<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ian Andre Roberts: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@  eeyore mood &#062; &quot;The agency said it does not check for citizenship.&quot;

One would assume that a background check would at least include determining that a claimed job or award or degree actually existed -- and ditto the employer, awarder, or school.

Apparently one would be wrong.

@ Watt in re the Powerline post: amazing the amount of background information that can be found by actually checking someone&#039;s background.
Especially the criminal charges that have nothing to do with citizenship status.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  eeyore mood &gt; &#8220;The agency said it does not check for citizenship.&#8221;</p>
<p>One would assume that a background check would at least include determining that a claimed job or award or degree actually existed &#8212; and ditto the employer, awarder, or school.</p>
<p>Apparently one would be wrong.</p>
<p>@ Watt in re the Powerline post: amazing the amount of background information that can be found by actually checking someone&#8217;s background.<br />
Especially the criminal charges that have nothing to do with citizenship status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 08:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ huxley &#062; &quot;Re: ID Frauds / Catch Me If You Can&quot;

Abagnale&#039;s opus was my first thought also.
Even if not a true story, his book and the movie were both brilliant works of the con man genre.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ huxley &gt; &#8220;Re: ID Frauds / Catch Me If You Can&#8221;</p>
<p>Abagnale&#8217;s opus was my first thought also.<br />
Even if not a true story, his book and the movie were both brilliant works of the con man genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AppleBetty		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppleBetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always assumed that my resume would be check, at the very least by my on-the-job performance (engineering), and if that was lacking, I would be fired.  And,  I assumed that if my resume wasn&#039;t scrupulously accurate, I would be fired, so I double-checked everything and listed everything, including the job in housekeeping.  Sigh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always assumed that my resume would be check, at the very least by my on-the-job performance (engineering), and if that was lacking, I would be fired.  And,  I assumed that if my resume wasn&#8217;t scrupulously accurate, I would be fired, so I double-checked everything and listed everything, including the job in housekeeping.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shadow		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’m retired now, but I would have not a scruple about lying on my
CV if it wasn’t going to be checked&quot;

Talking your way into a job, especially when the employer has a serious need to fill a position, is all too easy.  I&#039;ve done it three times in the past six years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m retired now, but I would have not a scruple about lying on my<br />
CV if it wasn’t going to be checked&#8221;</p>
<p>Talking your way into a job, especially when the employer has a serious need to fill a position, is all too easy.  I&#8217;ve done it three times in the past six years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnTyler		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andre Roberts is a member of the anointed class. 
That&#039;s all you need to know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andre Roberts is a member of the anointed class.<br />
That&#8217;s all you need to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Skip		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 10:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure can add to comments, probably no one wanted to see because DEI requires blinders.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure can add to comments, probably no one wanted to see because DEI requires blinders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cavendish		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cavendish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 10:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art Deco and Steph (both above) make reference to it, &quot;it&quot; being the stunning incompetence of just about every level of the Education Industrial Complex. One has to - very severely - question &quot;just what the #&#038;% is going on in the taxpayer-funded / supported dot edu business.&quot; 

Neo&#039;s post title, &lt;i&gt;Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus&lt;/i&gt; (“False in one thing, false in all things”) could easily be extended to &quot;Incompetent in One, Incompetent in All&quot; which seems to be the governing principle for so much of what is claimed to be &quot;education&quot; in America. Ian Andre Roberts is today&#039;s poster child for education industry malfeasance, but anyone who has kids in school - and I&#039;m including private schools as well as public - and has dealt with the ingrained bureaucracies the industry is founded upon and has so throughly embraced - has to wonder about everything else the Geniuses of Education are doing. 

&quot;Oh, but my kids&#039; school is great/terrific/etc., and Ms. Bradford/Ms. Jones/Mr. Smith is/are great teachers.&quot; &quot;Teachers of what?&quot; exactly, and how is that information delivered and the student performance improvement derived therefrom measured? 

I&#039;m firmly in the &quot;nuke it from orbit and rebuild from scratch on fresh ground&quot; camp on this. Too much money, and too many futures - including America&#039;s - are at stake to ccontinue to tolerate tghe substandArd peformance that has become the default setting for educatuion in America. The idea of a &quot;town school marm&quot; funded by the town council was appealing a couple centuries ago, and it probably worked pretty well in a one-room schoolhouse with a few dozen students of varying ages who would head back to the farm or ranch with roughly an 8th grade education (which, it must be pointed out, was often substantially more broad and contained much more detail and skill improvement than today&#039;s &quot;graduating&quot; high school seniors are capable of). 

So. anyone know just how many more Ian Andre Roberts there are out in Education Land? And, just what, exactly, those dot edu agencies, departments and boards - each of which would eagerly adopt another Ian Andre Roberts if offered the opportunity -  are teaching our kids, especially to what end and achievement level?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art Deco and Steph (both above) make reference to it, &#8220;it&#8221; being the stunning incompetence of just about every level of the Education Industrial Complex. One has to &#8211; very severely &#8211; question &#8220;just what the #&amp;% is going on in the taxpayer-funded / supported dot edu business.&#8221; </p>
<p>Neo&#8217;s post title, <i>Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus</i> (“False in one thing, false in all things”) could easily be extended to &#8220;Incompetent in One, Incompetent in All&#8221; which seems to be the governing principle for so much of what is claimed to be &#8220;education&#8221; in America. Ian Andre Roberts is today&#8217;s poster child for education industry malfeasance, but anyone who has kids in school &#8211; and I&#8217;m including private schools as well as public &#8211; and has dealt with the ingrained bureaucracies the industry is founded upon and has so throughly embraced &#8211; has to wonder about everything else the Geniuses of Education are doing. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, but my kids&#8217; school is great/terrific/etc., and Ms. Bradford/Ms. Jones/Mr. Smith is/are great teachers.&#8221; &#8220;Teachers of what?&#8221; exactly, and how is that information delivered and the student performance improvement derived therefrom measured? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m firmly in the &#8220;nuke it from orbit and rebuild from scratch on fresh ground&#8221; camp on this. Too much money, and too many futures &#8211; including America&#8217;s &#8211; are at stake to ccontinue to tolerate tghe substandArd peformance that has become the default setting for educatuion in America. The idea of a &#8220;town school marm&#8221; funded by the town council was appealing a couple centuries ago, and it probably worked pretty well in a one-room schoolhouse with a few dozen students of varying ages who would head back to the farm or ranch with roughly an 8th grade education (which, it must be pointed out, was often substantially more broad and contained much more detail and skill improvement than today&#8217;s &#8220;graduating&#8221; high school seniors are capable of). </p>
<p>So. anyone know just how many more Ian Andre Roberts there are out in Education Land? And, just what, exactly, those dot edu agencies, departments and boards &#8211; each of which would eagerly adopt another Ian Andre Roberts if offered the opportunity &#8211;  are teaching our kids, especially to what end and achievement level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 06:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My observation, over many years, is that people who bounce around from job to job every couple years are typically one step ahead of being exposed as a fraud.
Eventually it catches up with them.
DEI enables them to keep up the fraud longer.
Plus, those who were defrauded don&#039;t want to admit how stupid they are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My observation, over many years, is that people who bounce around from job to job every couple years are typically one step ahead of being exposed as a fraud.<br />
Eventually it catches up with them.<br />
DEI enables them to keep up the fraud longer.<br />
Plus, those who were defrauded don&#8217;t want to admit how stupid they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: William M. Klein		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William M. Klein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Multiply this by thousands and you will get the true damage of DEI hires. From government to medicine to the military to business we failed and continue to fail to hire and advance the best.  We will greatly suffer for this in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiply this by thousands and you will get the true damage of DEI hires. From government to medicine to the military to business we failed and continue to fail to hire and advance the best.  We will greatly suffer for this in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/10/03/ian-andre-roberts-falsus-in-uno-falsus-in-omnibus/#comment-2824727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=144397#comment-2824727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would seem that a prolonged search would have been necessary to find somebody with so many reasons not to be hired.
Of all the losers out there, none were loserish enough for the board.
To think this was an accident strains the imagination.   But....maybe it was an accident.
Or maybe it was an accident due to various requirements for consideration.  Within those requirements would only be losers.
Okay.  I&#039;m kind of spitballing here, but to have one guy checking so many DO NOT HIRE boxes, just one guy covering all the DO NOT HIRE bases....gets hired.
[Checks probability theory.]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that a prolonged search would have been necessary to find somebody with so many reasons not to be hired.<br />
Of all the losers out there, none were loserish enough for the board.<br />
To think this was an accident strains the imagination.   But&#8230;.maybe it was an accident.<br />
Or maybe it was an accident due to various requirements for consideration.  Within those requirements would only be losers.<br />
Okay.  I&#8217;m kind of spitballing here, but to have one guy checking so many DO NOT HIRE boxes, just one guy covering all the DO NOT HIRE bases&#8230;.gets hired.<br />
[Checks probability theory.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
