<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Open thread 10/30/2025	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 01:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R2L		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 01:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am very careful not to click on links in emails or phone text messages where the source is sketchy. I will click on links from trusted sources, such as from friends or someone posting like Miguel or other &quot;resident&quot; commenters here.

But I agree with Selfy that there is an etiquette issue that more information should be provided, especially as with Substack and other venues, where the link is often a redirect and does not really contain the title or related content indications. 

Just please don&#039;t pull up a past comment where I failed to so myself!  :-)  
But thanks to Huxley or someone here, I now regularly only cut and past the portion of a longish link that is to the left of the &quot;?&quot; symbol [since I think he or whomever said the rest of the link content is related to my email or other source server, etc. and of little value to another recipient. ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very careful not to click on links in emails or phone text messages where the source is sketchy. I will click on links from trusted sources, such as from friends or someone posting like Miguel or other &#8220;resident&#8221; commenters here.</p>
<p>But I agree with Selfy that there is an etiquette issue that more information should be provided, especially as with Substack and other venues, where the link is often a redirect and does not really contain the title or related content indications. </p>
<p>Just please don&#8217;t pull up a past comment where I failed to so myself!  🙂<br />
But thanks to Huxley or someone here, I now regularly only cut and past the portion of a longish link that is to the left of the &#8220;?&#8221; symbol [since I think he or whomever said the rest of the link content is related to my email or other source server, etc. and of little value to another recipient. ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Selfy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selfy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t open &lt;b&gt;any&lt;/b&gt; links that don&#039;t include a description.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t open <b>any</b> links that don&#8217;t include a description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AesopFan, once I went with a church choir to sing some hymns in a dementia center. One of the patients was a dear friend. She looked at us with a puzzled look, not really recognizing us, but she sang along with the hymns. I was glad to give her that moment.

I agree about Miguel&#039;s quick links. They&#039;re usually X posts. I can look quickly and not be subjected to You Tube ads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AesopFan, once I went with a church choir to sing some hymns in a dementia center. One of the patients was a dear friend. She looked at us with a puzzled look, not really recognizing us, but she sang along with the hymns. I was glad to give her that moment.</p>
<p>I agree about Miguel&#8217;s quick links. They&#8217;re usually X posts. I can look quickly and not be subjected to You Tube ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This from Byron York was rather amusing. (h/t Powerline Picks)
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3869993/alvin-bragg-and-trump-trial-that-never-happened/

&quot;It happened during a debate in the contest for district attorney of Manhattan. The only reason most non-New Yorkers would care is that current Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose claim to fame is being the first and only prosecutor ever to charge and convict an ex-president — Donald Trump — is running for reelection.
Here’s the curious thing. In the entire debate, which was Bragg against Republican Maud Maron and independent Diana Florence, moderated by NY1’s Errol Louis — in the entire debate, nobody said the name “Donald Trump.” With the exception of one brief aside by Louis, nobody mentioned the Trump prosecution at all. 

The trial is the biggest professional accomplishment of Bragg’s life. He is now running for reelection. He is running on his record. And he never said a word about it. Nor did Maron or Florence bring it up. It was like Bragg’s central role in history never happened at all.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from Byron York was rather amusing. (h/t Powerline Picks)<br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3869993/alvin-bragg-and-trump-trial-that-never-happened/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3869993/alvin-bragg-and-trump-trial-that-never-happened/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It happened during a debate in the contest for district attorney of Manhattan. The only reason most non-New Yorkers would care is that current Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose claim to fame is being the first and only prosecutor ever to charge and convict an ex-president — Donald Trump — is running for reelection.<br />
Here’s the curious thing. In the entire debate, which was Bragg against Republican Maud Maron and independent Diana Florence, moderated by NY1’s Errol Louis — in the entire debate, nobody said the name “Donald Trump.” With the exception of one brief aside by Louis, nobody mentioned the Trump prosecution at all. </p>
<p>The trial is the biggest professional accomplishment of Bragg’s life. He is now running for reelection. He is running on his record. And he never said a word about it. Nor did Maron or Florence bring it up. It was like Bragg’s central role in history never happened at all.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Kate - I also skip the unidentified YouTube links, but Miguel usually hits a winner on his cryptic offerings. Here&#039;s today&#039;s: &quot;This is what lawfare and demonization has yielded&quot;

Tweet commenting on a headline from The Atlantic: 
&quot;At least 6 senior Trump officials [are] living on military bases for their safety.  
This does not happen in normal countries. Left-wing political violence is out of control. 
Presumably because left-wing judges have protected them for 50 years.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kate &#8211; I also skip the unidentified YouTube links, but Miguel usually hits a winner on his cryptic offerings. Here&#8217;s today&#8217;s: &#8220;This is what lawfare and demonization has yielded&#8221;</p>
<p>Tweet commenting on a headline from The Atlantic:<br />
&#8220;At least 6 senior Trump officials [are] living on military bases for their safety.<br />
This does not happen in normal countries. Left-wing political violence is out of control.<br />
Presumably because left-wing judges have protected them for 50 years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The song-sharing street singer is one of my favorite recurring &quot;guest artists,&quot; and this was one of his best. I especially liked the video at the end, sent by the old woman&#039;s nephew, about how she had started singing around the house again.

Her voice was not too shabby for 93; you could tell she was indeed operatically trained (catch one of our current pop stars singing at that age!), and I was delighted she could remember all the words!

I find myself starting a lot of old favorites and lalalaing around the middle of the first verse.

Fun trivia: Oliver Sacks, who has made a study of various brain glitches, conveyed in several popular books (&quot;The Man Who Thought His Wife Was a Hat&quot; was his first IIRC), wrote one about the impact of brain injuries and other problems on musical ability. Interesting to me was that the memories of music known in the past are often the last thing lost by dementia patients.
They may not know who is visiting them, but they can sing along with the Golden Oldies.

But they have to be THEIR oldies. 
I&#039;ve been talking with a friend about singing in some of the local nursing homes, and we realized that we were thinking about &quot;Tinpan Alley&quot; songs, because that&#039;s what we sang years ago when visiting as youth groups. Now, we would be singing to our own generation or only slightly more elderly - the Beetles and John Denver are the oldies!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The song-sharing street singer is one of my favorite recurring &#8220;guest artists,&#8221; and this was one of his best. I especially liked the video at the end, sent by the old woman&#8217;s nephew, about how she had started singing around the house again.</p>
<p>Her voice was not too shabby for 93; you could tell she was indeed operatically trained (catch one of our current pop stars singing at that age!), and I was delighted she could remember all the words!</p>
<p>I find myself starting a lot of old favorites and lalalaing around the middle of the first verse.</p>
<p>Fun trivia: Oliver Sacks, who has made a study of various brain glitches, conveyed in several popular books (&#8220;The Man Who Thought His Wife Was a Hat&#8221; was his first IIRC), wrote one about the impact of brain injuries and other problems on musical ability. Interesting to me was that the memories of music known in the past are often the last thing lost by dementia patients.<br />
They may not know who is visiting them, but they can sing along with the Golden Oldies.</p>
<p>But they have to be THEIR oldies.<br />
I&#8217;ve been talking with a friend about singing in some of the local nursing homes, and we realized that we were thinking about &#8220;Tinpan Alley&#8221; songs, because that&#8217;s what we sang years ago when visiting as youth groups. Now, we would be singing to our own generation or only slightly more elderly &#8211; the Beetles and John Denver are the oldies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Selfy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selfy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 04:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don’t read posts of what Chat or Grok say, and I don’t look at You Tube links without some explanation as to what they’re about.&quot;
Ditto.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t read posts of what Chat or Grok say, and I don’t look at You Tube links without some explanation as to what they’re about.&#8221;<br />
Ditto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.stevesailer.net/p/what-else-should-trump-tear-down
==
Sailer has some horrific examples of bad architecture.  Now, if we restricted the choice to federal real estate...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.stevesailer.net/p/what-else-should-trump-tear-down" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.stevesailer.net/p/what-else-should-trump-tear-down</a><br />
==<br />
Sailer has some horrific examples of bad architecture.  Now, if we restricted the choice to federal real estate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not that it matters to anyone but me, but I don&#039;t read posts of what Chat or Grok say, and I don&#039;t look at You Tube links without some explanation as to what they&#039;re about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it matters to anyone but me, but I don&#8217;t read posts of what Chat or Grok say, and I don&#8217;t look at You Tube links without some explanation as to what they&#8217;re about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TommyJay		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/30/open-thread-10-30-2025/#comment-2828094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TommyJay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=145073#comment-2828094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A company called 1X is almost ready to begin marketing at housekeeper robot named &quot;Neo.&quot;  Ha.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company called 1X is almost ready to begin marketing at housekeeper robot named &#8220;Neo.&#8221;  Ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
