The Kraushaar complaints: what I’d like to know is…
…what’s “a spokeswoman in the office of the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration“?
Because that’s what Karen Kraushaar does these days. Seems a rather odd job description.
But remind me never to send Kraushaar any of those silly email forwards:
[Kraushaar’s] complaint [at the job she held after her NRA position] also cited as objectionable an email that a manager had circulated comparing computers to women and men, a former supervisor said. The complaint claimed that the email, based on humor widely circulated on the Internet, was sexually explicit, according to the supervisor, who did not have a copy of the email. The joke circulated online lists reasons men and women were like computers, including that men were like computers because “in order to get their attention, you have to turn them on.” Women were like computers because “even your smallest mistakes are stored in long-term memory for later retrieval.”
Can’t imagine why Kraushaar would take offense at that.
And we still don’t know what Kraushaar is alleging Cain did or said to her that she found so offensive.
Is it possible that no corporate executive who worked in the 1990’s and was a friendly guy can run for office. They must all have a trail of gold diggers and cranky complainers behind them.
Another thing strange about this registered republican is her only donation on the FEC database shows that in 2009 she donated 250.00 to the DNC.
A she-male, a witch, and an invisible woman walk into a bar and ask if they can raze a little Cain.
Would the joke be better if “bar” were “pressroom” or “abc headquarters?”
Maybe “women studies” should be “rumble studies.”
Mabe God didn’t take Adam’s rib and make Eve out of it. Maybe He took Adam’s fang.
the issue wasnt that she was offended… the issue was that she could be offended by literally anything, and all she needs is the will to push the process… even a talk show host had to appear in court to defend himself against some wackaloon claiming he was affecting her…
there are tons of examples.
but one defining difference
the men who do those are not taken seriously, and feminism has normalized taking the people we used to ignore more seriously than any others.
this is because under such lawyers they had changed the court sustem to make the law asymetrical in practice despite wording…
heck, there is a organization of women judges whose sole advocacy is to release women after conviction (its easier and less public)…
the problem is fixing itself, but not in our lifetimes… they are slowly exterminating themselves… taking most of their main mates with them
from the census cover page showing it..
to the records on such
A record 14.6% of all new marriages in the United States in 2008 were between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another.
see… fixing itself…
the feminists are dying out as they are unmarriable, and are writing tons of articles and books on how to get a man, there are no more good men, and so on.
but note, chinese women are marrying their mates in droves… having children too…
to the point that the feminist ladies have articles on that too. saying us men want submissive wives… and that us born rapists want to beat them… (i can show links)
you can also work out the demographics too…
(if you include IQ… well then it gets REALLY interesting…)
White-Hispanic (41%)
White-Asian (15%)
White-Black (11%)
Other Combinations (33%)
(Other combinations consists of pairings between different minority groups, multi-racial people, and American Indians)
certainly looks like some people are avoiding the toxic ideology, eh?
the ONE thing that would destroy feminism was to show that those who adopt the ideology have a super high risk of self genocide of their family… and so on..
Some 22% of all black male newlyweds in 2008 married outside their race, compared with just 9% of black female newlyweds
Soooo… the african american women are really complaining… (to the point of race hate to the white women stealing their men. its in the stats!)… but the white women are losing their men to the asians and spanish, two groups that feminism is under represented in!!!!
you marry an asian, or a spanish person, and your going to be invited into a culture that still wants family, still has women who like to be women, and so on and so forth…
of course the fembots dont like these facts so you get slammed for them. but they are there to look up in wiki and other places, and with a bit of thought, you can read them.
Some 40% of Asian female newlyweds married outside their race in 2008, compared with just 20% of Asian male newlyweds
seems that from what i can see… the Asian women are scooping up the good mates who want families and that kind of life while the Caucasian women are having group sex… hooking up, getting hpv inoculations, and so on…
Rates of intermarriages among newlyweds in the U.S. more than doubled between 1980 (6.7%) and 2008 (14.6%). Rates more than doubled among whites and nearly tripled among blacks. But for both Hispanics and Asians, rates were nearly identical in 2008 and 1980.
see… the most ideological groups in the progressives eyes, are dying out and diluting…
and note that these relationships have more babies over the under replacement rate of the more edumacated…
now before everyone yells racist and such…
Most Americans say they approve of racial or ethnic intermarriage — not just in the abstract, but in their own families. More than six-in-ten say it would be fine with them if a family member told them they were going to marry someone from any of three major race/ethnic groups other than their own.
so no one is against it..
what we are against is social engineering that accelerates it due to making some people into the kind of people we are talking about in this thread…
what example are these women all almost one race, or close… teaching?
well, any smart guy knows that women copy other women… so if your lady has a feminist line and sympathizes, you can tell where your going to end up with her… no? ie, to sympathize you have to accept the bs as valid… and if you do, then your more likly to act on such…
so this change is not IMPEDED by racism…
but its certainly accelerated by ideology
and the key is, with these people and what little is left of the family history and skills, are on the outs…
if they are below replacement
AND 25% are marrying outside each year and more is the trend.
genocide is the end result…
feminism DID liberate women from having babies… the dead and gone, dont have them
there were 354,000 White female/Black male and 196,000 Black female/White male marriages in March 2009
divorce rates are lowest in matched race pairs
so Obama is a huge demographic in the black community… (disempowers the african woman who has few steady mates and high rates of birth… thanks ebt!)
The “marriage squeeze” refers to the perception that the most “eligible” and “desirable” African American men are marrying non-African American women at a higher rate, leaving African American women who wish to marry African American men with fewer partnering options. According to Newsweek, 43% of African American women between the ages of 30 and 34 have never been married. This figure is similar to the percentage of unmarried women of other races except white females
and here is the reason
note its not feminism and hatred of family
its not welfare… its not anything that it is.
its the victims fault…
Several explanations of this phenomenon have been advanced by sociologists. It may be in part due to the still lingering effects of social ostracism, to which Caucasian American men who married African American women were heavily subjected in the past.[citation needed] It may also be the result of a desire among African American women to marry African American men due to concepts such as racial loyalty. In recent times, however, many African American women have expressed a desire and openness to marriage with non-African American men.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_squeeze
note that court and pay days like th is is just one more way that single women can use the courts to earn what a mate would have provided had they had one… (and were not disloyal to such out of ideological commitment)
keep thinking that the demographics havent changed and not thinking complexly about these things…
and you wont notice how things are changing and how the democrats who DO know the demographics and ARE Thinking… are courting the future (while ostracizing and denying anything to that which is dying out! to back the dying out is a losing game, no?)
power for powers sake is different than power as a tool…
every successful single mother teaches her son that he is not needed… why would he marry the same and find himself with no place?
in 20 years again, it will be huge numbers and the outcome will be easy to see… and there will be nothing that can be done… as the forces have deemed the west to be destroyed, and in every way, from belief, family, race, culture, and such. its being erased, while the victims deny it rather than act to protect what they are losing and we are all losing.
with them goes freedom, as no other group created freedom of the people, or even has it.
no better way to remove the other than to have them not be born..
put it all together… and add it up, rather than look in isolation and not see the numbers out of the whole.
MSNBC pundit Demands Herman Cain Register as Sex Offender
This guy is lying. … Why should Herman Cain, if he’s even accused of one of these and found guilty, that man should have to register as a sexual offender.” Jimmy Williams
What did these women find so offensive about Mr. Cain?
Let me guess:
He’s a black Republican running for President, who is therefore perfectly situated to take on President Obama… and give him a serious run for his money. He also gets us dangerously close to forever killing the Republicans-are-racists nonsense.
I’m guessing some people might find that pretty offensive.
(Hey, we got accused of being racists for opposing Obama in 2008… as though there could be no other possible reason. Shoe’s on the other foot, baby. If you find Herman Cain offensive, you demonstrate to us that it has nothing to do with racism. I promise to pay careful attention, which is more than our accusers did in 2008.)
Abortion Mill Offers Sunday Special
bring the coupon with you and get 50 dollar discount on abortions… only on sundays..
In fact, some activists and legal experts in Sweden want to change the law there so that the burden of proof is on the accused; the alleged rapist would have to show that he got consent, instead of the victim having to prove that she didn’t give it. Jessica Valenti
Linda Bourque argued for presumptive guilt in rape accusations in her 1989 book Defining Rape. Susan Caringella, a sociology professor at Western Michigan University, called for the dismantling of what she calls overzealous protections for men in her 2008 book Addressing Rape Reform in Law and Practice.
and
Another example of systematic violence perpetrated by a violent ideology is the popularization of the foolish and hateful idea that every adult man is a potential pedophile. It’s social convention, and not legitimate research which brands men the offending demographic in the sexual abuse of children [7]. Because of the perpetuation of this falsehood, men must curb their normal, healthy, natural inclination to enjoy interaction with children.
ergo… almost no men teach the lower grades in the west.. harrasment and all that
…what’s “a spokeswoman in the office of the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration“?
An excellent reason for a massive reduction in the size of government is the correct answer.
She is someone who speaks to Congress is my guess.
A colleague of mine used to say hire a white male so that if he doesn’t work out we can fire him.
“A colleague of mine used to say hire a white male so that if he doesn’t work out we can fire him.”
Perhaps it is time for conservative white males to occupy their respective state capitals to prove a point; namely, if conservative white males stop contributing to the economy the entire country comes to a standstill in 10 days.
Make that conservative males of any race or creed.
There are a lot of made-up jobs like this in the federal government. Just check out: usajobs.gov. Our brand new $6million upgraded website that barely works. 😉
Good evidence that a reformation, even if small, has been happening:
http://www.tnr.com/article/the-vital-center/97177/obama-reelection-strategy
There are not a few who declare Cain’s response to the defamation and murder of his reputation disqualifies him from becoming President.
No. Not yet at least. If you back a fighter, is the fight over merely because he took a hit. Well, yes if the hit was a knock out.
But I’m think Cain took a knock punch. I think there’s a lot of people who think it’s okay to give as good as you get, which includes throwing a smear back at the smearors. Not that you don’t want that kind of behavior to be initiated by your side, but, every now and then, when something savage and absolutely diabolical is set against your person, it’s good to see that person react with a little anger, a little outrage, and even, a little over the top behavior.
read the comments… 🙂
David Gregory Jumps the Shark
David Gregory, NBC News: “Well there is no, you know, Grand Wizard in the party right now who can really force the issue.”
[many thanks to occam for noticing that the stats start AFTER the most violent years, revisioning them out… (keep reading and you might learn the history of the word league, is the same as peoples which came after it)]
oops… forgot link
http://moonbattery.com/?p=4360#comment-47497
Ann Coulter has a column which convinces me that Axelrod and the Obama administration are behind this smear campaign. Their role may not be provable legally but we are still entitled to our opinions and can act accordingly. Why not investigate Axelrod. This jerk should be dragged through the mud.
I just figured out the really salient difference between Clarence Thomas thing and the Cain thing and how it pertains to outcomes…
in the case of Clarence, it was a bunch of political flunkies voting and so on…
in the case of Cain, its people, so the two are not comparable. if the people can elect X, they certainly change their mind, not give a hoot about what the political flunky worries about, and in anonymity, put him in office
and as i noticed so does the wind blow…
Cain is on top this morning..
because the people are choosing what to regard and disregard, which is so unlike the political class in Thomas case
the left may find that the idea of a teflon coating they construct through great effort can exist without any effort when the people have a will of their own, and choose what they value and believe – and not listen to what they are told to believe…
Famous Speeches: To Kill a Mockingbird
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8TgqenWW0I
To Kill A MoCain bird…
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/to-kill.jpg