Home » Passover: a celebration of freedom

Comments

Passover: a celebration of freedom — 19 Comments

  1. Last year I celebrated Passover in Paradise (Soon to be a major motion picture with that title.) Celebrated it with a one of my oldest and dearest friends. We had, I recall, a bit of a time getting everything we needed for Passover in Paradise but we prevailed.

    It was a great Passover marked by the endless waiting for the real food to arrive after the bitter herbs….

  2. “I think there’s another very basic need, one that perhaps can only really be appreciated when it is lost: liberty.”

    I once believed liberty or the desire for self-determination to be universal as well and that is true for some percentage of people. But some people want to be told what to do.

    I suspect the more inclined someone is to be group oriented, the less important liberty is to them with the caveat that few enjoy being abused. So perhaps they want a benevolent mommy and daddy figure.

    I reached that conclusion after seeing the neocon failure to implant democracy into the M.E.

    An analogy that IMO does a fair job of explaining the human spectrum is presented by the old John Ford/John Wayne calvary movies like “She Wore a Yellow Ribbon”. As the regiment leaves the fort, Wayne is the leader, his lieutenants are his middle managers, the NCO’s the shop supervisors and the privates and corporals the skilled workforce. The regiment’s scouts are the individuals who most value liberty, necessarily self-reliant but part of the mini-society. As long as the troops retain confidence in their leadership, they’re content to have that leadership make the decisions with liberty essentially absent.

    BTW, I think that a high percentage of conservative/libertarian types are ‘scouts’. They resonate to Groucho Marx’s wonderful maxim; when asked what clubs and organizations he belonged to, he opined that he would never join any group whose standards were so low as to wish him to be a member… and if that doesn’t bring an understanding smile to your face, then you are not a scout type.

  3. “Freedom vs. bread is a false dichotomy. Dostoevsky was writing before the Soviets came to power, but now we have learned that lack of freedom, and a “planned” economy, is certainly no guarantee of bread (just ask the Ukrainians).” – Neo

    Hits close to home.

    Just recently made acquaintance with a man who left Ukraine shortly after the wall fell.

    When I asked what was his first impression of the west / US, he named the local grocery chain.

    He said that back in the Ukraine you had a store, just for bread, one for cheese, one for meat, etc.

    He explained that our local grocery store offered an incredible variety while the one in his home city provided one or two types.

    As for meat, it was usually gone by the time they arrived to purchase, as the employees stole it and sold it privately. That’s how people survived.

    Not far from the description of Cuba today, here…
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cuba-after-fidel-castro-full-of-life-but-it-is-life-on-the-brink-of-death/article/2619841

    And is a near identical story for people I’ve met who escaped (when that was the only way out of) countries like Poland, Russia, etc..

  4. “Is freedom a “basic need, then?” – Neo

    Is it a “need”, or is it our “nature”?

    We have a contrived system to put some limits on it, and we hope it can withstand the temptation of many (good or bad intentioned, individually or as a majority) to abuse the power we vested in that system.
    .

    “We’ve also seen threats to liberty in our own country, despite its long tradition of liberty and the importance Americans used to place on it. I fear those days may be over.”

    Scalia used to say “It’s the structure, stupid!”
    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/the-conservative-pipeline-to-the-supreme-court

    So long as we don’t want to respect our original structure, and we want shortcuts to get our way, your fears will pan out, as that structure continues to erode.

    However, I don’t think it inevitable.
    .

    We see the threat on the left, but, right now, it just seems that many on “our” side are confused as to what “ideas” it is we should be “arguing” for.

    Some want MORE government (in the name of their favorite issue), yet argue for more freedom.

    Cannot have it both ways.

    And, the power to do the MORE that they advocate, is the very same power that can be used by the left (or anyone else for their own benefit).

    We have to realize that the more we ask the government to do, the more power we place in the hands of others.

    We have to realize that the more we weaken the rules to make it easier to “get things done”, the easier it is for someone without our interests in mind to “get their will”.

    It is not inevitable, but we’ve got to be thinking more along these lines, and seek to persuade others of the same, so that we can elect representative who will oblige us on this.

  5. So you missed Josh Mintz’s piece at Haaretz.com

    He says there is no evidence what so ever that Jews were ever enslaved in Egypt. The logical inference is, then, that the whole Passover thing is a lie.

    No real surprise as it comes from Haaretz. As extreme Left as can be.

  6. Tuvea,

    If the Jews were never enslaved in Egypt, then Moses could never have led them out of bondage. No miraculous plagues, no parting of the red sea, no burning bush that is not consumed by the fire on Mt. Sinai and NO Ten Commandments… thus no justification for Isreal.

    It’s about invalidating Judaism and by default, Christianity too.

  7. Big Maq,

    Years ago a friend, whose wife is Eastern European and whose adopted daughter is from Romania told me of putting up a visitor from a former communist nation, right after the Soviet Union fell. My friend told of exactly the same reaction when he brought along his visitor on a quick trip to the local grocery store. He said the man was stunned at the variety and abundance and disbelieving of his own eyes, thinking it a trick, until assured that it was the norm in the West. The clincher was when my friend volunteered to take him around to see as many grocery stores in the area as he might wish until he’d confirmed it to his own satisfaction.

    Venezuela is the most recent proof of socialism’s bankruptcy but they cannot let go of their delusions.

  8. @GB – one of my other early coworkers was Russian and told me all kinds of stories.

    HIS first impression was “color!”.

    He made his way into Italy, and was amazed at the signage, the clothing, the cars, the hair, etc..

    We take for granted these things, and involve ourselves with the trivialities of life (aka First World Problems) that few of us can relate, nor imagine.
    .

    Incidentally, for a different flavor, another I met from Brazil says “order” is their first impression. That is, folks actually stand in a line, drive between the lines, respect the traffic lights, etc..

    Definitely several steps ahead of the Iron Curtain folks, but clearly reflects a social disorder, a lack of trust to be treated “fairly”.
    .

    Yes, Venezuela is a self-inflicted tragedy.

  9. It is remarkable how truly swinish and immoral John Eff Kerrry is and has been, and how he has been politically promoted by the Good (sarc off) People of Massachusetts.

  10. I have heard the current opinion out there that there is no historical evidence link ing the Jews to an actual enslavement in Egypt, and my response is so what? It s the *story* that speaks to the heart of people, same thing with those who deny Christ’s resurrection, it is intended to inspire on a transcendent level. To raise us above a merely human level and show us through much suffering what we are capable of. They are great lessons with triumphant endings. We need this and not an ending like 1984.

  11. “But some people want to be told what to do.” – GB

    How about this angle?….
    .

    Humanity seems very much heavily weighted toward the risk-averse.

    People are uncomfortable / fearful taking risks (real and perceived).

    Some have more tolerance than others.

    Some situations motivate them more than others to take risks, or, opposite, to step back.

    Taking risks is also harder / more involved, and carries responsibilities if the results turn south.
    .

    Is it that people “want” to be told what to do, or is it that they DON’T WANT to “stick out their necks”?

    This may LOOK very much like “wanting to be told”, but actually isn’t.

    They are just agreeable to “it”, whatever “it” is at the time.
    .

    This, of course, is a simplification of something much more complex going on with each person, with multiples of variables, influences, and biographies that impact each.

    Don’t know if there is an existing theory on this, so don’t know if there is any proper terminology to describe it better.

    Anyway, food for thought.

  12. G.B.: “This, of course, is a simplification of something much more complex going on with each person, with multiples of variables, influences, and biographies that impact each.
    Don’t know if there is an existing theory on this, so don’t know if there is any proper terminology to describe it better.”

    Steven Pinker’s book, “The Blank Slate: The modern Denial of Human Nature,” has quite a lot to say about this. He identifies five personality traits that are basic to all humans.
    For example: extroverted – shy. All of us lie somewhere on the line between being very extroverted and extremely shy. He believes these are genetic inheritances and can be changed somewhat by parental influence/education, but that a shy person can never become an extrovert.

    Another example: aggressive – passive.
    Aggression can be channeled either for good or ill, but an aggressive person will never become passive.
    The other three traits are:
    open minded – closed minded
    conscientious – careless
    neurotic – emotionally stable

    He might not be totally correct, but when you think about human behavior, it appears that much of it is inherited and largely unchangeable/unmodifiable.

  13. Interesting, I can tell you from experience that a pre menopausal woman can go from passive to aggressive, once that estrogen gets knock ed back lol although you actually referred to an aggressive person becoming passive.
    Another trait humans have is Tribalism, for better or worse we feel more comfortable with those who are most similar. I believe this arose as a defense mechanism, to be wary of the stranger. It’s not racism as tribes of the same race can consider *others* reason for concern. And indeed we can be harmed, murdered, robbed, beaten by those we trusted, but I think something innate has to be overcome to finally have a confident acceptance of someone who is in look and manner unfamiliar. ( just my 2 cents)x

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>