if-the-ayatollah-is-deposed/amp/
* * *
Lots of good observations among the impassioned assertions.
Of course, the calculus of “what good is something” differs for the ruling elite and the populace, in more countries than Iran.
AesopFan on November 22, 2019 at 4:40 pm said:
Agreed to both.
Roya Boroumand, twitter: A doctor in Tehran: “the emergency room’s doctor in Robat Karim says they are bringing in 100 people injured by gun shots every day. At least 30 or 40 have died. The number 138 killed is way below reality.”
(via @Doranimated)
Iran internet service has within the last couple of hours (6:30 am eastern) risen from less than 25% connectivity to 69%. Information of the last five days’ events has begun flowing out.
I stand in awe of the many people throughout history who have been willing to die in their opposition to tyranny and injustice. They have courage, and honour, that most of us might shrink from emulating, and that their rulers cannot begin to approach.
However, our own #Resistance, despite their claim (and possiblly sincere belief by the naive) that Republicans are Nazis and Trump is Hitler, are not in that valorous company, as they (especially Antifa) know full well that their lives are not in danger from government or police, and very little peril from their victims on the street.
Even the thugs on the “Right” don’t do as much damage in their occasional melees as the Left does.
“Right” in sarc-quotes because of this article:
https://quillette.com/2017/05/03/time-retire-political-spectrum/