Home » SCOTUS rules on wall funding injunction case

Comments

SCOTUS rules on wall funding injunction case — 7 Comments

  1. By now we know to a certainty “What I was walling in or walling out,”… We are walling out the really wretched refuse of their teeming barrios. And we need it not since we already have many wretched barrios right here. Let’s get rocking before we have to include machine guns.

  2. An actual “really big victory” would be a case in which the Supreme Court eliminated the ability of every rinky-dink lower court to issue injunctions of nationwide effect, intended to thwart President Trump’s agenda and actions.

  3. I focused on Breyer, too. I thought he described the “do we or don’t we” injunction conundrum very well.

  4. Since it did not issue an opinion setting out its reasoning, the majority appear to have agreed completely with the Administration’s Application for Stay. This case was yet another attempt by the Left to impede Trump’s agenda with frivolous litigation. The lawsuit was initiated by the ACLU, using the Sierra Club as an aggrieved plaintiff whose members might be denied their recreational and aesthetic opportunities on a strip of land along the southern border. The Application for Stay stress that such “harm” was insignificant when compared to the security of the country. Hopefully, this decision is the beginning of the Supreme Court clamping down on frivolous lawsuits from blue states whose only purpose to hamper Trump.

  5. Democrats to minorities is like Avenatti to Stormy Daniels, claiming to be their helper, then steal from them.

  6. Still nothing being done about the lowest Fed district courts issuing nationwide injunctions. The latest outrage is Obama judge Tigar in CA issuing a nationwide ‘temporary restraining order’ against the administration’s asylum policy after another local court said it was OK. All the Left has to do is fund one judge and they can stop anything they want.

    If the Right had any b*lls, conservative district judges would start issuing their own nationwide injunctions. For example against all state laws that allow abortion in the final trimester. IANAL but this is makes legal sense since these laws are far beyond the guidelines of Roe and Casey. But of course if wishes were …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>