The New York Times…
…is one sick puppy.
They should change their motto from “All the news that’s fit to print” to “All the gossip that could hurt the Republicans, and none of the news that could hurt the Democrats.”
I guess it’s a little long, though.
All Hail Leftist Dogma -new line
That is their Good and we know what their Evil is.
This is who they are. This is what they are. They have not changed. The world will merely change to become like them. That is what it means to change the world.
Let’s name names: Andy Rosenthal and Pinch Sulzberger are nothing but punks. They must have some serious oedipal issues.
And Alan Dershowitz, famed defender of civil rights including due process, basically tries Christie without the evidence.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Christie-bridge-lies-Wildstein/2014/01/31/id/550280
How about: “All the News That Fits Our Slant”
Christie “knew.”
Sort of like RatherGate’s fake, but, accurate memo.
The MSM does this because so few call them out on it.
As I believe I heard Krauthammer comment, so what if Christie “knew about the lane closures.” That applies to quite a few people in New Jersey, as those lane closures were immediately apparent, right?
But the implication behind these “Christie Knew!” stories is that he knew in advance, as part of some kind of conspiracy.
Shameless.
Once the MSM drops the payload, they don’t need to do anything more. The damage is already done.
Bad mouthing Muslims can get you killed. Bad mouthing conservatives, even lying, has no cost.
“All the News That’s Fit to Slant”.
I’ve been using that one since the 80s.
The NYT is good for Crosswords. The entirety of the rest of it is slanderous propaganda of some sort. The entirety. At its best it is worse than Pravda ever was, far more en enemy of AMerica, and 100 times as damaging as an ICBM.
The reason why war trumps propaganda WMDs is because of what Frank mentioned above.
Debate is for people who think they can keep their Republic.
From the Washington Examiner:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/this-just-in-new-york-times-reporters-embarrassed-by-the-papers-editorial-pages/article/2543452
This is too delicious not to quote:
Reporters in The New York Times newsroom deeply resent the paper’s editorial page, and the dissent has “reached the boiling point,” the New York Observer reports Tuesday.
It’s not an ideological dispute, the Observer says, but rather the sense that the paper’s editorials and columns are boring, ineffectual, poorly written and poorly read. The story was based on interviews with more than two dozen current and former Times staffers, mostly on condition of anonymity out of fear of editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal.
Rosenthal was described as a petty tyrant, and lazy in his supervision of an opinion staff that is widely seen outside the newsroom as the voice of the Left-wing establishment.
But many saved their most pointed criticism for foreign affairs columnist Thomas Friedman, noting that his writing in recent years has been widely parodied and ridiculed.
“As for the columnists, Friedman is the worst. He hasn’t had an original thought in 20 years; he’s an embarrassment. He’s perceived as an idiot who has been wrong about every major issue for 20 years, from favoring the invasion of Iraq to the notion that green energy is the most important topic in the world even as the financial markets were imploding,” said a former Times writer described as having “gone on to great success elsewhere.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/baldwin/2014/02/03/why-johnny-cant-do-percentages/
Great article on the math–and science–challenged work at the New York Times.
They were well trained as attack dogs, injected with rabies, that’s the NYTimes.
As has been said, Obama is a jealous god and will force his followers to choose between their own credibility and his agenda.
We know which way the NY Times has gone.
For those that are depressed by this, some historical perspective:
Pravda means “truth” in Russian. But by the end (and probably well before the end!), nobody in Russia expected to get the truth out of Pravda. They knew it was the propaganda arm of the state, and was not to be trusted.
For all its fancy theorizing, leftism cannot compete with reality and people’s own eyes. All they end up doing is destroying their own credibility.