Glenn Loury and the comments in the NY Times: on Sharpton and the Democrats
Economics professor and pundit Glenn Loury, who is black, writes this opinion piece in the NY Times as a caution to his fellow Democrats:
When I first heard that President Trump had gone after the Rev. Al Sharpton — and that Mr. Sharpton had responded in kind — I must admit that I laughed. Are there two New York City hustlers who deserve one another more?
But 48 hours later, I feel differently. That’s thanks to the leading Democratic candidates for president, who have rushed to Mr. Sharpton’s defense, extolling his supposed virtues as a civil-rights paragon while denouncing Mr. Trump’s attack as racist. In doing so, they have, yet again, taken Mr. Trump’s bait, handing him another easy victory while yoking themselves to a genuine bigot.
Other than the usual Trump-bashing, it’s an excellent article, one the Democrats should well heed. But I doubt they will.
I found the comments to the article especially interesting and varied. There were a few of the usual conservatives and Republicans come in to berate the crowd, and I’ll skip over them. It was the Democrats and their reactions to the piece of sensible advice that I was curious about.
Here’s one that was typical of a sizeable faction:
I’d like to think there’s a way to point out the problematic aspects of Al Sharpton’s legacy without using tropes that have often served as racist dog whistles. Namely, laments about “Black-on-Black violence” and the decline of the Black family. Are there problems within the Black community? Sure, as there are in most communities, but racism from external sources is the main cause of our community’s ills, plain and simple. The correctness of some of the analysis of Al Sharpton isn’t sufficient to justify statements to the contrary.
Racism is the cause of it all, and “laments” about “Black-on Black violence” are a racist dog whistle. Party line stuff.
But there was also this sort of thing:
Thank you for writing this op-ed. I’m a self-described liberal Democrat and former New Yorker and I remember clearly the incidents you’ve recounted [regarding Sharpton]. He may say things that I agree with and support at the round tables on MSNBC but until I hear some full-throated admissions and apologies for past wrongs I will switch channels or mute the volume until he’s done.
If we want to castigate Trump for continuing to believe the Central Park 5 are guilty then let the same be done to Sharpton for refusing to publicly acknowledge that Tawana Brawley was lying.
That would be a good start.
But this is very typical as well:
I don’t care about Al Sharpton. I’ve known what he’s about for decades.
What I care about is an American president who is doing his best to sow racial discord for his own advantage.
And then there’s this, which was a discouraging reminder of the need to rationalize:
It’s certainly hard to forget or disavow Sharpton’s past, and, as a Jew, I’m certainly offended by many of his words and actions. And, of course, the Brawley affair was nothing short of despicable. And yet, on MSNBC, he comes across as thoughtful, measured, and reasonable. So, i guess he is a huckster, as is our President. But, for the moment, I’m willing to accept the image he’s choosing to project, and to reject the image Trump is choosing to project (BTW, it’s the same one DJT and his hateful father Fred always projected). Regarding the Rev, proceed with caution. Regarding his nemesis, proceed with fear and disdain.
A lot of liberals commenting on the Loury article hate Sharpton. They hate Trump, too, but they definitely hate Sharpton and are very disappointed that the candidates defended him.
But they’re not disappointed enough in the candidates to ever consider taking an objective look at Republicans and what they actually say and do rather than what the Times and the MSM in general say that they say and do. Although the Democrats’ stance re Sharpton puzzles them and many of them disapprove of it, it will probably remain just a tiny little blip on their radar screens.
This is a more extreme version of general disaffection:
Situations like this explain why I hate politics. I hate Trump and I hate Sharpton. Even the politicians I like personally do not hesitate to pay lip service to the people I loathe. I got nobody on my side.
If Donald Trump has done anything positive, it has been to prove that someone can throw caution to the wind, say “unsayable” things and win a national election. I’m just waiting for someone to take that path who isn’t a lying megalomaniac.
Sadly no one in the 2020 field fits that description.
And here’s someone who exemplifies what I mean when I say that a great many of them believe every word the MSM says about Trump, and don’t like Sharpton and are angry at his Democratic defenders, but would never, never ever, desert the Democrats no matter what they do:
Trump rarely speaks a true word but he is right about
Sharpton. Sharpton is a conman and a race-baiter and a cop-hater. I’m a 74-year-old Democrat who would rather be caged at the border than vote for a Republican, much less for Trump. But I hate being on the same team as
Sharpton — and Omar, too.
This next comment is just plain weird. Loury is black, as I said. And I am pretty sure this person is white but perhaps isn’t aware of Loury’s race:
The “collapse of the black family” is a coded message from the 1950s and 1960s segregationists. It’s really old news, and the fact that this economist brings it up just shows his own latent bias.
I wonder if the current generation of African-Americans would attest to a “collapse of the black family.” I suspect not. Only a white person would say that.
And an enormous number of commenters say that Sharpton and Trump are alike and that they “deserve each other,” something that Loury mentions in his first paragraph.
Here’s a different take; one of the few who has considered switching affiliations:
I have had the honor of having had several letters published on these pages; and while responding in different ways to different columnists, I have repeated consistently that I, a registered Democrat, was deeply influenced during Watergate by a Lutheran pro-Nixon colleague who argued that God supports imperfect leaders for good ends. The good ends now are the defense of Israel and the fight against antisemitism. To say the least, the Squad is not philosemitic, and President Trump is the best friend of Israel since President Truman. Like other American Jews, I pray for a just peace in the Middle East; and I believe that that can happen with a federated province of Palestine existing under the aegis of Israeli sovereignty, on the analogy of Quebec in Canada. Yes, President Trump plays the race card; but I believe the Squad, Al Sharpton, and many of the Democratic candidates play it as well in reverse. I consider the antisemitism of the Left to be a major problem which needs to be exposed and combatted forcefully. That that has not been done may well influence my turning Republican next year.
In the comments to the article, it’s taken as an absolute given that Trump is a racist, a conman, and a liar. No one gives an example, or thinks there’s a need to do so. They just say it, and no one refutes it because the group considers it a self-evident truth.
What I care about is an American president who is doing his best to sow racial discord for his own advantage.
Says the Obama voter.
The routine acceptance of the “racist” accusation against Trump is infuriating. The final comment you cite, by the possible switcher, shows he’s almost there — but he needs to read Trump’s actual comment and tweets, not what the leftist media say Trump said. I don’t know how to get through to such people.
“… American president who is doing his best to sow racial discord …”
Trump is reaping the discord, the true racists are sowing it.
That’s why they hate Trump.
It is very obvious from the comments posted by Neo that there is a great deal of hate among Democrats.
Hate that trumps reason (!). The hate shown is unreasoning and vicious. They are saying Yes, Sharpton is a lying SOB, but he is our SOB, so we will stand with him against a man we hate. Never mind that Trump is doing his level best to restore America back from the bulldozing leveling of the Dems and RINOs, the free traders and the Chicomm lovers, the Open Borders wimps, the people that despise Walmart but use economics to force the Deplorables to shop there because they cannot afford a pricier alternative like Target.
OT: This article was linked by Powerline. It is about Tulsi Gabbard.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html
Weird.
It is the people who voted for Trump, however reluctantly, that the left hates. Yes, they hate Trump, but they hate the ‘deplorables’ even more. They actually wish us dead, or at a minimum in concentration camps.
Tulsi Gabbard is a relatively sane leftist person. Thus, she must be banished from the cult.
What’s important is that even the Democrats who balk at all-socialism-all-the-time can’t or won’t say anything about the insane Trump hate. They think they will ride that tiger back to the White House but the GOP can tell you how that game ultimately ends.
Mike
The Weather Underground is going to get the war they wanted and we didn’t believe enough in to stop…
heck… same thing can be said of a lot of the stuff they got away with!
how do you make people believe the population is collapsing before its perceived, which by that time, its way too late to do anything (even less under hostile circumstances)
even when the plan they were given blows up in their face, they dont get they were had, and they run to ground and work the plan!!!!!
the people who can believe the Dems of the south would punish a white person for loving or helping a black person, but do not see why western civ would suffer the same for helping prevent the final solutions finality.
it was “not my experience” that the future president was a White supremacist sympathizer — Kara Young
why doesnt that count? i said, go into the stuff on this, and it explains why blacks cant be racist even if they are more racist… why the above doesn’t count… why my wife not being white, proves i am a racist of the worst stripe…
and a whole freaking lot more – most of it i learned in the late 70s and 80s its so old and UNCHALLENGED so long its TRUTH that has stood the test of time!!!
“I never heard him say a disparaging comment towards any race” — Kara Young
this whole get rid of the men who saved whom was always baked in…
from day one the modern feminist movement hated their mates and they were mostly monolithic ally (and monotonically) white women of privilege.
They learned what to think and how to be impenetrable from school
the school who took over? the school now dominated by and catering to who?
Although the circumstances of why Sharpton became a federal informant are in dispute, he has long acknowledged that he secretly recorded mobsters for the FBI in the 1980s.
Chesimard… you know the aunt of deceased rap legend Tupac Shakur who put rap on the map
[how if the distributors wouldnt distribute?]
Mumia Abu-Jamal? Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin?
Chesimard a former member of the Black Liberation Army, who was convicted of the first-degree murder of State Trooper Werner Foerster during a shootout on the New Jersey Turnpike in 1973.
Oh, the Nanuet Mall Brinks job with the members of weather underground and automatic weapons?
Now, why would they think that music would get the message out… you know, the message Chesimard and Jamil Al-Amin wanted to get heard.. the poetry of Jamil!!!
Now what was Jamil’s name before he became Muslim? (that too? roots that far back?)
ah.. that was H Rap Brown… friend of Stoaky!! not Smokey!!
H rap brown was party leader.. it was his poetry that inspired RAP music (not bebop)
One of the crew was named Odinga after their hero in Kenya.. Guess who’s uncle?
Funny when you know the details…
I feel that “man-hating” is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.
And although there are exceptions (as in everything), i.e., men who are trying to be traitors to their own male class, most men cheerfully affirm their deadly class privileges and power.
And I hate that class. – Robin Morgan
Critical Race Feminism by Theodorea Regina Berry
In: Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies
Critical race feminism is a feminist perspective of critical race theory. As an outgrowth of critical legal studies and critical race theory, critical race feminism acknowledges, accepts, and addresses Black experiences as different from those of critical race theory and feminist theory. Critical race feminism focuses on the issues of power, oppression, and conflict centralized in feminist theory.
How Slavery, Capitalism, and White Supremacy gave rise to…..
White Supremacy + Capitalism = Climate Change
Capitalism spurs white supremacy
White Supremacy and Capitalism: The Two-Headed Dragon
and just so you know where sharpton, and they are taking this…
Imperialist White supremacist capitalist patriarchy Bell Hooks..
Understanding Patriarchy – Bell Hooks
https://imaginenoborders.org/pdf/zines/UnderstandingPatriarchy.pdf
you guys are decades behind the curve.. like the musicians in that Danny Kaye movie who were inside so long they didnt know how music changed while they were discussing it..
Collapse of the black family: Wasn’t that because the Dems changed the welfare regs, and only paid child support if there was no husband, which was an incentive for men to leave?
American Jews are always rationalizing the people that want them dead.
One can be a Democrat and dislike Sharpton. One can be a Republican and dislike Trump. There is no reason to think that one’s particular political beliefs are tied to one politician or pundit. One could argue that Trump is far more tied to what Republicans believe way more than Sharpton because Trump is president while Sharpton is one man with a megaphone. But Republicans can still steer a conservative course and begrudgingly support Trump.
The tiny blip you speak of applies just as well for Trump supporters who tend to overlook some of the very misleading [or false] things Trump says. Every politician lies, true. It’s not endemic to Democrats or Republicans. [I know I’ll get push back on this but I’m trying to be balanced here]. I can’t even listen to politicians or pundits anymore. None of them. They all toe the party line, rarely question their own and demonize the other side with generalizations that I have really grown tired of. Bring back the reasonable moderates.
Words and deeds, montage. Do we see correspondence between the two? What are the deeds advocated by one political actor vs another? Do these proposed actions make sense? Are they then taken as proposed? Are they good, or are they making things worse?
This is where our political judgement must be engaged. Rhetoric matters, to be sure. Yet rhetoric isn’t the point in the end, is it? The point is what is done; what is changed for the better; what good things are preserved from ruinous change?
Deeds, these. This are where we look to answer the test.
Trump does not need the black vote which Democrats always know is theirs and it should never be challenged. However, if more black people have good jobs in the current economy and they feel as if the ‘black leadership’ has used them for their own benefit that might change. Calling out the hucksters and failures of ‘black leadership’ has no downside but it does control the conversation.
It is always relative: your bad guy is worse than our bad guy. Circle the wagons. They simply won’t admit what they know: Sharpton is a bad guy that harms them and their “community”, not least of which is by race baiting and race hustling. Admitting that doesn’t say anything about Trump.
As if on cue Instapundit posts (at 9:00pm) a link to a Conrad Black article precisely on point regarding Pres. Trump. The link: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/conrad-black-the-inconvenient-truth-about-trump-hes-doing-what-he-said-he-would
And a (generous) quote from the piece:
Neo,
Thanks for this post. I hadn’t heard from Glenn Loury in a long time (couldn’t bring up the linked Times article, though). I remember back in the day when Dr. Loury was writing (not infrequently) for Commentary and First Things. Back then, Norman Podhoretz (sp?) was editing Commentary and Fr. Neuhaus, First Things. Dr. Loury was on the masthead at FT for years, and Fr. Neuhaus seemed quite fond of him. I have a vague recollection of Dr. Loury making a go of mending things with Jesse Jackson and his minions, and in the process breaking with his old (neo)-conservative allies, whereupon Mr. Podhoretz bluntly took him to task in one of his rambling, spirited essays (published in Commentary, I believe; maybe NR). Either way, Dr. Loury is a man with a spine.
(Perhaps Dr. Lowry mentioned some of the above in his Times piece. If so, my bad.)
Leftism is, among many other things, a religion—indeed, a fundamentalist religion—and HateTrump groupthink is currently one of its non-negotiable articles of faith (if not THE litmus test as to whether a believer is truly practicing the True Faith, or not. Or maybe it’s the sanctitiy of Planned Parenthood. Whatever.)
Sort of reminds me of when Rolling Stone magazine started publishing album reviews. Wannabe hipsters—all twenty zillion of them, by my count– would follow the tastes of the Stone’s “rock critics” over a cliff, if it came to that. After one or two unflattering RS reviews, a gifted artist might be effectively marginalized for years, if not decades. But the inspired Word was out, and etched in stone (pun not intended).
I will vigorously disagree with sdferr’s approval of Black’s remarks, viz., “Trump’s record has been the best of any U.S. president since Calvin Coolidge (1923-1929), who promised, and did, nothing, in the piping days of American isolationism, Prohibition and complete absence of requirements for collateral in borrowing to buy equities. (This was a bi-partisan policy trifecta that eventually gave us Al Capone, Hitler, the Great Depression and the Second World War.).”
Seldom have I read a statement so unfactual. OK, so Black says we, not he, gave us Capone aka bootleggers, but that was the people’s will by Amendment. He surely did not give us Hitler; the Treaty of Versailles did that. He surely cannot be given sole blame for the Depression, any more than Trump should get sole credit for making American life better, and Coolidge had zip to do with the genesis of WWII, which was birthed by WWI, the Russian Bolshevik revolution and its global communist ambitions.
artfldgr
And I hate that class. – Robin Morgan
I recently read Mark Rudd’s memoir [Underground: My Life with SDS and the Weathermen]. To refresh memories, Mark Rudd got his 15 minutes of fame by being the spokesman for the Columbia students occupying President Grayson Kirk’s office in the spring of 1968. Rudd wrote that he suspected fellow weather person Jane Alpert of fingering him to the FBI when he was on the run. BTW, Rudd also wrote that Jane Alpert was, for a time, Robin Morgan’s lover.
Rudd writes from the perspective of four decades later.
According to Rudd, SDS had great goals- we just didn’t do it right.
Anyone who opposed the Vietnam War who doesn’t also feel at least some ambivalence for that opposition stemming from the genocide in Cambodia is,in my opinion at least, rather blind.
Sharpton has been Dem kingmaker in NYC politics for a long time. In 2000 Joe Leibermann had to go kiss his boots to get the VP nomination. If the Dems were going to noominate a Jew, their leading antisemite had to give him a pass. I remember thinking “It profiteth a man not Joseph to sell his soul for the world, but for the Vice-Presidency?”
Given the harm done to blacks by charlatans like Sharpton and other black “leaders,” they really should be given honorary titles and membership into the KKK (how about Honorary Grand Klaxons ?).
In terms of destroying the black family (multi-generational destruction) and ensuring that inner city blacks have educational opportunities that are probably the worst of any place on earth, the policies and antics promoted by Sharpton and other black “leaders,” make the racist KKK policies look inept, incompetent and ineffective.
A good example of anti-black policies promoted by Sharpton, the NAACP (National Assoc. Against Colored People), other black “leaders,” and white liberal progressive elites is their opposition to charter schools.
They are happy to guarantee that inner city black high school “graduates,” remain, for all intents and purposes, functionally illiterate and mathematically ignorant and totally lacking in any skills; all to placate the leftist radical teacher’s union.
Incredible as it seems, many of the top teacher’s union official are black. Their actions are analogous with that of the Jewish Kapos in Hitler’s death camps.
Malcolm X warned blacks about white liberal elites and how their policies were harmful to blacks. His warned that their policies required that blacks become subservient to their white “benefactors,” and it discouraged blacks from taking appropriate initiatives to improve their own circumstances.
Unfortunately his warning was not heeded.
The reaction to Trump’s comments about Baltimore and Elijah Cummings, you will note, allows Trump’s critics to totally avoid the subject matter and target of Trump’s comments; the horrible conditions extant in Baltimore and the total incompetence and/or purposeful negligence of Cummings.
Really, what has he actually ACCOMPLISHED for his district during his 24 years of Congressional “attendance?(yea, he shows up to job but does ZERO other than collect a paycheck).
As long as blacks repeatedly vote to return total incompetents like Cummings (and Sheila Jackson, Maxine Waters, et. al.) to office, things will just further deteriorate.
Black “leaders” and black members of Congress are for the most part nothing more than house n*****s for white, elitist, multi-millionaire liberal progressives and/or white progressive politicians.
Unfortunately, the average black citizen is the one paying the price for the selfish, self-serving policies of their leaders.
What a shame.
Collapse of the black family: Wasn’t that because the Dems changed the welfare regs, and only paid child support if there was no husband, which was an incentive for men to leave?
Originally, the program was aid for widows and orphans. It was later called “AFDC” and also implied the father was dead or gone, leaving the mother and child at risk. The explosion of black out of wedlock birth took off after 1965. Soon young black girls figured out (or were told) that having a baby was a ticket to their own apartment and income. The rest is history,
A good example of anti-black policies promoted by Sharpton, the NAACP (National Assoc. Against Colored People), other black “leaders,” and white liberal progressive elites is their opposition to charter schools.
The teachers ‘ unions have become a cash cow for Democrats as trade unions have declined. “I will care about children when they begin to pay union dues.” Albert Shanker AFT peresident.
I’m a huge fan of Glenn Loury and I recommend that everyone listen to his sophisticated and illuminating podcasts on Bloggingheads — especially the dialogues with John McWhorter. You might have noticed that one of the NYT comments links stories about Loury’s own earlier behavior, and it’s true, he was a troubled, sinful man in earlier years. The difference between him and the disgusting Al Sharpton is that he has honestly acknowledged his failings and struggled to come to terms with them. His intellectual history is full of twists and turns — a testimony to how he’s kept his mind alive over many years. An honest, thoughtful man with a deep, soulful charm. He’s in the process of writing a memoir that I’m looking forward very much to reading. Look out for it!
On blacks voting for the likes of Cummings/Waters decade after decade . . .
Why wouldn’t they? They’re basically voting for freebies and not having to take much responsibility except to collect said freebies.
Their vote is only part of the whole picture , , , white guilt, black grievance hucksters who milk that guilt, black voters who vote them in to keep the gravy train rolling. If only they were happy with that. But unearned handouts never make for a proud recipient, but only enrage him/her.
We can see the violent response when that whole paradigm is challenged.
A supply chain auditor has her say.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSJgnKcXVLE&t
DNW, wow. That is one smart, well-informed and impassioned lady. Thanks for the link.
Love Patricia Dickson. Everyone of her videos is worth listening to.
And what a complexion! On my best day I never had that glow.
Gringo,
Thanks for calling attention to the New Rudd, basically same as the Old Rudd. It wasn’t that the goal was wrong, it’s just that they went about it wrong.
I guess he wavered on the road to Damascus, and then turned around and went back.
David Horowitz has told us that Rudd, Gitlin, Hayden are not being as open and honest about their pasts and presents as could be wished.