Somebody tell Mayor Bloomberg…
…that the large-soda ban isn’t even likely to work.
So saith the economists who did the study he cited to justify the ban.
The New Neo
A blog about political change, among other things
…that the large-soda ban isn’t even likely to work.
So saith the economists who did the study he cited to justify the ban.
everyone defaults..
ie. they assume that what is being presented is being presented at some level of honesty. when it isnt.. its just self serving and lies are ok… so it really doesnt matter if the study validates or not, or the point is valid or not, or even if the idea works… THOSE are all things good people want valid to make good decisions, but under social engineering, those are the inputs to poison to control behavior or gain outcome of some sort.
ie. they have to sell you on the points of the agenda, regardless of validity, sanity, outcome, etc..
This has been explained more than once by me, but its like watching those toys which run into a wall, back up and run into a wall. they cant deviate from their programming, so they HAVE to answer. (even if later they say that they dont think that way – they do, they just deny it after the fact without analyzing the whole process of why bother)
what your trying to discuss as valid is the argument for public consumption. IE. whatever can be said, or done or manipulated to achieve the goal… again, ie need not be principled, valid, truthful, or anything OTHER than it is a facet of the goal
what your missing is the argument themselves, which is what the goal is and what facets are needed, and the real reason why.
I put up the example using social engineering and child birth between russia 1918, when population was self exterminated wiht their progresive ideas… so how did the state, after saying one thing, turn it back to the opposite? easy… it just changed the selling points.
so when it was lots of births and so on, kolantai and others came up with ideas of how schools would be formed, the destruction of family (Which opposes the state using the children in a meat grinder), end of church, free abortion on demand, free love, no fault divorce, etc.
by the time WWII was over, they had realized that their ideas were disasterous. they resulted in the depupulation of their state.. (to the point that today they cant build up. they are dying out as they went below replacement)
so at that time, they switched course trying to stop it… while at the same time, delivering the same ideas to the US under feminism and liberation, so that the liberated would exterminate themselves accepting the same ideas without defense as the soviets did.
except that they will not be allowed to reverse the course…
meanwhile… we as a society have no idea of this game. other than the experienced, the rest, by definition, are Dodos…
too stupid to learn a new way, so they keep running their head at the wall, and over and over.
they will never know how critical it is to stop doing that and stop being a nothing… whose thoughts, ideas, and actions amount to nothing
its a WASTE OF TIME in the new system they are using to discuss the crap they make up to convince you. its crap. it was nevr intended to be valid. its just the sociopathic idea of try any excuse, watch the answers, and if people respond well, keep pressing and using that.
so its just a search for arguments tha tmake it acceptable to murder babies, devalue the scapgoats and denude them of property and rigthts (genocide), breed and train the others, and so on.
for some reason you all have such self esteem that you cant understand your position. your cattle. chattel… no one cares what you think, your thoughts don’t matter (Especially if not leading to some outcome) and these ideas are what a abattoir would tell sheep and cows to get them to the slaughter.
by the time you adjust to this, its too late
ie. the system changes, you become incompetent, confused… then you get it.,
[edited for length by n-n]
artfldgr: I think you are reading too little into my post. Although in this case I was atempting some subtle sarcasm (perhaps too subtle?), so it’s not really your fault.
But I am well aware that for many on the left (the leaders, primarily) the agenda is the thing, not the truth or falsehood of their assertions. “The ends justifies the means” is certainly a well-known precept which they follow.
For others (particularly the readers, the public, the followers, not the leaders), truth of the assertions is an issue, but they don’t want to question it too deeply.
Where Bloomberg falls on this scale I don’t really know.
(hands over ears)
LA LA LA LA I CAN’T HEAAAR YOOOOOUUUUU!!!!
What it must be like to walk past strangers on the street and be certain you know better how they should live their lives than they do.
How do progressives miss the obnoxious arrogance in what they’ve become?
The progressives miss the arrogance because they are too busy patting each other on the back. They are willing “to suffer the slings and arrows” from the little people, bitterly clinging to their guns, bibles, and large Cokes, because they know what’s best for them in the long run.
O-4
ORIGINAL ORDER
IN CITY COUNCIL
June 18, 2012
MAYOR DAVIS
WHEREAS: High intake of soda and other sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity and diabetes; and
WHEREAS:
New York City has a plan to limit the serving size of soda and other sugar-sweetened beverages sold in restaurants; now therefore be it
ORDERED:
That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to refer the matter of a ban on soda and sugar-sweetened beverages in restaurants to the Cambridge Public Health Department for a recommendation.
The word Soviet means Council or Committee