Obama is Christian-victim-blind
Referring to the horrific act of “15 Muslim asylum-seekers [who] reportedly threw 12 Christian asylum-seekers overboard as they made their way from Libya to Sicily this week,” Kirsten Powers writes:
As [Italian PM] Renzi was questioned about the incident, Obama was mute on the killings. He failed to interject any sense of outrage or even tepid concern for the targeting of Christians for their faith. If a Christian mob on a ship bound for Italy threw 12 Muslims to their death for praying to Allah, does anyone think the president would have been so disinterested? When three North Carolina Muslims were gunned down by a virulent atheist, Obama rightly spoke out against the horrifying killings. But he just can’t seem to find any passion for the mass persecution of Middle Eastern Christians or the eradication of Christianity from its birthplace.
We’ve seen this sequence before. A Muslim or several Muslim murder members of a different religion—sometimes Christians, sometimes Jews—in an act that is explicitly and unequivocally motivated by religious intolerance, and Obama is silent on the matter of the motivation as well as the religion of the targets. And yet if he feels a crime motivated by hatred against a Muslim or black person has occurred, he does not hesitate to describe it as such.
By creed, the death of infidels at the hands of Muslims can’t be a crime.
His imam indoctrinated him well.
He is not piping up because to do so would cripple his bona fides with all true Muslims — especially those all-critical despots that send thrills up his leg.
Christian-victim-blind = Muslim Dominant Favored
and on another note, ny times reports certainty while quoting the uncertainty… too funny… (yet gruberians are too stupid to comprhend)
like Dems siding with the south, they will side with the violent group they think will win…. its ingratiating dont you know…
There is a sincerely supported prejudice in human rights circles that favors displaced and oppressed non-Christians, unless it serves to displace and oppress Americans and Europeans.
It is getting clearer and clearer where Obama’s deepest sympathies lie. Maybe the lapdog press will figure it out someday.
Or not.
Artfldgr:
Someone described it as choosing the “winning side”. It’s difficult for most Christians to appreciate, but absent religious convictions, this is factually a “fit” strategy in an amoral society that favor opportunistic behaviors. Survival of the fittest is technically a minority principle.
To be fair to Obama there are certain African-American deaths that he doesn’t go out of his way to protest:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-chicago-shooting-violence-20150417-story.html#page=1
As for those who are scratching their heads wondering why Obama hasn’t made an issue of Iran’s oft-declared “non-negotiable” policy of Israel’s destruction, they should really try to understand that Obama can’t be expected to respond every time a country threatens the destruction of some other random country.
He’s a very busy man.
Blind? I think not.
Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by malice.
This is not a head scratcher. Obama sympathizes and identifies with Islam and despises the West and all its works, including Christianity and Judaism. Once you accept this simple truth, then all of Obama’s actions make perfectly good sense.
What else would you expect from a ‘closet Muslim’* and a racist?
* I’m less and less inclined to assume that Obama is merely a sympathizer to and an apologist for Islam. I think it more and more likely that he’s a Muslim pretending to be a Christian.
I also suspect that Obama sees little conflict between Islam and Marxist/socialism as atheism is NOT inherent to Marxist theory.
“To be fair to Obama there are certain African-American deaths that he doesn’t go out of his way to protest” Barry Meislin
Look a bit deeper. Obama never comments upon black-on-black crime. That would be contrary to the narrative.
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. Barak Obama, September 12, 2012, in a speech to the UN. Admit it Neo, he’s a Muslim.
Kirsten Powers writes:
As [Italian PM] Renzi was questioned about the incident, Obama was mute on the killings. …
That really is quite strange considering Obama’s exquisitely tuned empathy for oppressed minorities–though there can be little doubt that the 12 Christians were just tragic victims of “random” shipboard violence. (Or perhaps the ship could be construed as a “workplace”…)
I’m less and less inclined to assume that Obama is merely a sympathizer to and an apologist for Islam. I think it more and more likely that he’s a Muslim pretending to be a Christian.
Ah yes, unequivocally. If O is not a muslim in the mosque he is most certainly in his obsidian heart.
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
– Barack ‘The Barakah’* Hussein Obama (Audacity of Hope)
As to the dubiousness of his Christianity I offer this — he was baptized by Rev. Wright in Wright’s Church Of Latter Day Hates.
*Barakah – in Islam, the beneficent force from God that flows through the physical and spiritual spheres.
Except for the ‘God’ part, that is pretty much how liberal acolytes worship him.
As for those who are scratching their heads wondering why Obama hasn’t made an issue of Iran’s oft-declared “non-negotiable” policy of Israel’s destruction, they should really try to understand that Obama can’t be expected to respond every time a country threatens the destruction of some other random country.
He’s a very busy man.
Yeah, I mean, all those rounds of golf won’t just play themselves, you know!
Maybe if the Christians of the Middle East all pretended to be gay, then Obama might start noticing them.
I await the Tony-winning Broadway play.
Obama blindness is caused by his bigotry – it is that simple. He doesn’t see them as victims because they aren’t fully human in his mind. period.
Obama’s attitude toward Christians is, quite simply, Loathsome & Despicable. The man is a true Midget.
Ayatollah Soetoro is as racist as Adolf.
His difficulty is that he hates the majority… so he has to dissemble.
Which is good, since it comes as mother’s milk to his lips.
Paul in Boston…
The REAL ‘tells’ are the ayatollah’s extreme performances when overseas to stay entirely inside the norms of Islam.
Pretty much at the top of the list: shunning the Golden Temple at Amritsar. This particular edifice is an affront to ALL Islam. It’s dedicated to an Islamic defeat.
Barry shunned it like it was garlic… to the total amazement of the Indian government.
This temple doesn’t even come up on the Jewish or Christian radar. It’s not taboo for Hindus, either.
It’s a certified riot maker for Muslims though.
When ayatollah Soetoro found out that the Indian government was slotting him up to THE major Sikh temple he freaked out — and had it nixxed.
BTW, a huge percentage of ‘Indian’ immigrants to the US are, in fact, Sikhs — not Hindus. They are wildly over represented. You’ll find them all over the motel trade.
Further immigration of Sikhs should be stopped — as like all Indians — their ideas about society are ENTIRELY caste oriented — and they’ve slotted themselves as landlords-only.
This crowd needs financial assistance like Muslims need bullets… total redundancies in both cases.
BTW, I love the way that the Internet white washes events.
You can read plenty about this famous temple without discovering that it was motivated as an offering/ celebration of a decisive victory over the Islamic hordes.
The body-count around Amritsar is rather like Magdeburg in the Thirty-Years War: epic in the extreme.
[ For trivia buffs, Magdeburg is the single most destroyed city in all of Europe — having been totally flattened by some accounts over TWENTY times. It would’ve been flattened by atomic bursts if the balloon had gone up in the Cold War: it was THE prompt mobilization base for the Soviet 20th Guards Army… the Red Army spearhead.]
{ And the 20th was the army that stopped the panzers before Moscow in 1941.}