Gaddafi captured, Gaddafi killed?
We’re getting conflicting reports, but something seems to be going on in Libya with Gaddafi. He appears to have been either captured or killed:
National Transitional Council official Abdel Majid Mlegta told Reuters earlier that Gaddafi was captured and wounded in both legs at dawn on Thursday as he tried to flee in a convoy which NATO warplanes attacked.
“He was also hit in his head,” the official said. “There was a lot of firing against his group and he died.”
There was no independent confirmation of his remarks.
It’s impossible to tell what is true and what is not, but I suppose it will emerge pretty soon. In the meantime, these details seem like they may have been somewhat embroidered:
The former Libyan dictator was reportedly found cowering in a hole in the ground at the centre of Sirte…Rebels said he had been armed with a golden pistol when he was found…
A golden pistol? What could that be about?
Mr. Assad’s mind must be concentrated today.
EuroNews just has shown reportage from Sirte. Quite graphic, but this looks very like Qaddafi.
Could be real, maybe not..
Unless that Austrian dude was really a woman, the only remains of him is not the remains of him…
ODESSA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ODESSA
Hilfsverein der Deutschen Juden
www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%206371.pdf
so the idea of him not being dead, or bin laden not being dead… is not so far fetched… there is no way to know either way given the players and people in our state and dissimulation. you either pick one or accept you don’t know and cant know
historically speaking, the leaders tend not to be able to disappear. ie, they cant keep their mouths shut and dont want to live humbled lives less than what they had… so they tend to get caught if they flee..
i cant NOT recall any time in modern history where a leader of a state fled in secret and had a dead man take his place.
the story of it is common enough from fairy tale to others, but the reality of it is unknown.
HOWEVER, the ONE EXCEPTION to the above is the soviets… (of course)
From lenin safely holing himself up in germany until all the dirty work was done in russia… to russian spies and operatives disappearing and ending up there with a position in state so that they cant be prosecuted or sent back for trial of any sourt…
there are LOTS of such escapes and near things for heads of organizations and so on… but heads of countries? not so much…
Netaji maybe… (Subhas Chandra Bose)
however to get more you have to go to
Death of Subhas Chandra Bose to get a mention: it has also been alleged at various times that the Indian government and political leadership was aware that Bose may have been alive, and according to one theory, in captivity in Soviet Union,[3][4] but chose to ignore or actively collaborate to suppress this information after Independence.
the times uk newspapers links to the new information, leads to quaddaffy… go figure
Secret files shed light on death of Subhas Chandra Bose, rebel who wanted Nazi support to free India – Times Online
.
and
Subhas Chandra Bose: The Afterlife of India’s Fascist Leader
was he?
In his inquiry report, completed in 2006, Justice Mukherjee was categoric. He concluded: ‘Netaji Bose is dead [a safe bet as he would have been 109]. He did not die in the plane crash as alleged and the ashes in the Japanese temple in Tokyo [maintained by the Indian government since 1945] are not of Netaji.’
Bose’s admirers believe the Congress Party will never allow the truth about their hero to be known because it is the party of the Nehru family and Jawaharlal Nehru (1889-1964) and Subhas Bose were bitter rivals. Some go further and believe that Prime Minister Nehru conspired with the Russians to prevent Bose returning to India after Independence because he felt threatened by him; hence the cover-up.
you can read more here: http://www.historytoday.com/hugh-purcell/subhas-chandra-bose-afterlife-india%E2%80%99s-fascist-leader
more in next post so its not too long….
Follow this link for a moderately graphic photo of what looks like Gaddafi:
http://twitpic.com/73245p
the term used would be exfiltration…
the question being whether or not he was exfiltrated and another takes his place can not be answered in a state which does not transparently say…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_action_%28military%29#Exfiltration
I’m feeling a little icky about the media celebration of the US-sponsored mob lynching of the recognized leader of a country.
Hey, Saddam got a trial. Osama was an outlaw. Mubarak is sitting in jail. Heck, even Manuel Noriega is still rotting in prison. Even the nazi’s got trials followed by a righteous hanging….
Ceaucescu and his bitch were lynched, but not under US imprimature…
This is really kinda ugly. I don’t feel “OK’ about it. The media celebration and the victory dance in the rose garden is making me feel really icky.
This isn’t justice. This isn’t how a Superpower does things.
The Iran fiasco of 30 years ago cured me permanently of any fondness for “democracy” in that colon of hell known as the Middle East.
So what now for Libya? Will there be ongoing civil wars with different factions fighting for control? Or will the people push for order and move toward becoming a good citizen of the world? Will it become the next Iran and push terrorist activities around the world? Will it become the next haven for Muslim terrorists?
Do you think Obama or anyone in his administration has a plan?
Firstly, I would like to point out that this following line in my comment maybe incorrect, but I have heard that it is true: 1) if the [civil war-type conflict in Lybia], is a war- Mr. Obama sent the U.S. military into it without the needed authorization from Congress to go to war.
2) if the [U.S. military’s actions in Libya’s civil war-type conflict] are a “military action”, then Mr. Obama put the U.S. military into the conflict, without [the needed authorization from the Congress to go to a military conflict.]
I am not happy or glad that Mr. Gaddafi has been killed, but I do feel that he was a greedy man who supported huge terrorist acts and huge acts of crime-therefore, I am relieved that he is not running a country, or supporting criminals anymore.
I believe that Mr. Obama put us, the U.S., into the war in Libya, without getting legal permission to do so, from the U.S. Congress. One of my hopes are that he does not put us into any other wars without permission. Another hope of mine, is that he doesn’t go into a war, without Congress’ backing, that is too big for him to handle…I hope that he does not make giant military mistakes that former heads of state have done…such as sending an army to Russia during the winter.
Never heard of the mistake of attacking Russia in the winter? Then please look up Napoleon Bonaparte, or other tyrants, such as a European tyrant/chancellor, who did a winter-attack on Russia, in the 20th century.
I am hearing that NATO ground forces got to him first, shot him in the legs then turned him over to locals. The locals then finished the job. “We came, we saw , we killed” by forces not authorized to be in a war that didn’t exist.
In for a penny, in for a pounding. Libya’s going to be governed by a bunch of inbred thugs with their palms wanting to be greased. Or else. Just another Extortion Vampire State.
Supposedly among Daffy’s last words were “what did I ever do to you?” Interesting choice of words if so. Not even “I bet you can’t hit me from this distance” could be more provocative.
As for what comes next, the Islamists will probably organize the fastest, get outside support and arms, claim the initial elections were rigged or the NTC is a Zionist front, have a civil war with outside assistance from other Jihadis followed by another election in which they will win 99% of the vote. Meanwhile the humanitarian Arab League and freedom loving Nato states stand in line to sign oil leases at more favorable rates than would be possible with a truly democratic government.
Does this prediction make me a conspiracy nut or realist?