Trump ♥ Trump
If you liked Obama, you’ll love Trump. Why? Because what we need more than anything else is another self-aggrandizing narcissist who thinks he’s the best at everything:
I actually have a great relationship with people. In fact, I was criticized in the beginning because I get along with Democrats and liberals and Republicans and conservatives ”” I get along with everybody.
Actually, you were criticized because you supported, contributed money to, and praised liberals and leftists such as Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, among many many others. And no, you don’t “get along with everybody.” See this*, and note that you have the highest unfavorability rating of all the candidates, and that includes Hillary Clinton, who’s also rather high on that score.
More from Trump on Trump:
“My judgment is great,” Trump said. “I built a multi-multi-multi-billion-dollar company, some of the greatest assets in the world, tremendously big, No. 1 bestsellers, including ”˜The Art of the Deal’ ”” which may be the biggest and best in terms of the business books ”” tremendous television show called ‘The Apprentice’ that lasted for 14 seasons.”
Well, then, let’s elect George Soros! Or Mitt Romney (ooops). Or perhaps Jeff Probst.
[NOTE: * That linked article has a title that makes it seem as though it’s about Trump’s divorce from Ivana, but that’s not why I linked it and that’s not what interests me. In fact, it just so happens that several people with whom Trump does get along are his various ex-wives. But there are plenty of other people in that article who’ve had dealings with him who do not have good things to say about him or about his machinations in the business world.
Trump himself certainly doesn’t get along with everyone. He likes to jab at people, especially anyone who is a rival. And he likes to sue people; whatever the merits of his various and sundry lawsuits might be (and I leave that up to you to decide), they are certainly not evidence of “getting along with everyone” (see also this for an idea of just how litigious he is). But he also likes to tell us what a great guy he is and how he gets along with everyone. Ah, it’s all good, right? It’s Trump!]
[NOTE II: I think I wrote this post mainly because I ♥ to make the hearts sign.]
Somewhere I read today that he is now talking about all his Muslim friends that support him.
But what if it really truly actually does come down to a choice between a “self-aggrandizing narcissist who thinks he’s the best at everything:” and “self-aggrandizing narcissist who thinks she’s the best at everything”?
Trump is a buffoon but a buffoon with his finger firmly planted upon the issues that most threaten the republic. That is the source of his support.
Given the death grip that the leftist ‘narrative’ has upon Western Civilization, a “bull in a china shop” approach is clearly necessary to break through the “Gordian Knot” of political correctness that the Left has constructed.
addendum: Even should Cruz continue to surge ahead and win the nomination, something to be greatly desired, Trump will have prepared the ground for discussion of the issues at levels that otherwise never would have been permitted.
The Left greatly desires that ‘we go into the night’, quietly…
And yet who among Trump’s supporters is surprised that Trump would seize upon a leftist’s hollow talking point to criticize Justice Scalia in order to pander to an African-American audience? And if surprised, will reexamination of their prior views be the next considerations these Trump supporters take? If so, good for them. If not, well then, join the political left.
Geoffrey Britain:
I wish Trump were merely a “buffoon.” I see him as far more than that, and far more dangerous.
neo, I think you are right. Trump seems to have found a way to turn off the functioning brain cells of rabid Trumpsters.
The Donald is just plain scary.
He makes populist pronouncements to gain crowd appeal with no substantive plans, or prior history of supporting actions to reduce the corrosive influence of government. He clearly operates in real time, with little preparation. His politics do not appear to be based on conservative, or even mderate principles that could guide his actions. If criticized he attacks with fury and smart remarks rather than cogent fact based arguments. What would his leadership actually bring, more power for real estate developers?
Carson and Cruz are much more intelligent and trustworthy to not “go native” if elected.
Given Name DONALD
GENDER: Masculine
USAGE: Scottish, English
PRONOUNCED: DAHN-əld (English) [key]
Meaning & History
From the Gaelic name Domhnall which means “ruler of the world”, composed of the old Celtic elements dumno “world” and val “rule”.
Deal with it!
he gets along with who he works with, and thats not us… thffffpppttt…
but then again, reagan was a buffoon seen as dangerous…
This Buffoon’s a Winner
Hill Spill
By Matthew H. Joseph, March 12, 1986
When Democrats dismiss Reagan as a “buffoon,” they simply demonstrate their ignorance of the powerful changes in public opinion that helped Reagan win office and have supported a string of successes during his administration.
and if that is not enough
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19880517&id=QxwhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=WWMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5338,219403&hl=en
Reagan is still killing us: How his dangerous “American exceptionalism” haunts us today – Salon
oh and the dangerous label was also given by the gay community…
funny the recycled stuff i could find…
I will temporarily refrain from questioning the mindset of the trumpsters. I have no animosity towards them, I simply find their support mindboggling. However, the donald remains fair game. trump is far more than a buffoon and has much in common with the messiah. And, he is not a proverbial bull in a china shop. He is merely a megalomaniac. Just what we don’t need to return to a republic under the rule of law, not men.
Today: Rush Limbaugh: Trump’s un-conservative attack on Ted Cruz raised a red flag for me
It’s mind boggling to see all the emotion that is spilling out/boiling over between the Trump supporters and those who dislike the man.
I am not emotionally invested in any of the candidates yet. My early faves were Walker, Jindal, and Fiorina. Only one still standing and Carly’s not doing too well. Do I know how to pick ’em or what?
On the Donald I have mixed emotions. I detest his presentation – loud, pushy, New Yawkah with an overblown ego. Yet, the man has real accomplishments on his resume. He can EXECUTE: big real estate deals, construction of huge buildings, construction of sports and entertainment complexes, international deals, etc.
If he could get control of his ego, learn to think before he speaks, rein in his competitveness just a tad etc. (Probably won’t happen), he might do a pretty good job as President.
The Presidency is a multifaceted job. It requires a titanium backbone, the wisdom of Solomon, the speaking ability of a Churchill, a solid grounding in executive functions, a heart that can love all the citizens, and much more. Trump ain’t that person. But come to think of it, I don’t see anyone else who quite measures up to all those qualities either. Cruz comes close. Carson just can’t deliver in the orator department. Rubio doesn’t have the gravitas. Carly comes close – why isn’t she doing better?
Anyhow, I’m watching and not going to get over invested in anyone until after the March primaries are finished.
Many people are upset/outraged that someone like Trump can actually be a candidate for President. I’m not nearly as outraged by Trump as I am by the fact that a mendacious, conniving person of little or no accomplishment like HRC can be considered a serious candidate. Now that’s something to get outraged about.
I don’t want Trump to be the candidate for the GOP, but I’m not nearly as emotionally invested against him as to say I would not vote for him.
neo…
Real estate players have all the charm and discretion of a honey badger.
Compared to his peers – Donald is virtually a saint.
You’ll have a longer trek than Diogenes should you attempt to find a wholesome soul in real estate development.
The real reason most other politicians fear Trump: they see their OWN faults in him.
Now THAT’s fear and loathing in Washington DC.
blert:
Well, if Trump was running for the position of Mr. Congeniality of the real estate players, he’d certainly get my vote.
But he’s not.
J.J.:
You write: “If he could get control of his ego, learn to think before he speaks, rein in his competitveness just a tad…”
I’m sorry to say this, but there is virtually no chance of the first or the third on that list happening. Look at Trump’s entire life, from start to the present, and his ego and his competitiveness have been astronomical. These are character traits that are baked in the Trump cake. They are responsible for his success in his chosen field, and they’re pretty much perfect for that. But not for the job of president.
As for the “thinking before he speaks” part—sometimes Trump doesn’t think that much before he speaks, but in my opinion he’s thinking before (or at least as) he speaks more often than not. He knows exactly what he’s doing, and he’s out to raise himself up and destroy anyone who gets in his way, as well as to throw red meat to his populist hordes and say what they want him to say.
I’m beginning to believe that Trump/Cruz is the best ticket we can get this time around.
I think Trump has the best chance of winning the general election of any of the potential Republicans, since he appeals to LIVs, who, let’s face it, are a sizable portion of the electorate. (And the Democrats don’t have a monopoly on them, either.)
Cruz would be handy to have around, since he would hopefully curb Trump’s excesses: “No, Donald, you can’t do that! It’s unconstitutional!”
Had been wondering what it would take for Limbaugh (and Levin) to finally get smacked in the face by Trump’s remarks. Today was that day.
I didn’t hear Limbaugh, but tonight Levin was telling Trump to knock it off, because the media wants him and Cruz to attack each other, and he was playing into their hands.
I hope both Trump’s and Cruz’s “people” were listening. We’ll probably know in tomorrow’s debate.
Neo, I threw those qualifiers in because that’s what I think would have to happen for him to have a chance at doing a decent job as President. Do I think he would change? Nope, which is one reason I don’t want to see him get the nomination.
rickl: “I think Trump has the best chance of winning the general election of any of the potential Republicans, since he appeals to LIVs, who, let’s face it, are a sizable portion of the electorate.” Some of the GOPe (Krautheimer just tonight) think Trump will lose worse than Goldwater and destroy the GOP for a decade. So there’s that. Lots of predictions – not much clarity yet.
Levin was equally disgusted with Trump’s leftist approaches on all three of the issues raised 1) claiming Cruz is a maniac for calling out Sen. McConnell’s lying, 2) attacking Scalia with leftist pandering on affirmative action, and 3) pandering on ridiculous subsidies for corn-based ethanol production — not simply with Trump’s acquiescence to leftist journalist’s promptings. Any clear-eyed conservative wouldn’t have taken Trump’s stance on any of those three questions.
Judge trump upon his past, and you find a snake oil merchant willing to mouth whatever it takes to fill his purse. That is (somehwat) acceptable in the private sector When it comes to presidential politics, its more or less messiah politics reprise. How is that not obvious?
I have mentioned in the comments before that Trump is a fool. But I do want to thank him for one thing. He is forcing the establishment to back someone they cant stand.
Beyond Trump the only person who seems to capture any real enthusiasm is Cruz. Who I have always liked but thought would never get traction. But it appears many “mainstream” people are starting to realize he may be the only one who can get votes from both sides of the Republican isle.
To me he is clearly the most desirable of the candidates left. And if he is smart enough he will make Florina number two on the ticket.
She is the only business person left in the field. She is excellent staying on message and appears to be one of the better debaters of the group. I think she would make an excellent contrast on background to Cruz. But has a similar overall outlook and style in comparison.
I think it’s all “name recognition” right now.
Trump’s negatives are very high.
Trump’s positives are low.
For me, I hope to see Trump’s polling numbers collapse. He’s the anti-thesis of conservative.
Conservatives are family oriented, in favor of personal responsibiity. The only personal responsibility that Trump exhibits is his ability to avoid it. He is crass, and his speeches do not have substance.
The Trumpster is driving a dumpster through the GOP elites. They don’t know how to campaign against him, how to run ads against him, and especially how to kill his insurgency. They knocked off Cain with his 9-9-9 plan in short order. They killed Newt in Florida (bye-bye our invite to the Inauguration Ball). But Trump? They are running around in circles squawking like chickens. (link for neo)
Anyone watching this race who thinks Trump is a buffoon, a fool or an idiot doesn’t play chess.
But is he in it for real? He has a massive ego, although he is surprisingly self-deprecating at his rallies. Who needs the worst job on Earth when you are worth billions? Not Trump. This whole deal is costing him money. So, why would he bother?
Here’s my answer. He’s basically a Tea Party guy. He sees we are drowning in debt. He sees we are losing jobs. He sees Obamacare is yet another big government disaster. He knows almost all politicians are corrupted by their power. He sees us losing abroad. He sees us losing in trade. He sees the regulatory state is out of control and he’s had enough. That’s his basic message. So, God Damn it, he’s going to stop making more billions and do something about it.
Plus, he does cross-over. Why does he hammer Ford for building a plant in Mexico? UAW anyone?
I have to give him a big fat pandering negative for supporting ethanol in Iowa while attacking Cruz. That went over very poorly in this Tea Party household. His tax plan would kill all subsidies, including ethanol, but he didn’t tell the Iowa folk that truth. If Trump becomes a regular politician, he will lose.
Basically a Tea Party guy. You’ve got to be kidding. Where was he in 2010 when rallies filled DC:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/15/tea-party-protesters-descend-dc-new-contract-america.html
Until this year, THIS YEAR, he had nothing to say about Obamacare. He was too busy attending parties, inviting the Clintons to weddings, and otherwise being the typical fat cat donor to Democrat politicians like Chuck Schumer.
Trump is a mirage. He’s a political opportunist playing on the desperation of conservatives to stop the cultural and political destruction of our country. He will not quit until he has destroyed everyone blocking his path to power and more fame.
Trump is no mirage. He’s a bona fide deal-maker. Like Jacob. And his brother-followers are famished, like Esau. Boy has he gotta ‘uge bowl of lentil soup for them.
He’ll make the trains run on time; like that guy in Italy during the second great war.
KLSmith…
There is great irony in your quip.
Mussolini made the trains run on time by being HONEST about the train schedules.
He insisted that the train management stop BSing about arrivals.
Without Hitler, Mussolini would’ve gone down in history as a virtually harmless buffoon… the Old World’s version of Peron.
His greatest mistake was letting Gramsci set pen to paper.
His “African Adventure” was a mortal sin. From Libya to Ethiopia — he was an expansionist tyrant.
Strangely, it was the Italians that “invented” the Concentration Camp. For it was in Libya that the term gained currency.
Strange, no?
The original intent was to concentrate the civilians ( the women and kids ) from the fighting zone — the Sahara ‘back country’ — so that the Italian army could fire freely at anyone on the presumption that non-combatants were in the concentration camps.
Today, those same camps would be termed refugee camps — and there are a few just south of the Syrian border every bit in the image of those from Italian campaign in Libya.
Mussolini thought that Libya would be to Italy what Algeria was to France. And, after a fashion, it was. Both proved to be Muslim curses.
Virtually everything the French experienced in the 50’s the Italians had pre-peated in the 20’s.
Curiously, the French army never much took notice as to how intractable the fighting can be with Muslims in the desert.
But, that’s a military truism. Armies never learn from other armies — unless they happen to be directly fighting them.
You may note that all of the jihadis of ISIS now ape the US Army’s doctrine WRT small arms portage.
@The Other Chuck: My wife just got off a Tea Party conference call. The subject? Helping Trump and becoming Trump delegates.
<blert Says:
December 15th, 2015 at 10:44 pm
Strangely, it was the Italians that “invented” the Concentration Camp. For it was in Libya that the term gained currency.
Suggest you look into: boer war concentration camps
and, The Civil War Concentration Camps: Andersonville.
Much of the proceeding of the American Civil war were a portent of the industrial scale 20th century conflicts.
Curiously, the French army never much took notice as to how intractable the fighting can be with Muslims in the desert.
Actually the French succeeded with the ‘pacification’ but DeGaulle [rightly] pulled the plug.
He realized that the birth rate imbalance would lead to disaster if native Algerian had full French citizenship.
See: David Galula counterinsurgency warfare theory and practice…
Armies never learn from other armies – unless they happen to be directly fighting them.
You may note that all of the jihadis of ISIS now ape the US Army’s doctrine WRT small arms portage.
Yup!