That last set they played was actually a game of basketball
Longest match in tennis history (by far) finally ends with a win by John Isner, 6-4, 3-6, 6-7, 7-6 , 70-68.
Longest match in tennis history (by far) finally ends with a win by John Isner, 6-4, 3-6, 6-7, 7-6 , 70-68.
One word: Amazing!
When it goes on, in my book they both won. And no one can say they weren’t evenly matched, can they?
OMG… and neither man fell over unconscious. That’s amazing. Those men are titans now.
And, as Andy Roddick quipped during day two,”Doesn’t either one of these guys have to pee?”
Two of the previous sets also went to tiebreakers, so, yeah, they were very evenly matched, and played a lot of tennis before it was over. It’ll be interesting to see if Isner has anything left in the tank for his next match.
I’m not much of a tennis fan, but I like it when history is made. Wow.
It sort of reminds me of a Stanley Cup game a number of years ago (I’m not much of a hockey fan either) that went through several overtime periods. I was watching it at a bar with some friends, and in Pennsylvania last call is at 2:00 AM. The bartender chased out everyone but us regulars, and I finally gave up and left around 3:00. The game was still going on.
The bartender chased out everyone but us regulars, and I finally gave up and left around 3:00. The game was still going on.
The longest baseball game on record (that went into extra innings, that is) was a 25-inning marathon in 1984 between Chicago and Milwaukee (AL). It ran 8 hours and 6 minutes, and fans were joking about having to watch the game in shifts.
From Wikipedia:
If you’re interested, you can look up all of those boxscores at http://www.retrosheet.org/
A 26-inning game played in 3 hours 50 minutes is literally unimaginable today. Heck, 9 inning playoff and World Series games routinely take that long, and more.
I can think of a number of reasons why modern baseball games take longer to play than those of the early 20th century, but two reasons stand out:
1. Games were not on television or radio, so there were no commercials between innings. The teams changed sides immediately, since there was no reason not to.
2. There were no lights in the ballparks, and games were often called on account of darkness. Everyone involved had an incentive to keep the game moving so as to reach a conclusion before then.
rickl, in addition to the reasons you cited, here is another reason. Current baseball players take much more time between pitches than in the past. The batter gets out of the box more often. The pitcher delays more.
I remember when Denny McLain used to pitch for the Tigers (last 30-game winner, in 1968; we won’t discuss his subsequent “issues”, all of which have been well-documented in the court transcripts). Anyway, when Denny pitched, you could count on the game ending in around two hours, sometimes less. If you were the batter, you had to be ready to go when he was on the mound. If you stepped out on him too much, you’d get one under the chin.
waltj:
My family was living in Cincinnati in 1968, and we went to Michigan for a vacation that year. I don’t remember exactly where we went or what we did, but we did make a stop in Detroit and my dad and I took in a game at Tiger Stadium, the only time I was ever there. I didn’t see one of McLain’s 31 wins, but I did see one of his 6 losses. This one.