For those who trust the UN to fix global warming…
…dream on.
Even if the science of AGW were true (which does not at the moment appear to be the case), the idea that the UN could do anything positive about it is laughable. After all, their track record is so exemplary—is it not?—as is the track record of governmental management of economies around the world.
[ADDENDUM: Copenhagen, AGW, and Western collective suicide.]
[ADDENDUM II: Could it be that the western industrialized nations don’t want to commit suicide after all? A leaked document has angered the third world representatives at Copenhagen.]
As to addendum II:
Quelle surprise! But the suicide watch hasn’t been lifted. Economic and demographic Russian roulette is still suicide — just gamier.
i explained a while ago the odd idea of materialism that advises strategy for socialists to maneuver people en masse.
that is, we are material. we operate on principals. so like classical materialism (which is not about buying lots of stuff), they operate on principals of how to move people. people are more easily moved when they are teleological, emotions based and distracted. so i use the analogy, do you care what the cab driver is thinking when he takes you to where you want to be? of course not. and if your target was to put the cab driver someplace, would he realize HE was being taken for a ride when you ask him to take you there?
i am hoping this formulation sparks where others didnt.
so the idea about things arent quite what you andmost think from a leadership without leadership perspective. a image vs reality game.
protesters dont actually change things to what they want. protesters provide the excuse for a politician to take an actoin they want, and then not be culpable for the outcome. their hands were tied. the tea parties might have made that clear, but i am afraid they didnt. the problem with the tea parties is that no politicans wanted what the tea party was facilitating, and nancy pelosi didnt want people to realize that this is how it works.
well, here your seeing the parallel concept of spending literally 30 years setting up the gathering. layering it… and now they are going to bait and switch the situation, as the people in the countries when they get back, wont understand if they dont sign.
what we are also watching is a huge game in the very end game.
we know the main players because this is too big not to have them. the russians are playing games at the end, they now have options. the eu leaders that wrote up things and were clever enough to trick europe, are now lynching their target the small countries (how else does a stagnated europe stay above water if these other small countries dont keep their people down now that everyone knows that capitalism works).
these politicians are just realizeing the corner they have been put in. dont sign, they will end up losing back home. do sign, and they will stay in office, but over misery… and will have a sword over their heads too.
china, as always tends to play the quiet game where we forget about thinking about her.
and no one has any idea what UK, USA, are actually going to do (which is a problem for the USA, since how can the people who serve know what the people who employ them dont?)
World bank computers were broken into, remember? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,435681,00.html
The World Bank Group’s computer network – one of the largest repositories of sensitive data about the economies of every nation – has been raided repeatedly by outsiders for more than a year, FOX News has learned.
guess who?
In plainspeak: “They had access to everything,” says the source. “They had the keys to every room at the bank. And we can’t say whether they still do or don’t until we fully and openly address what’s happening here.”
so behind the scenes there is one big “great game” playing… too many interests… too much money to not have them there… too many ways to game things depending on how he cards will land.
meanwhile, the science behind it was UNFALSIFIABLE… that is, could not be disproved, or proved. that is a GREAT place ot be if you want to use something to your advantage. unlike feminisms leaning on a made up idea (tabula rasa, evolution of intelligence stagnated, etc – though you may know them more by fancy names rather than what they amount to), now finding more and more genetic and medical proof that counter it and so has them expending great energy in making sure the real info does not move to the public sphere and so goes their power base to dictate to their followers.
since the 30s they have refined this process to try to insure that their work is unfalsefiable… in that way they are free to define things by their games, and not have some inconvenient truth keep popping up. (the fact taht the terms and focus have changed shows that they are still refining it and so they havent removed all pop up inconvenient truths).
so now we are on the eve of some pretty big things. does any one really think that the people who put the poison in the chalice with the palace would drink from anything but the flagon with the dragon?
[the satellites resist everything that they helped visit on us that they know was visited and what poison it results in]
remember the treaty doesnt have to be ratified. in fact, thats the point. if its submitted to congress to ratify it, it will be rejected. but if its signed and then never submitted, we have to uphold it till a decision is made. that is, we cant destroy the treaty by not following it while waiting for congress to ratify it.
interesting eh?
the devil is in the details, and just cause you dont see moves dont mean they arent there.
“For UN planners, and politicians jetting into Copenhagen to further pretend they can better organize our lives based on this confetti of calculations is beyond inane.”
Oh yes, the UN has done such a good job of:
!. running the IPCC and keeping it honest.
2. running the oil for food program in Iraq
3. helping the Israelis and Palestineans find a road to peace
4. preventing genocide in Rwanda, Burundi, the Sudan, the Congo, etc.
5. combatting world hunger
6. protecting human rights
7. improving healthcare in 3rd World countries
8. combatting malaria in the 3rd World
9. stopping the spread of AIDS in Africa
10. preventing nuclear proliferation
Oh, but they have the very best of intentions.
There’s quite a slam on the UN IPCC here:
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/flashback-to-bali-un-tactics-to-silence-dissent/
It’s a first hand account of five ways they stifled dissent at the Bali conference.
1. Filter out skeptical bookings
2. Ban journalists who might ask hard questions
3. Offer them a room they can’t use
4. Allow them to “protest” then retract permission
5. Offer opponents a lecture theater on the second last day — “forget” to put it in the official program
Dr. William Gray (today):
“The recent ‘ClimateGate’ revelations coming out of the UK University of East Anglia are but the tip of a giant iceberg of a well organized international climate warming conspiracy that has been gathering momentum for the last 25 years. This conspiracy would become much more manifest if all the e-mails of the publically funded climate research groups of the US and of foreign governments were ever made public.”
(Atmospheric Scientist and Hurricane forecasting specialist Dr. William Gray. Gray is the renowned hurricane forecaster and Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University (CSU).):
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/4369/Hurricane-Expert-Rips-Climate-Fears-There-has-been-an-unrelenting-quarter-century-of-onesided-indoctrination
Hell, I don’t trust the UN to fix a parking ticket.
/OK, I stand corrected. They can do that.
Dr. William Gray
No relation. I’m just a schmo.
Anything that impedes the Warmists’ agenda is OK by me… 😉