Home » There may not have been any KKK at Mizzou, but the poop swastika…

Comments

There may not have been any KKK at Mizzou, but the poop swastika… — 25 Comments

  1. Note well that the Jewish students did not call for resignations and lead protests.

    The student body president should be impeached. Prove he is not immune due to race.

    I always thought Mizzou students were tough.

  2. DNA would likely only help authorities determine who donated the ‘artistic’ material which might not be the artist. I remain as puzzled as anyone as to why no photographs were taken given the ubiquity of digital photographic devices. In the absence of such documentation I’m still left with a slight bit of doubt .. was the smear self-evidently a swastika, or was that the observer’s interpretation of something ambiguous?

  3. Even if there was an actual poop swastika, the incident doesn’t pass the ‘smell test’.

    Not only is there a long history of hate crime hoaxes on campus (as NEO has referenced in earlier posts), but it is the Left who is obsessed with poop. There have been so many incidents of this that blogger Bookworm has been documenting it for years (see: http://tinyurl.com/o2om5a2).

    Sorry, I just don’t see a white supremacist/KKK person depicting their own symbol in poop; would think they would show a teensy bit more respect for it.

  4. i should have put the police poop report link here.. but it wasnt here when that was there, so now its not here, but i was there… heh…

    soddy…

  5. Those jewish students should not go to indonesia… they would go nuts with all the swastikas around there… (had to warn my wife not to use the bag from the tailor that made my suit for me… its covered in such… )… a lot of indonesians may even have it on their cars in the US… but its meaning is different…

    A broken cross is not always a swastica

  6. Lizzy:

    Yes, the poop swastika is suspect on several levels. But now we can assume it was real, at least.

  7. The “poop swastika” is reminiscent of “Christ in urine”, and probably has the same significance to the same class of people. Whereas the motive of drowning Christ in a vat of urine was unmistakeable, the defacing a swastika symbol is ambiguous evidence of anti-Nazi, or anti-Greek, or perhaps anti-Indian prejudice.

  8. Apparently most Jewish parents choose not to fill their children’s heads with memes of perpetual victimhood and oppression.

  9. I don’t think there necessarily has to be any historical awareness or logical consistency to the use of a poop swastika, since the swastika itself seems to have become an all-purpose symbol of hate among white supremacist types.

  10. I checked out the impeachment and removal provisions of the MSA student constitution. Dishonesty is one grounds for impeachment.

    Just allege he was dishonest about his KKK allegation and N word shout out. His credibility is then the issue. Twenty percent need to sign a petition. That’s about 7k. Then a vote in the Senate.

    Call him on the carpet.
    Try his credibility.

  11. Why the confusing mixed message of poop swastika? Because the probable hoaxster needed a quickie symbol to represent White Hate, and a poop Confederate flag would’ve taken forever to draw.

  12. “And here I thought Jews were supposed to be so emotional”

    If that is a stereotype, it is the first time I heard it.

    One can be expected in justice and charity to tolerate and understand many things. But the emotionalism of others is not one of them. LOL

  13. DNW:

    My goodness–that’s really the first time you’ve heard of it?

    Ever see the Woody Allen movie “Annie Hall,” with the contrasting dinner tables between his family home and Annie’s?

  14. OlderandWheezier:

    Victimhood is a debilitating disease caused by mal-nurturing. It lays waste to individuals, families, communities, and nations.

  15. neo-neocon Says:

    November 12th, 2015 at 2:55 pm

    DNW:

    My goodness—that’s really the first time you’ve heard of it?”

    Yeah. And I saw Annie Hall too. I think. Or maybe it was the one with Lloyd Nolan as the old father.

    Now, Italians, I know, were reputed to be emotionally lively. And by their own account according to some of my childhood Italian (if 2nd and 3rd generation) neighbors.

    I remember that the mother and daughters next door used to shout back and forth in their house and you could hear it in our yard.

    “Basta!”

    In that section of the block, counting houses with kids, it was 4 3rd generation but noticeably Irish families, and 4 very visibly Italian families, and us. Somehow we wound up in the middle of that cluster.

    A kid never had it so good. The whole neighborhood was a welcoming open door. 30 and 40 years later the now well grown kids were still talking about how great the neighbors all had been.

    I wouldn’t want to live in a row house, or one of those little city lot houses you see from the freeway in Chicago. But though I know I would not like the confinement now, an 1100 sq ft house on a 55 foot wide lot on a tree lined suburban street, was not the worst way to spend the first ten years of one’s life.

    ‘Course lots of family and friends make all the difference too, eh?

    Here, have a look at the general area Too bad it’s not a sunny view.

  16. Hey Neo,

    I didn’t realize that particular street which was nearby was such a crap one.

    You need to go north and then west or east. LOL But too far east and you wind up in the lake.

    So much for the accuracy of idyllic reminiscences about childhood.

  17. I remain skeptical of the veracity of the caca swastika story. No hazmat report? The youngsters are never without their cell, but no photo from the student suffering microaggression? No police photos taken from multiple angles? All police reports are neutral, free of political pressure? A janitor told to lie to keep his/her/its job in order to support the pc agenda is unbelievable?

  18. I’m not into all this institutionalized grievance-mongering, but wouldn’t this be considered the black kids “appropriating” the Jewish kids’ culture? The absurdity of this folding back onto itself with competing aggrieved groups more interested in shouting who has the best case for victimhood is, well–sad. Pathetic. And really un-American in every way possible.

  19. Step back and look at the big picture. Why WOULD they assume that this was anti-Semitic, and NOT anti-black?

    1) They had a suspect in mind immediately.
    2) That suspect was known to be anti-jewish
    3) That suspect had been in altercations with Jewish students.

    This suspect is most likely an Arab Muslim.

  20. “Wouldn’t the natural target be Jews?”

    What? That makes no sense. I suppose the Russians could argue that the swastika is an anti-Russian symbol … after all, the Nazis killed a lot more Russians than anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>