<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Lindsay Clancy possibilities	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 15:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In various jurisdictions, not necessarily Massachusetts, choices of charges include; Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity&quot;, and &quot;Guilty But Insane&quot;.  Clearly, in neither case is it being said the accused didn&#039;t commit the offense.  
The question is the sentence, if any.  Clearly, if &quot;not guilty&quot;, you don&#039;t get prison time as if guilty, but some serious attention from the mental health system is warranted, but how is that enforced?  Does a panel of psychologists say....he&#039;s okay now, and the perp gets out after a short--relative to the jail time if he&#039;d been &quot;guilty&quot;--period and is....on the street?
If guilty but insane, does the perp go from mental institution to prison for the remainder of his sentence?  Yes.  No.  Sometimes.
From the outside, both look kind of .....not good enough for the offense.  So, I submit, popular opinion would like to see &quot;not insane&quot; so that the full sentence deserved is imposed and served.  Which conflicts with &quot;you gotta be nuts to want to do that stuff.&quot;
Tough, tough case in the court of public opinion.  A psychotic break as Neo describes it means a powerful, possibly irresistible urge to harm your kids.  After which it goes away.  It was in your head, waiting for the kids to show up, and now it&#039;s gone.  Gone....  So she could get a job at a daycare center?  Would her fan club compalin if she were turned down--presuming mobility? EEOC?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In various jurisdictions, not necessarily Massachusetts, choices of charges include; Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity&#8221;, and &#8220;Guilty But Insane&#8221;.  Clearly, in neither case is it being said the accused didn&#8217;t commit the offense.<br />
The question is the sentence, if any.  Clearly, if &#8220;not guilty&#8221;, you don&#8217;t get prison time as if guilty, but some serious attention from the mental health system is warranted, but how is that enforced?  Does a panel of psychologists say&#8230;.he&#8217;s okay now, and the perp gets out after a short&#8211;relative to the jail time if he&#8217;d been &#8220;guilty&#8221;&#8211;period and is&#8230;.on the street?<br />
If guilty but insane, does the perp go from mental institution to prison for the remainder of his sentence?  Yes.  No.  Sometimes.<br />
From the outside, both look kind of &#8230;..not good enough for the offense.  So, I submit, popular opinion would like to see &#8220;not insane&#8221; so that the full sentence deserved is imposed and served.  Which conflicts with &#8220;you gotta be nuts to want to do that stuff.&#8221;<br />
Tough, tough case in the court of public opinion.  A psychotic break as Neo describes it means a powerful, possibly irresistible urge to harm your kids.  After which it goes away.  It was in your head, waiting for the kids to show up, and now it&#8217;s gone.  Gone&#8230;.  So she could get a job at a daycare center?  Would her fan club compalin if she were turned down&#8211;presuming mobility? EEOC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rufus T. Firefly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus T. Firefly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[neo @ 6:49am,

Thank you for that information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neo @ 6:49am,</p>
<p>Thank you for that information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rufus T. Firefly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus T. Firefly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kate,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I don’t know what I would have done on this jury. I’ve read about the evidence, but i wasn’t in court.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

My attitude also. As the lone, hold out juror on a murder trial* I have personal experience that the evidence and arguments presented to jurors, along with the judge&#039;s instructions, can be quite different from what the general public perceives reading media accounts.

*I eventually changed my vote reviewing and discussing the evidence with the other jurors. It was a complex case and not nearly as cut and dry as it seemed to the casual observer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate,</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I don’t know what I would have done on this jury. I’ve read about the evidence, but i wasn’t in court.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>My attitude also. As the lone, hold out juror on a murder trial* I have personal experience that the evidence and arguments presented to jurors, along with the judge&#8217;s instructions, can be quite different from what the general public perceives reading media accounts.</p>
<p>*I eventually changed my vote reviewing and discussing the evidence with the other jurors. It was a complex case and not nearly as cut and dry as it seemed to the casual observer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rufus T. Firefly		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus T. Firefly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[huxley,

I am sorry for your mother and sister, and for you and your surviving sister. Being raised by a parent in such a state must have been very difficult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huxley,</p>
<p>I am sorry for your mother and sister, and for you and your surviving sister. Being raised by a parent in such a state must have been very difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wendy K. Laubach:

Post-partum depression was not what Clancy is claiming to have suffered. It is post-partum psychosis, plus exacerbated manic-depression. That&#039;s a different entity. And yet many people keep saying postpartum depression.  

Postpartum psychosis is rare and postpartum depression is common. But with postpartum psychosis, the person is often at risk for harming or killing her children even through she has shown nothing but love and caring for them in the past.  Postpartum psychosis does not lead to bank robbery or random crimes, when it leads to crimes. It leads to child harming or child murder, usually under the sway of a delusion of some sort, and often coupled with suicide attempts or completed suicide.

See &lt;a href=&quot;https://jaapl.org/content/40/3/318&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The postpartum period is the time of highest risk in a woman&#039;s lifetime for the development of a mental illness. Although the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) defines the postpartum period as the immediate, relatively short time following delivery, in research studies this period has been defined as ranging from a few days to 12 months.

Postpartum-onset psychological problems generally fall into one of three categories: so-called baby blues, postpartum depression, and postpartum psychosis. Baby blues affect up to 70 percent of mothers and include mild symptoms of crying and irritability which end by the second week after childbirth. Postpartum-onset depression affects from 7 to 15 percent of mothers and is characterized by sadness, crying, self-blame, loss of control, irritability, anxiety, tension, and sleep difficulties. Factors such as personality, negative feelings toward the infant, marital discord, poor social supports, and ambivalence over parenthood appear to predispose women to the onset of depressive symptoms in the postpartum period.

Postpartum psychosis, the most severe of postpartum mental disorders, occurs in 1 to 2 of 1,000 births and frequently requires hospitalization to stabilize symptoms. ... The disorder is characterized by an extended period of loss of contact with reality that may include auditory or visual hallucinations, delusions, or rapid mood swings. The auditory and visual hallucinations may focus on violence toward self or the infant.

Risk factors for postpartum psychosis can be of both biologic and genetic origins. One study found that the rate of postpartum psychosis in mothers with bipolar disorder was 26 percent, with the rate in mothers with bipolar disorder and a family history of postpartum psychosis increasing to 57 percent. ...

... [R]esearch supports that postpartum psychosis is associated with prominent cognitive disturbances, ranging from mental confusion and indecision to intrusive and bizarre thoughts. Women with this disorder can appear delirious and disorganized. Second, symptoms can arise and dissipate suddenly, with the woman appearing lucid one moment and psychotic the next. Third, although DSM-IV-TR classifies it as a psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, research shows that the syndrome can have both affective and psychotic components.

It has been estimated that four percent of women with postpartum psychosis commit infanticide. ...

The insanity defense is successful in less than 0.1 percent of all criminal trials. However, major population studies, including McKee and Shea, d&#039;Orban, and Bourget and Bradford, found insanity pleas successful in 20, 27, and 15 percent of infanticide cases, respectively. These results suggest that, regardless of the legal or medical guidelines, the law treats women who kill their children with more leniency. Nonetheless, infanticide case outcomes vary extremely. At least two such women have been sentenced to death, whereas some have been released without a prison sentence&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That article is from 2012, and the review of cases goes back a ways before that. So we&#039;re not talking about the result of recent internet social media hysteria influencing trials. Most of the data almost certainly predates the ascendance of social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy K. Laubach:</p>
<p>Post-partum depression was not what Clancy is claiming to have suffered. It is post-partum psychosis, plus exacerbated manic-depression. That&#8217;s a different entity. And yet many people keep saying postpartum depression.  </p>
<p>Postpartum psychosis is rare and postpartum depression is common. But with postpartum psychosis, the person is often at risk for harming or killing her children even through she has shown nothing but love and caring for them in the past.  Postpartum psychosis does not lead to bank robbery or random crimes, when it leads to crimes. It leads to child harming or child murder, usually under the sway of a delusion of some sort, and often coupled with suicide attempts or completed suicide.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://jaapl.org/content/40/3/318" rel="nofollow ugc">this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The postpartum period is the time of highest risk in a woman&#8217;s lifetime for the development of a mental illness. Although the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) defines the postpartum period as the immediate, relatively short time following delivery, in research studies this period has been defined as ranging from a few days to 12 months.</p>
<p>Postpartum-onset psychological problems generally fall into one of three categories: so-called baby blues, postpartum depression, and postpartum psychosis. Baby blues affect up to 70 percent of mothers and include mild symptoms of crying and irritability which end by the second week after childbirth. Postpartum-onset depression affects from 7 to 15 percent of mothers and is characterized by sadness, crying, self-blame, loss of control, irritability, anxiety, tension, and sleep difficulties. Factors such as personality, negative feelings toward the infant, marital discord, poor social supports, and ambivalence over parenthood appear to predispose women to the onset of depressive symptoms in the postpartum period.</p>
<p>Postpartum psychosis, the most severe of postpartum mental disorders, occurs in 1 to 2 of 1,000 births and frequently requires hospitalization to stabilize symptoms. &#8230; The disorder is characterized by an extended period of loss of contact with reality that may include auditory or visual hallucinations, delusions, or rapid mood swings. The auditory and visual hallucinations may focus on violence toward self or the infant.</p>
<p>Risk factors for postpartum psychosis can be of both biologic and genetic origins. One study found that the rate of postpartum psychosis in mothers with bipolar disorder was 26 percent, with the rate in mothers with bipolar disorder and a family history of postpartum psychosis increasing to 57 percent. &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; [R]esearch supports that postpartum psychosis is associated with prominent cognitive disturbances, ranging from mental confusion and indecision to intrusive and bizarre thoughts. Women with this disorder can appear delirious and disorganized. Second, symptoms can arise and dissipate suddenly, with the woman appearing lucid one moment and psychotic the next. Third, although DSM-IV-TR classifies it as a psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, research shows that the syndrome can have both affective and psychotic components.</p>
<p>It has been estimated that four percent of women with postpartum psychosis commit infanticide. &#8230;</p>
<p>The insanity defense is successful in less than 0.1 percent of all criminal trials. However, major population studies, including McKee and Shea, d&#8217;Orban, and Bourget and Bradford, found insanity pleas successful in 20, 27, and 15 percent of infanticide cases, respectively. These results suggest that, regardless of the legal or medical guidelines, the law treats women who kill their children with more leniency. Nonetheless, infanticide case outcomes vary extremely. At least two such women have been sentenced to death, whereas some have been released without a prison sentence</p></blockquote>
<p>That article is from 2012, and the review of cases goes back a ways before that. So we&#8217;re not talking about the result of recent internet social media hysteria influencing trials. Most of the data almost certainly predates the ascendance of social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Molly Brown; huxley:

I have seen nothing whatsoever the anyone has said about Clancy that was negative, prior to her mental/emotional problems after the birth of her third child, and of course the murders.  The idea that she was some sort of hidden violent psychopath (and/or liar) for her entire life and as a mother of her first two children, and no one has reported anything other than exemplary and loving behavior, is I suppose theoretically possible but I think HIGHLY unlikely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Molly Brown; huxley:</p>
<p>I have seen nothing whatsoever the anyone has said about Clancy that was negative, prior to her mental/emotional problems after the birth of her third child, and of course the murders.  The idea that she was some sort of hidden violent psychopath (and/or liar) for her entire life and as a mother of her first two children, and no one has reported anything other than exemplary and loving behavior, is I suppose theoretically possible but I think HIGHLY unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[neo
With regard to SSRI and similar issues in school:
When I was in elementary school toward the middle of the previous century, there were two things we didn&#039;t have;  behaviors requiring drugs, and the drugs themselves.
In the first case, expanded diagnoses are likely part of the issue.  But, still.... Nothing I saw then or heard of from classmates or teachers or parents then or later.

Been mentoring a kid for the last couple of years.  Two of those years I was in an office next to the nurse&#039;s office in an el ed.   Shocked at the number of kids who came in for behavior pills.  Not counting those whose meds were early.  Multiply that by the number of kids in the state and.....  Doesn&#039;t take a high probability of a really negative reaction to end up with a really bad reaction in one.  
  I&#039;ve been prescribed a common sleep aid. The dosage doesn&#039;t work.  Twice as much has a negative reaction.  I have a relation taking, by body weight, ten times my scrip and with no issues at all.
With the size of the iceberg, to use an overused metaphor, even the smallest tip is inevitable,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neo<br />
With regard to SSRI and similar issues in school:<br />
When I was in elementary school toward the middle of the previous century, there were two things we didn&#8217;t have;  behaviors requiring drugs, and the drugs themselves.<br />
In the first case, expanded diagnoses are likely part of the issue.  But, still&#8230;. Nothing I saw then or heard of from classmates or teachers or parents then or later.</p>
<p>Been mentoring a kid for the last couple of years.  Two of those years I was in an office next to the nurse&#8217;s office in an el ed.   Shocked at the number of kids who came in for behavior pills.  Not counting those whose meds were early.  Multiply that by the number of kids in the state and&#8230;..  Doesn&#8217;t take a high probability of a really negative reaction to end up with a really bad reaction in one.<br />
  I&#8217;ve been prescribed a common sleep aid. The dosage doesn&#8217;t work.  Twice as much has a negative reaction.  I have a relation taking, by body weight, ten times my scrip and with no issues at all.<br />
With the size of the iceberg, to use an overused metaphor, even the smallest tip is inevitable,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Goose and gander? How quaint.  Not in the state of Massachusetts, insanity rules there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goose and gander? How quaint.  Not in the state of Massachusetts, insanity rules there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Cook		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.instagram.com/p/Dc0DkW6SY8O/?stkn=YmRnZHB3aWFoMXRv]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/Dc0DkW6SY8O/?stkn=YmRnZHB3aWFoMXRv" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.instagram.com/p/Dc0DkW6SY8O/?stkn=YmRnZHB3aWFoMXRv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/09/05/the-lindsay-clancy-possibilities/#comment-2863287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 07:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=151818#comment-2863287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Was Clancy a habitual liar?

Molly Brown:

I can go there. I&#039;ll agree that it&#039;s possible for a mother to methodically strangle her children while psychotic.

But it is also possible IMO that her psychosis was a cover for malice. Or maybe some combo.

I just don&#039;t know.

But her sympathizers? They are deeply wrong and should know better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Was Clancy a habitual liar?</p>
<p>Molly Brown:</p>
<p>I can go there. I&#8217;ll agree that it&#8217;s possible for a mother to methodically strangle her children while psychotic.</p>
<p>But it is also possible IMO that her psychosis was a cover for malice. Or maybe some combo.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>But her sympathizers? They are deeply wrong and should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
