Andrew C. McCarthy explains the “ISIS isn’t Muslim” claim further
Here.
I tackled the question in this post, but McCarthy has a lot more to say.
The New Neo
A blog about political change, among other things
Here.
I tackled the question in this post, but McCarthy has a lot more to say.
Andrew McCarthy’s answer to your previous post about how people wouldn’t believe Jan Karski and his stories about the Nazis is that the situation is different now. He believes that many people on the left do understand exactly who Muslims are and have decided to collaborate with them in destroying the West.
Jan Karski’s message is not lost however. The left have listened and understand how easy it is for people to slip into denial. Knowing the tendency for people to go into denial they have deliberately set the stage for denial through media and cultural manipulation and through outright lies to push as many people into denial long enough for them to prepare the chains to permanently enslave the common people.
There is no space for moderation in islam – sharia for true believers. A moderate muslim imo would be a muslim willing to kill the monsters residing within their muslim community. I will not be holding my breath for that to happen.
One of the operational advantages of Muslim names is that they are mumbles of murder to Western ears.
One would have to speak Arabic to make logical sense of them.
This is compounded by the ubiquitous usage of nome de guerre. Some of the more active jihadis are ‘men of names.’
The Muslim naming system tosses in a location identifier at the very end.
al Maliki
al Baghdadi
Khomeini
Preceding that, expect to find some patronymic string. One never knows just how far back a Muslim may take it. Because Muslims keep using the same ‘lucky’ or prestigious names, it may take quite a string before a jihadi comes up with a unique ‘handle.’
What it means for Western law enforcement is that observers can only provide jibberish during interviews.
The cell phone must come to the rescue.
It must become habit for anyone to take a snapshot of anyone giving out a Muslim name. For any such name is practically meaningless to law enforcement officers.
Our national leadership never had any business letting mass immigration come from the ummah.
The avowed aim of Muslims is to conquer the world and milk it for Muslims.
That Bush didn’t stop Muslim immigration promptly with 9-11 will become a rising stain upon his presidency.
Yes, blert, no muslims should be allowed to enter any Western nation. Let them eat sand and the death they promote. The camel they rode in on. I have zero tolerance. My give a damn is busted.
McCarthy certainly lays out chapter and verse. Like blert says, the names are gibberish to most of us. It allows them to use many names and aliases to float through our system.
They have infiltrated our government because the progs think they need to have Muslims in the government to understand the Muslim point of view. They’re so very open minded and sensitive. On this issue they are being subjected to taqiyya. “The word “Taqiyya” literally means: “Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one’s beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies. In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralizing any criticism of Islam or Muslims.”
From: http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Taqiyya-Islamic-Principle-Lying-for-Allah.htm
The progs want to be so tolerant because they are convinced any problems with Islam are mostly our fault. You can only believe that if you accept that this country has a dark imperial past. Which is exactly what they believe.
The preaching of jihad in the mosques is a violation of U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, § 2385. That refers to advocating the violent overthrow of the government. It should be used to prosecute and jail the imams who are preaching it.
We can try to kill the millions of trigger pullers, but it is more efficient to go after the inciters, recruiters, and money men. Without them, the trigger pullers don’t have inspiration, invitations, and means to join the fight.
We eventually have to recognize that Islam is not compatible with western values and laws. Either outlaw it or insist that all “moderate Muslims” who want to continue to live in the U.S. take a pledge to live in mutual tolerance with all people on penalty of death if the pledge is violated. And then enforce it.
Islam can be moderate after excising the imperial (i.e. left-wing) component of the ideology.
parker . . .
Great words and deep thoughts! You speak for me.
How much bs will we all have to put up with before the obvious moves will be clear?
Having read a lot about the March of Folly throughout history, I know that we are doomed to suffer the actions of fools. However, I am not in despair because I know that some of those fools (not all, of course) will get their just deserts.
” n.n Says:
September 16th, 2014 at 11:34 pm
Islam can be moderate after excising the imperial (i.e. left-wing) component of the ideology. ”
= = = = = = = =
Sorry, but no. The Execrable Book will still say the same damned things, and some subset of True Believers will decide to model their actions on Mohammed’s “perfect example”.
So, in short, Islam may -*temporarily*- seem to “moderate” itself, but Allah’s Perfect Plan for Mankind (every human being in complete submission to Allah) is unchanging. Muslims will inevitably return to the True Islam of their forefathers.
Islam cannot — CAN NOT — change.
[ See this link for complete discussion: ]
http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/terrifying-brilliance-of-islamic.html
In a world in which Christianity is demonized and suppressed, one should expect Islam to spread, especially among working class and middle class men.
It warrants many things that are attractive. Its theological demands are few (five in all) and easy to understand. It reinforces patriarchy and the status of men. It authorizes violence against unbelievers. Although it enforces an austere life style, compared to the complex and unintelligible demands of Progressivism or the Catholic Church, it is quite liberating for its followers.
A very honest and unflinching article re: the truth about Islam, and the need to take the Islamic State seriously, by James Schall SJ, an author and former professor of political science at Georgetown:
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/its_time_to_take_the_islamic_state_seriously
bob sykes,
Good point. ISIS’s recruiting pitch presents its social movement as a solution for modern cultural alienation.
Bob your citing points about why Islam appeals to
inmates, patriarchy, male status etc.
I read where prison Islam recruiters actually tell the
most violent criminals that they were * wrongly
incarcerated*! If they raped women *so what*
as men they are entitled to *take* women, only a
flawed country & justice system would jail a man for that !