Out with the old, in with the new
People are starting to be evicted from their rental homes/apartments in order to make way for the influx of “refugees” from the Middle East to Europe:
A woman in Germany is being evicted from her home of 23 years to make way for asylum-seekers, in the second such case to emerge.
Gabrielle Keller has been given until the end of the year to leave her flat in the small southern town of Eschbach, near the border with France.
The flat belongs to the local municipality, which says it is needed to house refugees.
Ms. Keller is 56 years old, and she pays rent; she is not a ward of the government.
The mayor commented thusly:
Mario Schlafke, the mayor of Eschbach, says the town had no choice but to ask Ms Keller to leave.
“The council hasn’t taken a frivolous decision,” he told Welt newspaper. “The alternative would have been to set up beds in the gym.”
No; we couldn’t have that, could we?
The city says it has offered to help her find other accommodations, but Keller has denied this and retained a lawyer.
An extreme example of why immigration policy (and its lawful enforcement) tops my list of national concerns.
Well, this type of action shouldn’t interfere at all with cross-cultural integration. This should be interesting.
And as I posted in one of the threads during the summer of flagrant disregard for our immigration laws, my aunt told me the following from Florida:
A “group” home, currently licensed for 16 beds, has gone before the Pasco county commission to double the bed capacity to 32. Using bunk beds… they currently are being paid 1.5 million dollars for the 16 “children” and want to double capacity to get a 3 million grant from feds for kids here, ILLEGALLY!!!
This would never, ever happen in the US. If she has paid the rent and the lease has not set to expire, then she has a property right to that apartment.
Why don’t the Germans buy some FEMA trailers from us? We also have portable housing in ND that is now empty thanks our friends the Saudis.
Politicians here & in Europe now make it their goal & objective to fulfill the immigrant Bill of Rights. House them, feed them, educate them,
cater to their religious needs, & of course *discretionary income* since they need cash to spend with all the free time they have on their hands. Meanwhile we all know actual Americans (eg seniors, single working people & working families ) who have a hard time paying bills getting food on the table or finding extra cash for
discretionary expenses, What is wrong with THIS picture???
Cornhead the immigrant Bill Of Rights probably precludes *their* living in temporary structures.
BUT the displaced German citizen is *free* to
live there !
You can read bout that kind of thing when the soviets took over and forced kulaks to take in people… in one of the books i recommended endlessly, the maid of the house was nice enough to let the ownrs stay in her room, since they were then homeless.
after all, nothing you have belongs to you, not even what you earn.
if you pay attention to what they say, they say this, and that your priveleged with having anything.
i wonder if she was a feminist
and i wonder if she voted leftist cause of it.
want to bet?
Hey Look
i can see putins footprint on obamas ass from here!!!
ya know… when your population is dying out, for some reason the politicians abandon you and decide to ingratiate themselves to the new residents who have babies, and will live and replace the old ones who took up that ideological man hating dont have babies abortion groups ideas..
Germany has been very forward in implementing the same ideology that ha below birth in the UK, USA, GErmany, Sweden, and all those states whose leaders would rather let the new people in than explain to the women that their idea of a future neutered their future and exterminated the people who would have been born and thus would be a power to be catered to.
[and the old to socialists are disposable, as they take more than they give to their economics]
Germany passes Japan to have world’s lowest birth rate – study
islamics have babies…
so they are the people to replace people who self exterminate as a way to equity…
EVERY western country that took up feminism has been doing this because they cant ask women to become “breeders” as the feminists call it. and cant tell people that the outcome of feminism is slow death by self extermination.
[edited for length by n-n]
Artfldgr:
It’s an old story the world over, in tyrannies and in wartime (or both) especially.
The Third Amendment forbids the practice for soldiers in peacetime.
The Nazis certainly confiscated plenty of homes, too. As I said, an old story.
The German government is importing a new and more pliable (they wish!) population.
Our own government is doing the same thing here. And your property “rights” aren’t going to mean a thing when the rubber hits the road. Your rights are subject to selective enforcement and recognition by the powers that be.
It’s not an old story to Keller.
And you know, her tax money is helping to foot the rent on the place she’s getting bounced out of.
I think Europe’s fertility rate averaged out is about 1.38. It takes what, 2.11 ? The U.S. is well below that, too.
“All property is theft.” –Communists everywhere.
Spot the fallacy? i.e., you can only steal from rightful owners.
Cornhead, you’re right, but the Powers That Be don’t respect our property rights, or the Law. They moved into despot mode some time ago, and have been taking outlying members of the herd in the night….
About 58% of German are renters.
You can see the face of one of the evicting official here.
Always good to put a face on things ….
Enjoy your MultiCulti German!
The story behind the picture at the above link.
Prepare!
What the gov sugar daddy gives, it can also take away. And will.
Reminds me of a something from Brecht (a figure I don’t admire, but this from him was rather good, prophetic even);
This seems to be what our social engineering governments are doing.
If all property is theft, why do Westerners allow Ayers to live in his mansion?
Why?
Dislocation is only the most obvious consequence of excessive and unmeasured immigration. There are far more insidious effects and motives that reduce the viability of a population.
This is a reminder of why government should not own or control housing. It just makes it easier to oppress citizens.