Home » News roundup on San Bernardino

Comments

News roundup on San Bernardino — 14 Comments

  1. Some people think the contamination of the crime scene was almost directed by Obama.

    And leaving the passports and what not? odd.

  2. Say, who was the Secretary of State when the U.S. Embassy issued Malik a visa? But I guess “at this point, what difference does it make?”

  3. Still hear reports that Law Enforcement do not believe that they were part of some terror related group. I wonder if those middle eastern men who repeatedly showed up at the bomb factory, at all hours of the night, were there to play pinochle? Did they notice anything? Nothing to see here? No clue? Anybody interested in who they are?

    The family has lawyered up, and the lawyers are saying the family “saw nothing, heard nothing, knew nothing”. Again, did they ever visit the arsenal disguised as a home? How did the murdering Cretins explain it? Toys for the infant?

    I think mushrooms are treated with more respect than the American people.

  4. Addendum: I fully understand why Law Enforcement will not, and should not, tell all they know; and what their plan is. That being the case, everyone, including Politicians, their operatives, and the media should just shut up with the inane comments.

  5. ABC News has a photo of the wife.

    In the text, it says she wore a full burqa.

    Did none of Farook’s workplace acquaintances who said they saw no signs of anything amiss ever meet his wife? If they did, seems to me the full burqa would have been/should have been at least slightly disturbing.

  6. Ann:

    I don’t think anyone ever met the wife except the family. They said that they only saw her with a burqa, too.

    She managed to shed her burqa for combat gear in the end, though.

  7. It’s weird that law enforcement would let the landlord open the house to the media. Most crime scene investigations (such as a bomb factory, planning center, etc.) are kept under wraps until the case is iron clad and nothing further could be learned from the scene. Was this a mistake by the FBI/Sheriff? Seems that way.

    The family lawyers are probably being paid by CAIR. They seem to have an unusual interest in doing PR on it. And this is a PR move at this time. I.E. “Don’t blame we Muslims for this.” I would think CAIR could have hired better legal eagles than these two, but who knows.

    Challenging Second Amendment rights at every chance is another big loser for the dems. Yesterday, our evening news here in The People’s Republic of Puget Sound had a feature interviewing people who were buying guns as a result of San Bernardino. That, in a very, very blue state. There is change in the air……..hopefully.

  8. Crime scenes are often sealed for weeks. In a federal investigation involving the murder of 14 and 21 wounded, it is suspicious that the crime scene was left unsealed mere days after the attack. Thus, conspiracy theories are born.

  9. Background checks need to be thorough, no matter how long it takes – oh, wait, we’re talking about immigration background checks, not gun background checks? In that case, background checks are un-American, and you’re a bigot for bringing them up.

  10. Honest to God, I was more upset reading about all that evidence being spoiled than I was when the attack was unfolding. (I was at work so I didn’t see it live.) I have never heard of anything like that happening. It goes against everything I’ve ever heard about police investigations.

    Conspiracy theories? Try this on for size: Whether the order came from the head of the FBI, the Attorney General, or Obama himself, this investigation is being spiked. The government does not want the American people to know about the true extent of this plot.

    And I don’t know which is more frightening; the fact that the investigation is being spiked or that they wanted to make sure we know it.

    The same day, AG Lynch made her statement to the effect that their priority is protecting Muslims from attacks by outraged Americans.

    The federal government has been heavily infiltrated by Muslim Brotherhood operatives. They are in the law enforcement agencies and the intelligence agencies. There is nothing they would like more than if a “white militia” blew up a mosque or something. Then they can really go to town on us.

    But for now, the official story is just that this one couple became “radicalized” and committed an act of “workplace violence”.

    No terrorist cell. No mosques implicated. Move along, nothing to see here.

  11. Obama sez:
    “”We are Americans. We will uphold our values — a free and open society. We are strong. And we are resilient. And we will not be terrorized.”
    Be comforted.

  12. I’m with rickl.

    It appears that this contaminating the crime scene is the doing of the Feds and that they cut the locals out of the communication chain prior to doing so. One suggested reason is that a criminal investigation would compromise some intelligence asset in place (or something like that). However, ass-covering (or treason…because at this point, I’m not sure it’s possible to tell the difference) is always the more likely explanation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>