To be sure, there’s probably no need for Summers to do this—all he really has to do is “stand athwart history” and shriek vicious anti-Trump imprecations from the rooftops of Harvard’s hallowed (if hollowed-out) halls…

(Alas for him, Summers Agonistes is neither the right gender nor the appropriate race, which means that that that gambit will likely not work as well as it would otherwise… )

“Democrat Plaskett Digs Deeper Grave On Epstein Ties”—
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrat-plaskett-digs-deeper-grave-epstein-ties

* See https://joehoft.com/covering-up-the-behavioral-health-links-to-mass-murders-and-assassinations/

I know about the flight logs. What I mean is things like Stacey Plaskett texting with Epstein during Congressional hearings and him giving her real time advice on questions to answer (not to mention her casual interaction with him). This is just one example. As far as I know, that’s new information.

Men in a relationship who had sex with willing women provided by Epstein? Exposure might do more damage to family relations than the act itself.

Kind of like homosexuals in the closet being outed. They may have been humiliated, and families destroyed because some militant gay exposed them.

Another example, adopted kids seeking birth parents. Fine and dandy if parents family is aware there was a baby given up. Potential disaster otherwise.

The way the online world works, “seems new” doesn’t mean much. Old news is continually recycled and presented as new as long as it drives clicks.

We’ve seen this phenomenon on this very site more than once over 2024 and 2025. Not that neo is deliberately exhuming old news for clicks, but when people online start writing about something like it’s new she’ll point out that it’s actually old. (A lot of the post-debate commentary on Biden’s brain was of this nature, stuff that had already been reported somewhere but legacy media was finally talking about like it was new.)

With Epstein, it’s just the same stuff over and over and it’s only what people are talking about on any given day that changes. For example, the “little black book” has been online since 2015, and six years ago a journalist actually called every number in it and wrote about it. Flight logs been online for years, knock yourself out.

Whatever it is people are talking about on a given day is something that they’ve seized on from something that’s already been out there and have just decided to talk about that now, in most cases. But not really new. It’s like a forest was cut down years ago, and no one heard the trees fall at the time, and five years later they’re doing reports on one downed tree every week…

Perhaps, but some of the stuff we have recently seen seems new, and has made things a bit more difficult for the Democrats. And it is clear the Democrats are only interested because they thought it would hurt Trump. It seems like everything they do backfires.

Her father was a communist official working on the Belt and Road imitative.

She wrote:

• The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism, May 16, 2023.[18] In The New China Playbook, Jin writes that China has achieved significant progress without following the “Western path” and its innovation and technological development challenge the view that China must converge with Western economic systems and political persuasions to continue its development.[5]:?136? The book takes a positive view of China’s mechanisms of state-led economic intervention.[5]:?136–137?

AI replied with this when I asked if she was a member of the Chinese communist party:

“Keyu Jin has described herself as a “proud Youth League member of the Communist Party” during her youth in China. The Youth League is the youth wing of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC).
While this indicates past membership in the youth organization, public information about her career as a global economist and academic does not explicitly state whether she is a current, official member of the full Chinese Communist Party”

Not only that, gave her a racist nickname. Funny that no one seems to be commenting on that. He and Epstein referred to her as “peril”.

Of course in the privilege stack East Asian may as well be white with respect to any other group except whites.