White blue-collar women do not ♥ Obamacare
The results of a recent Kaiser poll are somewhat of a surprise to me. It found that one of the groups most down on Obamacare right now is white blue-collar women, otherwise known as “waitress moms,” who have turned against the law in the last month or so:
…50 percent [of this group] have a “very unfavorable” view of the law””9 points higher than in October. An additional 13 percent view it “somewhat unfavorably.” Indeed, antipathy among blue-collar white women runs even deeper than the most conservative white demographic group, blue-collar white men (59 percent of whom hold an unfavorable view, Kaiser found).
Remarkably, only 16 percent of blue-collar white women have a favorable view of Obamacare. They disapprove of it by a 4-1 ratio. (The poll found 21 percent did not know enough about the ACA to hold an opinion.)
Women are Obama’s natural constituency. But the article reminds me of something I had forgotten: it’s not “women” as a whole:
These voters [white blue-collar women] are by no means a strongly Democratic group: Obama won just 39 percent of them last year.
And the article also reminded me of something else that had slipped my mind, which is that white college-educated woman are not far behind:
40 percent of college-educated white women hold a “very unfavorable” view of the law””10 points higher than a month ago. An additional 10 percent view the law “somewhat unfavorably.” A month ago, those two groups together totaled just 42 percent.
That’s not damning in and of itself, but this is the one slice of the white electorate where Democrats usually perform well. President Obama won 46 percent of the group in 2012, and even that was an underwhelming showing compared with recent Democratic presidential candidates.
Because the white college-educated women I know are so overwhelmingly liberal Obama voters (the total is nearly 100% among them and that goes for their husbands, too; I am acquainted with only one couple where the wife is for Obama and the husband not) I tend to forget that, statistically speaking, such overwhelming support is not the norm. Obama won the female vote, but in particular he won the vote of single women, and single women are disproportionately young (another group he won) and minority (another group he won).
Unfortunately, the Kaiser poll does not break down its results into either marital status, age, or race (although if you look at the data, it did gather those facts and could break down the results that way if it chose to do so). I’d be very interested in learning whether single women and/or minority women have soured on Obamacare as well.
We already know that a great many of the young have turned on Obamacare. My guess is that the website fiasco has been particularly galling to them, as well as a perception that young people are being overcharged to pay for older people. Looking at the more detailed data from the millennial poll, here are some hints about the rest of the demographics, although the question being answered here was not about Obamacare but rather about approval of Obama:
…[Obama’s] approval rating among college students is down 11 percentage points to 39 percent, young male voters slipped 9 percentage points to 41 percent approval and this rating is now statistically tied with young female voters, whose approval of the president dropped 15 points to 40 percent. Young white voters’ approval dropped by 10 points to 28 percent, Hispanics decreased by 18 points (53% approval) — and approval among young Black voters slipped 9 percentage points, but was still strong at 75 percent.
That’s pretty powerful. Remember, though, that Republicans’ approval ratings—already low among this group—have dropped as well. So I’m not at all sure this measures anything more than a general disillusion with government. But as I pointed out yesterday, this could at least theoretically favor conservatives in 2014, if there’s any way to convey more about the fact that small government advocates are not just being meanies, but have a coherent philosophy that they hope will benefit people and the nation as a whole.
This latter idea ties into another finding of the poll on millennials, which is that the number of young people who believe the country “is moving in the right direction” is abysmally small:
Less than one-in-five (14%) young Americans in our poll indicate that the country is headed in the right direction, 49 percent believe its headed in the wrong direction, while 34 percent are not sure.
This drop in optimism was very pronounced among 18- to 29- year old females. The percent responding that the nation is moving in the right direction decreased by 14 percentage points from 2012 to 2013, compared to just 7 percentage points for males over the same time period. The percent of Black Millennials under 30 believing that the country is moving in the direction also dropped significantly from 2012 to 2013. In 2012, 49 percent of Black respondents believed the country was moving in the right direction. Now, less than one-in-four (24%) believe the country is moving in the right direction.
Of course, one must be careful in interpreting such numbers. Many of the respondents might consider that “the right direction” is ever more leftward. Many may be upset with Obamacare because it isn’t single payer. Both surveys would have done well to ask questions that probed these issues, but as far as I can tell they did not.
[NOTE: Notice from the title of this post that I’ve mastered the skill of making a heart in HTML code. I ♥ that.]
[ADDENDUM: The polls are even worse for Obama on the issues.]
Wait till January 1st. Many will not have coverage. Many others will think they are covered but learn otherwise. When we hear stories about people who are damaged as a result, they will be called “anecdotes”.
The Left doesn’t care. The January Firsters will be considered collateral damage in their ongoing culture war.
Stay tuned.
The left likes “the masses” in the abstract, but they have little use for them as individuals. Blue collar women seem to have figured this out.
The reaction of the establishment GOP is probably to be more ‘moderate.’ I think just the opposite. Run on anti-NSA, anti-Obamacare and pro-growth. The voice we need is someone like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz. They’ll appeal to the youth vote.
Millennials already believe (correctly, IMO) that Social Security won’t be around for them when they retire. Now, they’re being asked to further subsidize the generation that screwed them.
I know that smacks of class warfare, but if I were a Republican politician I would totally play up that angle.
Also, bring up the Wall Street bailouts and the ongoing cronyism of the insurance industry.
Just like Alinsky, “make them live up to their own standards.”
I ♥ too
I ® © ¢ £ ° too. (might never have found that page had you not piqued my curiosity neo 🙂 )
“Wait till January 1st. Many will not have coverage. Many others will think they are covered but learn otherwise. When we hear stories about people who are damaged as a result, they will be called “anecdotes”.”
At first, sure. But when (not if) tens upon tens of millions lose their coverage, have to pay much higher premiums, lose their doctor and can’t get a new doctor or hospital nearby ‘in-network’, then George Will’s “all hell will break lose” will happen and the left will experience the cost of not caring.
Is there anything better than when unrepentant bad guys shoot themselves in the a**? You have to ♥ that!
Geoffrey Britain:
See my more recent post right above this one.
Women are not going to be happy changing doctors who’ve been family physicians going back — forever.
ONLY the youngest gals, who have yet to give birth, look past the interruption of the doctor-patient relationship.
0-care — in almost all cases — cuts the territories down to county size. So those, like me, living just over the county line from a hospital now have to endure going to a facility thirty-minutes away — instead of seven-minutes.
Let’s face it folks, Barry has thrown a spanner into the works. Most physicians (80%) are STILL outside 0-care. The pricing DEMANDED by the Wan is a staggering cram-down against their wages.
Wage and price controls have ever been a disaster. Just ask Nixon … or Venezuela.
Forced (medical) labor — shades of a Death Kamp ‘hospital.’
The reality is that uncontracted physicians are NOT going to be paid.
Further, professional ethics makes most talent unwilling to sign on the line that is dotted.
I wouldn’t, that’s for sure.
Who in good conscience perform professionally — when the big decisions are being made by rote — by the Forbin Project back in Washington DC — by the same crew that coded Healthcare.gov?
This is as insane as any of the worst dictatorships of the 20th Century. Now, with metadata and the all powerful NSA, the Kamp system is not needed to keep the proles in line.
Barry already has the MSM entirely cowed.
Now, if he can only get the seas to recede.
Paging King Canute….
I was dismayed over Thanksgiving that my niece (25) and her boyfriend are still complacently sparkly about Comrade Zero. Fully expecting agreement, they declared that it was terrible that someone’s relative had accused them of “being stupid” for voting for Obama. How Rude!
They both have good processing speed, but a huge GIGO problem [Garbage In, Garbage Out]. Besides, they think Comrade Zero is just dreamy. And those old Republican fossils, well, if you blow the cobwebs off of them you’d find ancient types who just want to hang on to the Victorian era, for cripes’ sakes.
Besides, we All Know that it’s the insurance companies (booo! hisss!) who have made a mess of Obamacare. And the mean old Republicans, who haven’t supported it and have, like, Blocked everything! Duh!
That’s all they’ll get out of even the most horrific crash of Obamacare. They’ll never pull their heads out of the … sand … long enough to see, much less acknowledge, the disaster. They’re ineducable.
Pingback:Will Young Voters Abandon Democrats? Don’t Hold Your Breath | pundit from another planet
Many of these young people are starting to get it. Or at least understand that they are going to get it – good and hard.
Matt_SE – early Gen X here, and even back then, we didn’t expect Social Security to be there for us. I’m almost shocked it’s still around.