<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hr Archives - The New Neo</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/tag/hr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/tag/hr/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>House GOP election security guidelines bill</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/</link>
					<comments>https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=131656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The House has come up with a model bill for states to follow in order to secure their elections. It&#8217;s a good effort, I think. But it&#8217;s the sort of thing that only will be passed in states with GOP <span class="excerpt-dots">&#8230;</span> <a class="more-link" href="https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/"><span class="more-msg">Continue reading &#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/">House GOP election security guidelines bill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thenewneo.com">The New Neo</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House <a href="https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/12/house-republicans-roll-out-legislative-blueprint-for-states-to-secure-their-elections/">has come up with</a> a model bill for states to follow in order to secure their elections.  It&#8217;s a good effort, I think. But it&#8217;s the sort of thing that only will be passed in states with GOP legislatures, GOP governors, and conservative judges who won&#8217;t overturn it when it&#8217;s challenged in the courts by the left.  </p>
<p>Here are some excerpts from the bill:</p>
<blockquote><p>Titled, “<a href="https://cha.house.gov/uniform-state-ace-act">The Uniform State American Confidence in Elections (ACE) Act</a>,” the legislative tool kit provides 13 recommended state laws “to increase voters’ confidence and promote election integrity.” Many of the policies are modeled after the <a href="https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/14/over-70-nonprofits-call-on-congress-to-pass-republicans-election-integrity-bill/">ACE Act</a>, a federal measure containing similar provisions that House Republicans introduced last year. The bill was passed by the Committee on House Administration in July and is awaiting a full House floor vote.</p>
<p>Included in the Uniform State ACE Act are policies long-supported by election integrity activists, including voter ID and proof of residency requirements for individuals voting in person or by mail. Despite Democrats’ claims that ID requirements suppress non-white voters, the vast majority of U.S. voters — including those who are black and Hispanic — support such election safeguards. Several courts have also recently shot down Democrat-backed lawsuits alleging voter-ID laws “suppress” voters.</p>
<p>Another policy suggested is a mandate to regularly remove ineligible voters from state voter rolls. This would include removing any non-citizens on the list. &#8230;</p>
<p>Also included in the Uniform State ACE Act is a recommendation that states prohibit private funding of elections [such as &#8220;Zuckbucks&#8221;].</p></blockquote>
<p>These things should be no-brainers for states to pass.  They are simply obvious basic safeguards. But as I said, only GOP-controlled states will pass them, and the control has to be solid.</p>
<p>You may recall that, the next time the Democrats get control of the federal government, they are planning to pass <a href="https://www.thenewneo.com/2021/06/23/hr1-going-nowhere-for-now-and-all-the-republicans-in-the-senate-voted-to-block-it/">HR1 or its equivalent</a>, a <i>federal</i> uniform voting act that will make it impossible for states to employ these safeguards of voting security.  This is an enormously important part of the Democrats&#8217; platform, one of which many people are unaware. If the Democrats win both houses of Congress and the presidency, many more people will become aware, but it will probably be too late. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/">House GOP election security guidelines bill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thenewneo.com">The New Neo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thenewneo.com/2024/01/19/house-gop-election-security-guidelines-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
