<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On the LA vote-counting process that is giving LA two leftist Democrats to choose from for mayor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why don’t we just call the LA election amazingly “fortified” and leave it at that?

(Seemed to work pretty well in 2020…etc.)

More importantly, where’s Molly Ball when you really don’t need ‘er …?

File under: Fraudified]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don’t we just call the LA election amazingly “fortified” and leave it at that?</p>
<p>(Seemed to work pretty well in 2020…etc.)</p>
<p>More importantly, where’s Molly Ball when you really don’t need ‘er …?</p>
<p>File under: Fraudified</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Molly Brown		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molly Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles, the city of my birth and early youth.
Now that AI is decimating the last of the film and TV business, I find myself wondering just what kind of  wealth generating industry is left there?
In my lifetime I&#039;ve seen LA drive out oil, small manufacturing (surfboard blanks for Heaven&#039;s sake!), most of aerospace, and now - according to friends in the industry - film and tv are dying.  What are people going to do to earn a living besides rip off the taxpayer?
El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina de los Angeles.
It used to be dynamic.
Now it might as well be Cleveland.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles, the city of my birth and early youth.<br />
Now that AI is decimating the last of the film and TV business, I find myself wondering just what kind of  wealth generating industry is left there?<br />
In my lifetime I&#8217;ve seen LA drive out oil, small manufacturing (surfboard blanks for Heaven&#8217;s sake!), most of aerospace, and now &#8211; according to friends in the industry &#8211; film and tv are dying.  What are people going to do to earn a living besides rip off the taxpayer?<br />
El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina de los Angeles.<br />
It used to be dynamic.<br />
Now it might as well be Cleveland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some commenters at Coffee and Covid pointed out that the identified problems are not technically fraud, since they are all legal.
However, they are certainly unethical and immoral, and contrary to the purpose of the Constitution and Founding of America.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/keep-on-trucking-tuesday-june-9-2026/comment/273224478
GregWA

Before even reading Jeff&#039;s post for today, I have to pass along this from Larry O&#039;Connor at Townhall ( I saw it on X):

Useful Idiot Kristen Welker&#039;s PATHETIC defense of California election fraud DEBUNKED

Larry O&#039;Connor takes Welker to task for the rigged system she&#039;s dismissing.

&quot;The real scandal coming out of California right now is quite possibly every single thing we are seeing transpire before our very eyes is 100% legal.&quot;

O&#039;Connor explains that anyone with a functional brain can see what&#039;s happening in California and know that the election is being stolen.

&quot;You can steal something and not break the law. And that&#039;s what&#039;s happening here. They are stealing it without actually breaking the law.&quot;

As a former Californian resident, O&#039;Connor breaks down the entire process.

&quot;This is the election system in California as we speak. Anybody who is a registered voter gets a ballot mailed to them, and you register to vote because you walk into a DMV, and you automatically get registered no matter what. And as you know, California leads the nation in giving driver&#039;s licenses and registrations to illegal immigrants, people who are in the country illegally, and they&#039;re getting driver&#039;s ed. They&#039;re getting commercial driver&#039;s license in California right now. And when you go through the process, they register you to vote. And there is no check for citizenship. There&#039;s no check for ID, there&#039;s no check for anything. And they&#039;ll register to vote. And you&#039;re on the voter rolls.&quot;

O&#039;Connor even stated he hasn&#039;t lived in Los Angeles County since 2012, and he&#039;s STILL being notified by email that his ballot has been mailed to him.

&quot;I don&#039;t know who&#039;s got it. Whatever address I used to live in has has the Lawrence O&#039;Connor ballot, and I&#039;d love to know if I voted. I probably have without anyone knowing it.&quot;

And then comes the issue of ballot harvesting...

&quot;In California, individuals can go and collect ballots from anyone. They can go and knock on the doors and say, &#039;Hey, give me your ballot. I&#039;ll take care of it for you&#039; legally. And those people who knock on your door and collect your ballot, they call it &#039;ballot harvesting,&#039; they can work for political entities. They can work for political action committees.&quot;

&quot;They can go and they can pick and choose what ballots they want to collect. And they bring them in or they don&#039;t. And every mail in ballot, there is no ID required for every single mail in or drop box ballot. All you&#039;ve got to do is sign the ballot. But of course, it would be discriminatory to allow somebody who is illiterate and can&#039;t write their name to not vote.&quot;

&quot;So when you sign your ballot, you can just make a mark. You can make a smiley face if you want, but it&#039;s witnessed. Don&#039;t worry. There&#039;s a little box for a witness to sign. But of course, there&#039;s no name associated with a witness. It&#039;s just a signature. And oh, by the way, when those ballots are collected, the witness signature isn&#039;t checked.&quot;

&quot;They just check that there is a signature for a witness. So, of course, there&#039;s nothing keeping people from making a little mark on the signature for the voter. And then that same person squiggling the witness box, putting it in an envelope and then having those votes come in. Oh, what else are they doing in California? Well, they allow ballots that come in as late as a week after Election Day to be counted. That doesn&#039;t seem right. Oh. It&#039;s okay. The ballot had to be mailed or put into a Dropbox or delivered by Election Day. But of course, if it&#039;s not postmarked, they&#039;ll overlook that. If there&#039;s no postmark at all on the envelope, they&#039;ll just look at whatever date you put on it and they&#039;ll trust you, and then they&#039;ll count the ballots.&quot;

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Every single thing I just described for you is accurate and legal. They&#039;re not breaking the law. They&#039;re following the laws that they have written so that they can get away with this garbage and everyone knows it.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;
********
Yuri Bezmenov 

&lt;b&gt;California has legalized voter fraud. No ID, automatic registration, universal mail-in ballots, mass harvesting operations, and counting for weeks make it impossible to trust or audit the system. If this happened in any other country we would consider their elections invalid.&lt;/b&gt; Thanks to investigative journalists like James O&#039;Keefe, a woman was federally charged for paying homeless people on skid row to vote. Can TFP do this work instead of parroting MSM talking points that any skepticism is baseless misinformation?

Communists burned down Pratt&#039;s home. Now they have stolen an election from him because they couldn&#039;t let him expose their incompetence and fraud for 5 more months. Raman&#039;s surge is statistically impossible. She was further behind Pratt than he was behind Bass after election night, during which she cried in her speech - all but conceding defeat. Los Angeles will now choose between a foreign-born communist and the incumbent communist. Anyone running cover for this blatant corruption is as much a joke as California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some commenters at Coffee and Covid pointed out that the identified problems are not technically fraud, since they are all legal.<br />
However, they are certainly unethical and immoral, and contrary to the purpose of the Constitution and Founding of America.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/keep-on-trucking-tuesday-june-9-2026/comment/273224478" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/keep-on-trucking-tuesday-june-9-2026/comment/273224478</a><br />
GregWA</p>
<p>Before even reading Jeff&#8217;s post for today, I have to pass along this from Larry O&#8217;Connor at Townhall ( I saw it on X):</p>
<p>Useful Idiot Kristen Welker&#8217;s PATHETIC defense of California election fraud DEBUNKED</p>
<p>Larry O&#8217;Connor takes Welker to task for the rigged system she&#8217;s dismissing.</p>
<p>&#8220;The real scandal coming out of California right now is quite possibly every single thing we are seeing transpire before our very eyes is 100% legal.&#8221;</p>
<p>O&#8217;Connor explains that anyone with a functional brain can see what&#8217;s happening in California and know that the election is being stolen.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can steal something and not break the law. And that&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening here. They are stealing it without actually breaking the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a former Californian resident, O&#8217;Connor breaks down the entire process.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is the election system in California as we speak. Anybody who is a registered voter gets a ballot mailed to them, and you register to vote because you walk into a DMV, and you automatically get registered no matter what. And as you know, California leads the nation in giving driver&#8217;s licenses and registrations to illegal immigrants, people who are in the country illegally, and they&#8217;re getting driver&#8217;s ed. They&#8217;re getting commercial driver&#8217;s license in California right now. And when you go through the process, they register you to vote. And there is no check for citizenship. There&#8217;s no check for ID, there&#8217;s no check for anything. And they&#8217;ll register to vote. And you&#8217;re on the voter rolls.&#8221;</p>
<p>O&#8217;Connor even stated he hasn&#8217;t lived in Los Angeles County since 2012, and he&#8217;s STILL being notified by email that his ballot has been mailed to him.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s got it. Whatever address I used to live in has has the Lawrence O&#8217;Connor ballot, and I&#8217;d love to know if I voted. I probably have without anyone knowing it.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then comes the issue of ballot harvesting&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;In California, individuals can go and collect ballots from anyone. They can go and knock on the doors and say, &#8216;Hey, give me your ballot. I&#8217;ll take care of it for you&#8217; legally. And those people who knock on your door and collect your ballot, they call it &#8216;ballot harvesting,&#8217; they can work for political entities. They can work for political action committees.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They can go and they can pick and choose what ballots they want to collect. And they bring them in or they don&#8217;t. And every mail in ballot, there is no ID required for every single mail in or drop box ballot. All you&#8217;ve got to do is sign the ballot. But of course, it would be discriminatory to allow somebody who is illiterate and can&#8217;t write their name to not vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So when you sign your ballot, you can just make a mark. You can make a smiley face if you want, but it&#8217;s witnessed. Don&#8217;t worry. There&#8217;s a little box for a witness to sign. But of course, there&#8217;s no name associated with a witness. It&#8217;s just a signature. And oh, by the way, when those ballots are collected, the witness signature isn&#8217;t checked.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They just check that there is a signature for a witness. So, of course, there&#8217;s nothing keeping people from making a little mark on the signature for the voter. And then that same person squiggling the witness box, putting it in an envelope and then having those votes come in. Oh, what else are they doing in California? Well, they allow ballots that come in as late as a week after Election Day to be counted. That doesn&#8217;t seem right. Oh. It&#8217;s okay. The ballot had to be mailed or put into a Dropbox or delivered by Election Day. But of course, if it&#8217;s not postmarked, they&#8217;ll overlook that. If there&#8217;s no postmark at all on the envelope, they&#8217;ll just look at whatever date you put on it and they&#8217;ll trust you, and then they&#8217;ll count the ballots.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>&#8220;Every single thing I just described for you is accurate and legal. They&#8217;re not breaking the law. They&#8217;re following the laws that they have written so that they can get away with this garbage and everyone knows it.&#8221;</b><br />
********<br />
Yuri Bezmenov </p>
<p><b>California has legalized voter fraud. No ID, automatic registration, universal mail-in ballots, mass harvesting operations, and counting for weeks make it impossible to trust or audit the system. If this happened in any other country we would consider their elections invalid.</b> Thanks to investigative journalists like James O&#8217;Keefe, a woman was federally charged for paying homeless people on skid row to vote. Can TFP do this work instead of parroting MSM talking points that any skepticism is baseless misinformation?</p>
<p>Communists burned down Pratt&#8217;s home. Now they have stolen an election from him because they couldn&#8217;t let him expose their incompetence and fraud for 5 more months. Raman&#8217;s surge is statistically impossible. She was further behind Pratt than he was behind Bass after election night, during which she cried in her speech &#8211; all but conceding defeat. Los Angeles will now choose between a foreign-born communist and the incumbent communist. Anyone running cover for this blatant corruption is as much a joke as California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R2L		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just when does the Article IV Section 4 promise that &quot;The United States shall &quot;guarantee&quot; to &quot;every&quot; State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, ...  &quot;  [scare quotes added as my emphasis]    actually come into play.  How problematical must the situation become that some form of federal &quot;take over&quot; of a state&#039;s government is justified?  There have been selective judicial controls over school boards and racial integration, etc. Probably a few other cases I can&#039;t recall.

Such a federal level take-over certainly becomes more difficult if the Congress is divided, the Presidential office is not fully endorsed by enough people or supported by the sub-agencies, or if the Judiciary is excessively partisan.

But in some ways it becomes a secession in fact, if not in law or explicitly claimed via proclamation.

Related to this topic but off topic: earlier this evening I read this L&#038;L article that I believe  neophiles will find meritorious.  https://lawliberty.org/book-review/a-strict-construction-handbook/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when does the Article IV Section 4 promise that &#8220;The United States shall &#8220;guarantee&#8221; to &#8220;every&#8221; State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, &#8230;  &#8221;  [scare quotes added as my emphasis]    actually come into play.  How problematical must the situation become that some form of federal &#8220;take over&#8221; of a state&#8217;s government is justified?  There have been selective judicial controls over school boards and racial integration, etc. Probably a few other cases I can&#8217;t recall.</p>
<p>Such a federal level take-over certainly becomes more difficult if the Congress is divided, the Presidential office is not fully endorsed by enough people or supported by the sub-agencies, or if the Judiciary is excessively partisan.</p>
<p>But in some ways it becomes a secession in fact, if not in law or explicitly claimed via proclamation.</p>
<p>Related to this topic but off topic: earlier this evening I read this L&amp;L article that I believe  neophiles will find meritorious.  <a href="https://lawliberty.org/book-review/a-strict-construction-handbook/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://lawliberty.org/book-review/a-strict-construction-handbook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They must cheat in order to steal and their theft has been legendary tens of billions just in one states

The possums like cornyn or dewine or cassidy dont care how much is wasted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They must cheat in order to steal and their theft has been legendary tens of billions just in one states</p>
<p>The possums like cornyn or dewine or cassidy dont care how much is wasted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some people are calling for anomolies to be investigated.

Bauxite defaults to the &quot;nothing to see, move along&quot; because, reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people are calling for anomolies to be investigated.</p>
<p>Bauxite defaults to the &#8220;nothing to see, move along&#8221; because, reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Den of locusts

https://open.substack.com/pub/insurrectionbarbie/p/the-board-that-runs-los-angeles?

Probabilities of time and number of ballots suggest fraud along with no chain of custody no voter id good faith attestations of the vote

How did trump win seven states but lose four senate seats 

Its not the candidates its the system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Den of locusts</p>
<p><a href="https://open.substack.com/pub/insurrectionbarbie/p/the-board-that-runs-los-angeles" rel="nofollow ugc">https://open.substack.com/pub/insurrectionbarbie/p/the-board-that-runs-los-angeles</a>?</p>
<p>Probabilities of time and number of ballots suggest fraud along with no chain of custody no voter id good faith attestations of the vote</p>
<p>How did trump win seven states but lose four senate seats </p>
<p>Its not the candidates its the system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Niketas Choniates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Bauxite:&lt;i&gt;If you don’t have evidence of fraud, don’t. It’s not that hard.&lt;/i&gt;

You don&#039;t get it without looking for it, and the first place to look is anomalies. It&#039;s not wrong for people to call attention to the anomalies and say &quot;this looks like fraud&quot;. Without that there&#039;s no investigation. When you find a stabbed body it&#039;s legitimate to say &quot;this looks likes murder&quot; even if you find video later showing he just fell on a knife four times.

They are right, it does &quot;look like&quot; fraud. It may not be, and probably isn&#039;t, the kind of fraud they are thinking of. If they find that the vast majority of Raman&#039;s ballots are legitimate but that 100,000 or even 1000 of her votes were General Delivery filled out by a team of SEIU workers two days later, they will never know without digging in, and they would need to expose that as part of any effort of getting people to support California&#039;s laws being changed.

People on our side are calling for it to be dug into. They should.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bauxite:<i>If you don’t have evidence of fraud, don’t. It’s not that hard.</i></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get it without looking for it, and the first place to look is anomalies. It&#8217;s not wrong for people to call attention to the anomalies and say &#8220;this looks like fraud&#8221;. Without that there&#8217;s no investigation. When you find a stabbed body it&#8217;s legitimate to say &#8220;this looks likes murder&#8221; even if you find video later showing he just fell on a knife four times.</p>
<p>They are right, it does &#8220;look like&#8221; fraud. It may not be, and probably isn&#8217;t, the kind of fraud they are thinking of. If they find that the vast majority of Raman&#8217;s ballots are legitimate but that 100,000 or even 1000 of her votes were General Delivery filled out by a team of SEIU workers two days later, they will never know without digging in, and they would need to expose that as part of any effort of getting people to support California&#8217;s laws being changed.</p>
<p>People on our side are calling for it to be dug into. They should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bauxite		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bauxite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Niketas Choniates - Of course, if there&#039;s evidence of fraud, call it out. If you don&#039;t have evidence of fraud, don&#039;t.  It&#039;s not that hard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niketas Choniates &#8211; Of course, if there&#8217;s evidence of fraud, call it out. If you don&#8217;t have evidence of fraud, don&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s not that hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Niketas Choniates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/06/08/on-the-la-vote-counting-process-that-is-giving-la-two-leftist-democrats-to-choose-from-for-mayor/#comment-2854147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=149757#comment-2854147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@skip:&lt;i&gt;A question I don’t know the answer nor how to find out.
% of possible voters in other states who vote
% of California voters who vote&lt;/i&gt;

Key word is &quot;turnout&quot;. Here&#039;s one &lt;a href=&quot;https://election.lab.ufl.edu/voter-turnout/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;source&lt;/a&gt; for those numbers. Found by typing &quot;election day turnout %&quot; into a search engine. If you need more info, the power is in your hands, and you need never wonder again.

This source has 46% of people eligible to vote nationally actually voting in the general election in 2022, and California was 43%.

For 2024, these numbers were 64% and 62% respectively, reflecting the changes in how elections have been done plus the higher turnouts in presidential elections.

They won&#039;t have 2026 numbers for a year or so yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@skip:<i>A question I don’t know the answer nor how to find out.<br />
% of possible voters in other states who vote<br />
% of California voters who vote</i></p>
<p>Key word is &#8220;turnout&#8221;. Here&#8217;s one <a href="https://election.lab.ufl.edu/voter-turnout/" rel="nofollow ugc">source</a> for those numbers. Found by typing &#8220;election day turnout %&#8221; into a search engine. If you need more info, the power is in your hands, and you need never wonder again.</p>
<p>This source has 46% of people eligible to vote nationally actually voting in the general election in 2022, and California was 43%.</p>
<p>For 2024, these numbers were 64% and 62% respectively, reflecting the changes in how elections have been done plus the higher turnouts in presidential elections.</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t have 2026 numbers for a year or so yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
