I don’t know where this is going. I don’t know where this Jew hatred from the Marxists, the Islamists, the neo-Nazis, the grifters, I don’t know where they’re pulling us and pushing us. What do they want to do with American Jews? What do they want to do? Where are they taking this country? They’re destroying it. Carlson, Owens, Kelly, Bannon, the rest of them and others.

To be completely fair, it is possible (although it’s perhaps a bit of a reach) to interperate that as Levin accusing Kelly of being a Nazi. Levin grouped together these categorizations (Marxists, the Islamists, neo-Nazis, and grifters) and connected those to another group (Carlson, Owens, Kelly, Bannon, the rest of them and others) by asking-then-answering “They’re destroying it” followed by the defining of group B. So it’s a bit ambigious since its left to the listener/viewer to infer how any one or more of the categorizations (group A) may be assigned to any of the the people (group B) I guess. But this ain’t a court of law. Rather this is an almost entirely extemporaneous rant of a talk who host.

Megyn who?

Jasmine who?

Tucker who?

Those people are less than nothing to me. I despise them all equally.

I also despise the political leanings of nearly all of the Kennedy clan but wouldn’t wish leukemia on anyone.

Those who invited the Somali grifting cult into our country need a brain transplant. Or perhaps they’ve already had one from a donor named Abby Normal.

Agreed, the is also something I think is seriously undervalued. I think I have made my stance on Putin, his regime, his wars, and the wider dysfunctions of Russia clear. I hate Putin. But that being said, by historic standards he has been a shockingly mild despot, and a relatively decentralized or “weak” strong man compared to the supposedly absolute power of the Princes of Vladimir and Tsars of Moscow and St Petersburg. Moreover he has been under fire in part for things like his corruption, repression, shakedowns, wars, and creeping Islmaicization from the “Chechen Lobby”, but also from many that view him as too soft or indecisive. I would hesitate to say he is too mild or soft for most Russians, as he mostly represents a hardened anti-Western cadre of former organs members and assorted oligarchs in what we might call the old Soviet “deep state” and has taken pains to clamp down on civil society (even the wooing of removing pro-regimes pro-war demonstrations if he cannot control them). Several of his most stalwart critics in that ecosystem are worse than he is.

I hate the man and consider him a mass murderer, a tyrant, and someone who has treated his country and people as expendable with a willingness to abandon their future for his late life creature comforts. But he might be better than many of those that could replace him.

That does not mean j believe we can get around the ultimate destruction of him or his regime, dirty a term as “regime change” may be. But we have to try and pre-empt the sort of ecosystem he emerged from or other bad actors like the Duginifes, Kadyrovsty, Neo-Bolsheviks, and so on from taking power after him.

Have you read any of Glenn Greenwald’s stuff on Israel, post 10/7? He is pretty much on the same page as Carlson on Israel – very very negative, it’s committing genocide in Gaza, etc.. He may be an independent journalist in the sense that he doesn’t belong to any one media outlet, but he’s hardly objective on Israel. This attitude of Greenwald’s predates Carlson’s anti-Israel viciousness. See, for example, this as well as this for some of Greenwald’s older views, and see this for Greenwald’s “genocide” accusations against Israel.

And American Conservative was started by Pat Buchanan and has continued in that vein, so it also would be expected to be on Carlson’s side and against Levin.

By the way, Levin did not call Carlson a Nazi. He said this, according to your Daily Mail link:

‘”I want nothing to do with you, what you’ve become — your vile libels against my faith, millions of Christians, and in my view, what you seek do to our country,”‘ Levin said he wrote back.

‘”There’s nothing to debate. You’re a Nazi promoter.

‘”You’re the modern day David Duke,”‘ he added, referring to a Klu Klux Klan leader who was a Republican member of the Louisiana House of Representatives in the nineties who parroted anti-Semitic conspiracies.

The only thing there with which I would disagree is the comparison to David Duke. The proper comparison, IMHO, is more like Father Coughlin, who was basically a media personality (and priest, but Tucker doesn’t resemble that aspect of him) who spread conspiracy theories about Jews.

For example – sound familiar?:

In the days and weeks after Kristallnacht, Coughlin defended the state-sponsored violence of the Nazi regime. He argued that Kristallnacht was justified as retaliation for Jewish persecution of Christians. He explained to his listeners on November 20, 1938, that the “communistic government of Russia,” “the Lenins and Trotskys…atheistic Jews and Gentiles,” had murdered more than 20 million Christians and had stolen “40 billion [dollars]…of Christian property.”

For years Coughlin publicly derided “international bankers,” a phrase that most of his listeners understood to mean Jewish bankers. Such antisemitic views were expressed on the pages of Social Justice. In a series of articles published in 1938, Coughlin lambasted “Jewish” financiers and their control over world politics. These articles culminated with a story recounting his own version of the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion. This antisemitic publication falsely purported to be minutes from meetings of Jewish leaders who were plotting to take over the world.

[Megyn]Kelly would add, “And if you watch that interview that he did with him, I personally am convinced it was about Tucker trying to reach Fuentes, not Tucker trying to launch Fuentes in a bigger and more profound way onto the national scale.”

That’s certainly what I saw. Kelly noted that Carlson treated his interviews with controversial macho-man Andrew Tate and Iran’s president in the same way, in his own style.

The independent journalist Glenn Greenwald had a similar take, “The claim that Tucker didn’t ‘push back’ on any of Fuentes’ views is the byproduct either of not having watched the interview and/or extreme dishonesty. Most of it was about their differing views and argumentation.”

The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh was also criticized for not denouncing Carlson. After Trump also refused to do so, he posted on X, “So will Trump also be denounced as a ‘coward’ and ‘woke right’ by all of the people who called me and Megyn Kelly that for refusing to disavow Tucker?”

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/will-mark-levin-denounce-trump-for-refusing-to-condemn-tucker-carlson/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-15274169/fox-news-host-mark-levin-tucker-carlson-nazi.html

Ray, we’re lucky to get even 10% of the story in Russia. And not just because of media failure though they’re certainly not helping. Russia has long been a closed society, difficult to penetrate. We could be in for some rude surprises when Putin passes from the scene whether by natural causes or otherwise.

“Zohran Mamdani’s dad compares Israel to apartheid-era, calls Holocaust survivors ‘today’s perpetrators’ in resurfaced video”—
https://nypost.com/2025/11/23/us-news/mahmood-mamdani-compares-israel-to-apartheid-era-calls-holocaust-survivors-todays-perpetrators-in-resurfaced-video/

To be compared/contrasted with…

“Zohran Mamdani says Trump is still a ‘fascist, despot’ — but claims they agree on most important issue facing NYC”—
https://nypost.com/2025/11/23/us-news/zohran-mamdani-says-trump-is-still-a-fascist-despot-but-claims-they-agree-on-most-important-issue-facing-nyc/

“’Vote By Phone?’ – Swalwell’s Plan To Modernize Voting Could Put Election Integrity at Risk Nationwide”—
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/vote-phone-swalwells-plan-modernize-voting-could-put-election-integrity-risk-nationwide

Because there isn’t enough dishonesty and there’s not enough crises!