<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 04:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TJ		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 04:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unlike rhe &quot;sanctuary cities&quot; rebelling against rhe law, Republican States have witnessed falling rates of crime. 

On FNC this week (Tuesday?), Laura Ingraham interviewed economist Peter St. Onge with details proving this case...Fox posts these online after that air date,  but I am yet to find it.

I only cought the end myself. I&#039;d like hear it all!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike rhe &#8220;sanctuary cities&#8221; rebelling against rhe law, Republican States have witnessed falling rates of crime. </p>
<p>On FNC this week (Tuesday?), Laura Ingraham interviewed economist Peter St. Onge with details proving this case&#8230;Fox posts these online after that air date,  but I am yet to find it.</p>
<p>I only cought the end myself. I&#8217;d like hear it all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R2L		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SHIREHOME on January 16, 2026 at 3:46 pm said:
&quot;They keep asking if Men can become Pregnant. How about asking if Women have a Prostate?&quot;
Some years ago I was in a library and happened to pick up a book by Stephen J. Gould.
Flipping it open I came across some discussion of the homology between male and female sexual organs/ components - i.e., they have a common source during embryo development and then &quot;specialize&quot; by sex as it matures.  So after a fashion a woman does have a &quot;prostate&quot; and we call it a uterus.  Or a man has a uterus and we call it a &quot;prostate&quot;.  And so on for several other elements of physiology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHIREHOME on January 16, 2026 at 3:46 pm said:<br />
&#8220;They keep asking if Men can become Pregnant. How about asking if Women have a Prostate?&#8221;<br />
Some years ago I was in a library and happened to pick up a book by Stephen J. Gould.<br />
Flipping it open I came across some discussion of the homology between male and female sexual organs/ components &#8211; i.e., they have a common source during embryo development and then &#8220;specialize&#8221; by sex as it matures.  So after a fashion a woman does have a &#8220;prostate&#8221; and we call it a uterus.  Or a man has a uterus and we call it a &#8220;prostate&#8221;.  And so on for several other elements of physiology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 01:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom Grey:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Men’s sports should be replaced by Open sports, to allow women, trannies, &#038; the disabled to all compete with the Same Rules. All genders equal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Nope&lt;/b&gt;.

Not too clever, the left never stops.  The trannies want to dominate the girls and women.  Why, because they are sick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Grey:</p>
<blockquote><p>Men’s sports should be replaced by Open sports, to allow women, trannies, &amp; the disabled to all compete with the Same Rules. All genders equal.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>Nope</b>.</p>
<p>Not too clever, the left never stops.  The trannies want to dominate the girls and women.  Why, because they are sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Grey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Grey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 01:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Men’s sports should be replaced by Open sports, to allow women, trannies, &#038; the disabled to all compete with the Same Rules. All genders equal.

There should be XX women’s sports for the XX girls who identify as women. There should be special Olympics for the disabled. 

Free humans have the choice to reject being males, or females, despite having XY or XX chromosomes &#038; matching genitalia.  Their individual rejection of reality doesn’t make them the other sex—the tranny movement is right that genders are more than two, so those males disabled (sterile) sexually who reject being men should be labeled otherwise, Strongly.
Weakly, I suggest q’women, to be courteous to them, or q’man for the XX females who reject being women. Q’she &#038; q’he, q’her &#038; q’him, become the pronouns.  All legally able to compete in the Opensports with the men. Who dominate.

All such trannies should be fine calling him the Shah; I prefer Crown Prince.

Trump’s uncertain support means he can agree to better post revolution terms, but reduces the chances of regime change. I hope he’s using more time to plan so that when, not if, he attacks, there is a minimum of US casualties.

Iran casualties are far less Important except as PR justification. 

I’m glad there is a Department of War.  I wish, but don’t expect, that Trump asks for a declaration of war against Iran for their Crimes Against Humanity.  Make the Dems either support it, abstain, or accept Iranian murdering thousands yet staying in power.

I think Trump is waiting for Israel.  Suspect the Iranian people will reduce their Big Protesting only after losing some 20-40 k civilians butchered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men’s sports should be replaced by Open sports, to allow women, trannies, &amp; the disabled to all compete with the Same Rules. All genders equal.</p>
<p>There should be XX women’s sports for the XX girls who identify as women. There should be special Olympics for the disabled. </p>
<p>Free humans have the choice to reject being males, or females, despite having XY or XX chromosomes &amp; matching genitalia.  Their individual rejection of reality doesn’t make them the other sex—the tranny movement is right that genders are more than two, so those males disabled (sterile) sexually who reject being men should be labeled otherwise, Strongly.<br />
Weakly, I suggest q’women, to be courteous to them, or q’man for the XX females who reject being women. Q’she &amp; q’he, q’her &amp; q’him, become the pronouns.  All legally able to compete in the Opensports with the men. Who dominate.</p>
<p>All such trannies should be fine calling him the Shah; I prefer Crown Prince.</p>
<p>Trump’s uncertain support means he can agree to better post revolution terms, but reduces the chances of regime change. I hope he’s using more time to plan so that when, not if, he attacks, there is a minimum of US casualties.</p>
<p>Iran casualties are far less Important except as PR justification. </p>
<p>I’m glad there is a Department of War.  I wish, but don’t expect, that Trump asks for a declaration of war against Iran for their Crimes Against Humanity.  Make the Dems either support it, abstain, or accept Iranian murdering thousands yet staying in power.</p>
<p>I think Trump is waiting for Israel.  Suspect the Iranian people will reduce their Big Protesting only after losing some 20-40 k civilians butchered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837858</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;In 1980, following the death of his father in exile in Cairo, Egypt, Reza Pahlavi declared himself shah of Iran...&lt;/i&gt; 

Declared himself? That&#039;s not cricket, he disqualifies himself.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Most have probably seen the video of Senator Hawley asking an ob-gyn a simple question, “can men get pregnant.” This is where the left is.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  Brian E 

Where they are indeed.

George Orwell spoke of one form of dissimulation. &lt;i&gt;&quot;When there is a gap between one&#039;s real and one&#039;s declared aims, one turns, as it were instinctively, to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

The refusal to answer is of course another but a refusal to answer a simple question about basic terms is an implicit admission of intellectual bankruptcy. And, when they witness it, more and more are recognizing it. Amply demonstrated by Trump&#039;s votes in Nov 2023 among Hispanic and black voters.

 The democrat party has descended into self-parody and no one likes realizing  they&#039;re being played for a fool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;In 1980, following the death of his father in exile in Cairo, Egypt, Reza Pahlavi declared himself shah of Iran&#8230;</i> </p>
<p>Declared himself? That&#8217;s not cricket, he disqualifies himself.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Most have probably seen the video of Senator Hawley asking an ob-gyn a simple question, “can men get pregnant.” This is where the left is.&#8221;</i>  Brian E </p>
<p>Where they are indeed.</p>
<p>George Orwell spoke of one form of dissimulation. <i>&#8220;When there is a gap between one&#8217;s real and one&#8217;s declared aims, one turns, as it were instinctively, to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>The refusal to answer is of course another but a refusal to answer a simple question about basic terms is an implicit admission of intellectual bankruptcy. And, when they witness it, more and more are recognizing it. Amply demonstrated by Trump&#8217;s votes in Nov 2023 among Hispanic and black voters.</p>
<p> The democrat party has descended into self-parody and no one likes realizing  they&#8217;re being played for a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sennacherib		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sennacherib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 23:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Strange as it may seem they&#039;ve lost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange as it may seem they&#8217;ve lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vv		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great news about VD Hanson, finally!  Sobering, but good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news about VD Hanson, finally!  Sobering, but good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Skip		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837815</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can only hope the best for VDH
Marx thought no one should own anything,  especially property
The Supreme Court doest rule against this Culture Marxism and humans get to pick their sex, we are screwed. Suspect they will weasel out somehow. 
I couldn&#039;t care what Iran does after they overthrow the Mullahs
And that protester will learn the hard way sitting in prison I hope.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can only hope the best for VDH<br />
Marx thought no one should own anything,  especially property<br />
The Supreme Court doest rule against this Culture Marxism and humans get to pick their sex, we are screwed. Suspect they will weasel out somehow.<br />
I couldn&#8217;t care what Iran does after they overthrow the Mullahs<br />
And that protester will learn the hard way sitting in prison I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Niketas Choniates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@SHIREHOME:&lt;i&gt;How about asking if Women have a Prostate?&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, but are there not men who don&#039;t have a prostate? (You should imagine this asked in the voice of Sir Bedivere, who was so wise in the ways of science.) When a man has his prostate removed do we expect him afterward to use the women&#039;s bathroom, wear a dress, etc? Do we put guards in the bathroom to check who does and doesn&#039;t have a prostate?

There&#039;s no point in playing definition games with the Left, that&#039;s their ground. They will always claim that one exception or edge case makes all categories invalid when they wish, or dismiss a host of exceptions as meaningless when they choose.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SHIREHOME:<i>How about asking if Women have a Prostate?</i></p>
<p>Ah, but are there not men who don&#8217;t have a prostate? (You should imagine this asked in the voice of Sir Bedivere, who was so wise in the ways of science.) When a man has his prostate removed do we expect him afterward to use the women&#8217;s bathroom, wear a dress, etc? Do we put guards in the bathroom to check who does and doesn&#8217;t have a prostate?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no point in playing definition games with the Left, that&#8217;s their ground. They will always claim that one exception or edge case makes all categories invalid when they wish, or dismiss a host of exceptions as meaningless when they choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SHIREHOME		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2026/01/16/another-roundup-4/#comment-2837810</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SHIREHOME]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=146820#comment-2837810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They keep asking if Men can become Pregnant. How about asking if Women have a Prostate? If the answer is NO (as it should be), then ask how then can a woman be called a Man?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They keep asking if Men can become Pregnant. How about asking if Women have a Prostate? If the answer is NO (as it should be), then ask how then can a woman be called a Man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
