Hillary’s troubles continue
There’s a lot of turmoil roiling around Hillary Clinton today, so much that she actually deigned to answer a few questions for a change.
One piece of news was a ruling re the release of her emails by the State Department:
Hillary Clinton and the State Department on Tuesday insisted they are not slow-walking the public release of her emails during her time as secretary of state, while a federal judge ordered up a plan for a rolling release of the hotly anticipated documents.
“Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do,” Clinton said…
Shades of Whitewater, OJ seeking his wife’s killer, and Obama being the last to find out about everything bad that he’s done.
She says she has no control over the emails because they’re not hers any more. Of course, she made sure of that by destroying the ones she felt like destroying and turning over to State the ones she felt like sharing:
Clinton has said she turned over all messages that were arguably work-related, but decided to delete a roughly equal number of messages that her lawyers determined were personal or private in nature.
What a charade.
But does the public care? Stalwart Democrats will support her no matter what. The question is whether there are enough distrustful swing voters (especially women) to make a difference.
Despite this wench claiming that she had only email address—–VOILA—–yet another email address surfaces. One that she used for corresponding with Sidney Blumenthal.
Another day, another LIE.
S/B “only one email address”
There is also a page six article about how people couldn’t stand working with Chelsea.
“What difference, at this point, does it make?”. Too easy?
Shes done…. the left dont want her… and she is so compromized that anyone else can knock her off her seat… from bengazi, to BJs in the oval office, to what difference does it make, to private emails on private hacked servers, and on and on…
“does the public care? Stalwart Democrats will support her no matter what.”
Half do, half don’t. Stalwart Democrats support their shared ideological ‘truth’, not Hillary herself. In their heart of hearts, they know she is a corrupt woman of little accomplishment. If she’s the nominee, they’ll support her because she supports the ideological ‘truths’, that they support. It’s a ‘religious’ thing.
“The question is whether there are enough distrustful swing voters (especially women) to make a difference.”
And upon that question may hang the votes needed to give her the nomination. Ideology is driving the democrat party but the ultimate pragmatic factor is, can the nominee be elected? To maintain the momentum of the Left’s agenda, another democrat must follow Obama. It is because they are so close to the political tipping point, that the 2016 election is as important to them, as it is to us.
most dont care as other things are more important and on some peoples minds, while other things are on others minds… hillary this far back from election is a waste of time and a total distraction… but dont let that stop us!!!
way before hillary will matter, kerry will sign our rights to internet and all that to the UN… he is basically claiming that the net is not working and it takes their doing things to make it better… (their having an odd definition of better. we think better is the comparative of well, they think better is that its under their control. so when they say better, the rubes think they mean the first, and not the second)
there is all kinds of stuff that is on the verge of going hot, and we are ignoring it for the most part until it DOES go hot… but by then, the facts will be buried and you wont be able to read about things in the detail because the left will focus on it then erase what is inconvenient.
amazing things…
and tons of it double plus ungood…
My mother, the ultimate low-information Democrat voter, recently said she’d never vote for Hillary because she’s a liar and can’t be trusted. So some of it is getting through.
Hillary is not going to inspire voters key to the dems. Thus, the dem power brokers, especially the boychild, will sandbag her desire to be ‘inevitable’.
“The question is whether there are enough distrustful swing voters (especially women) to make a difference.”
Judging by her lack of concern about the need to actually talk to the voters, the press, or anyone else in the United States, I’d say they’ve already figured out the answer to your question.
The plan is to sit back and take the beating, while the press talks to the Republican candidates, who continue to provide missteps and future ammunition for the Clinton hit squad
If I were one of the future losers, I would answer every question they asked me: “hmmm. What does Hilary think about that?”. At least It might get a trend started and make the losing more enjoyable. 😊
Popcorn…
While Hillary does have a lot of negatives, this country has already proven that they will vote for a pig in a poke. She gives them a chance to be all historic again. She does lack the cool factor, though.
Anyway, some of think we have already passed the political tipping point. If not in Nov 2008, then definitely in Nov 2012.
55,000 pages of emails
“Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do,” Clinton said to reporters in a rare instance of fielding press questions on the campaign trail.
The State Department on Monday night proposed a deadline of January 2016 to complete its review and publicly release the whole set of documents….[how convenient]…. but a federal judge on Tuesday rejected such a plan. [uh oh]
U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras on Tuesday said in a written order State must propose a new schedule by next Tuesday that involves disclosing the records batch-by-batch on a regular basis and updating the court every 60 days on the releases.
It does not seem possible for HC to have received the negative leftist attention she has unless she is out.
If correct, that means there is an alternative plan in store for us. That is not good. Maybe the bizarre behavior of the Clintons recently is explained by their understanding of this.
Follow the money, yes, but also follow the propaganda.
I commented last week on Instapundit and will repeat it here; I don’t think Hillary is actually running or expects to win if she does. But being a declared candidate and potential president keeps the graft, corruption, and extortion dollars flowing.
Here, a Hiltlery true believer:ouch!
Hillary Clinton is not familiar. She is revolutionary. Not radical, but revolutionary: the distinction is crucial. She is one of Americas greatest modern creations. Her decades in our public life must not blind us to the fact that she represents new realities and possibilities. Indeed, those same decades have conferred upon her what newness usually lacks: judgment, and even wisdom…
http://time.com/3823194/hillary-clinton-2015-time-100/
kaba – – intriguing insight.
Then, who is the Democrat candidate, I wonder? What is the Hillary alternative?
Neo: Does the public care?
Me: No.
From a comment at Althouse: HRC could chainsaw a basket of kittens at halftime of the Super Bowl and still get 47% of the vote.
Me: Agreed.
Per a story in WaPo, she has the Obama Coalition. That’s what her call for full citizenship for illegal aliens is all a outs. Minorities, women, LGBT, Greens and maybe unions equals 47%.
Right now they are working on getting non-citizens to vote.
A outs = about
Tonawanda,
Good question. Of course O’Malley, Warren, and Biden have been mentioned. I wouldn’t hazard a guess which has the resources available to actually make a run. Nightmare scenario: Hillary withdraws very late in the process and there is a Draft Mama Obama movement quietly running behind the scene. That would hold all of Obama’s existing consistencies.
Kaba, I couldn’t disagree more. I think she is definitely running and I think she definitely expects to win.
She probably will.
America could have chosen Sarah Palin, whose mail account was cracked and no hint of corruption or government information was there for them to release.
But no, the wise Americans now want to talk about HRC. It’s some kind of spiral to the netherworld. People who choose corrupt leaders over non corrupt ones, don’t really deserve the latter any more.
Elizabeth Warren, Indian giver of Massachusetts with her fake tribal affiliations, is a legitimate successor of Hussein though. I mean, just look at the parallels.
Ymarsakar: an interesting comparison! The woman who was vetted to within an inch of her life, with NO corruption found, vs. the woman who has lied, destroyed evidence, allowed her employees to be brutally killed, and sold influence at the highest levels.
One of these women was hounded off the national stage. The other refuses to answer questions… and reporters charitably refuse to ask them.
It seems like a problem of priorities.
Hillary is going to lose, and lose big. Not Reagan 525 electoral votes big, but big. She will lose a couple of states that Democrats are *sure* they have in the bag: WI and PA.
That’s 30 votes right there.
They will lose all of the swing states except maybe NM.
Final total: GOP = 321, Dems = 217.
The difference won’t be because legions voted for the GOP (though maybe Latinos may), but because Hillary’s turnout will be horrible.
P.S. the coming recession won’t help her numbers either.
“Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do,” Clinton said…”
I can see why she won’t talk to the press. That ball is just hanging over the plate, begging to get hit out of the park.
I don’t even think what passes for reporters in this country could resist. Sure, some could. A lot could, considering what passes for a reporter in this country includes George Stephanopoulous.
But not all of them could.
Cornhead wrote:
“From a comment at Althouse: HRC could chainsaw a basket of kittens at halftime of the Super Bowl and still get 47% of the vote.”
If she bayoneted them instead her fan club would say that proves she has what it takes to be Commander in Chief.
[if you flip clintons policies 180 degrees will they vote for her… ]
Hillary Clinton Supporters Actually Don’t Support Hillary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0SnIgOwZ3A
OK – what happened to my comment, typed in twice?
Neo, I’m contacting you here because our IT people now block all links, including e-mail, from this site. Their reason is that links from here go to http://x.vindicosuite.com which they claim is loaded with viruses and adware. I miss using the links and I thought I’d let you know about this.
The Obama administration is considering a range of options to respond to Russia’s ongoing violation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty. Part of the response could involve deploying new U.S. weapons to Eastern Europe.
[russia never keeps a treaty… EVER. they are used to limit opposition behavior while gaining advantage until the opposition realized they been played, then they respond, and russia has an excuse to make claims as to their actions!! obamas response may lead to a large scale war, which i guess russia thinks is ok, since they know how everything we have works, including M1A1 battle tank electronics, which obama just facilitated their having… (FOIA has just released records showing that obama been supplying AQ and ISIS as his method of regime change)]
Russia continues to violate the 1987 agreement, which banned both the U.S. and Russia from developing or deploying nuclear weapons with a range between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. The treaty was the first nuclear arms agreement to reduce the number of nuclear weapons
[so we reduced, and they had over 28 years to build up and ignore things!!!! and obama is trying a second hillary clinton non reset button reset]
“The first solution to this problem is for Russia to stop doing this. That’s the most important thing,” said Winnefeld. “That’s the way out of this problem. If it doesn’t look like that is going to happen, there are options.”
[Options? what options? you idiots in state not only ignored this for 28+ years, but opened up your borders, let tons of operatives in, gave them technology and even funded their buyilding more missiles under the lie they were taking them apart, and helped rebuild and expand yamentau mountain and many other places… yamentau is a bomb shelter covering 400 sq miles under a quartz mountain]
Some of the more aggressive options would include deploying more land-based military hardware to NATO allies for missile defense near the Russian border, to counter the new Russian cruise capability. Expanded targeted sanctions and added patrols near Russian space are less aggressive options on the table.
[well that wont work at all… all that will do is give them more time to gear up and prepare.. they will be taking more of the ukraine later, if they invade the baltics, it will either be world war, or we will lose NATO and all allies for not having world war with nukes and new toys… progressives and fabians WANT war, as it allows them to redefine society under other auspices]
to read the rest of the article is to laugh… and cry..
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
sorry to put this here, but if i waited for it to appear, it would not appear… nuclear war and fights between russia and america are to be ignored, just as spies, disinformation, and other campaigns are to be pretended not to exist…
There is a heck of a lot more, but like black on white crime, and other things, the press wont report it, or deal with it much.
go back to sleep… nothing has happened
these are not the droids your looking for…
Phil U.:
I have no idea what they’re talking about.
I can see where the links here go. It’s not to that site. Nor does anyone else say that’s happening here. If your employer’s IT people say links from here go there, as far as I can see it’s a problem with your employer’s system, not this one.
I don’t think a majority of the voting public give a damn.
I think the inflection point occurred in the Clinton administration. That the public could re-elect someone under those circumstances indicates that the moral base wasn’t there anymore.
The march through the institutions has been very successful for the left.
As for how long Rodham can remain silent, well, how about until Jan 20, 2017 when she is sworn in? After all if the media don’t object, then who cares.
It seems like a problem of priorities.
I would call it a demonstration of their priorities, unless they can prove to me that they do have a problem with their priorities.
People can remember when they fell for the “two interview Sarah Palin” MSM propaganda here, when they started talking to me about why I don’t consider her non Presidential material after the 2 interviews came out. Unlike other people, Leftist propaganda has to get through several firewalls to get to me, and that’s before my internal defenses kick in. The weaklings think they are strong, but unless they can hit themselves with amnesia, they know very well how many pratfalls the MSewerM made them take.
Neo has automatic wordpress spam filters. Which means if you use words used in bot advertising, you might be filtered out, but it seems the post went through.
Also if you use more than 2 links, you begin to be logged in the system as a potential threat.
Neo, don’t suspect Phil of being a bot and posting advertising links here?
Thanks neo, I passed your reply to our systems guy.
OK then – one more time.
No, probably you will not get an answer out of Hillary. Not a new answer, anyway. Unless instruments of torture are used, and there is a lot of screaming.