Article says it was an NBC commentator who was chased.

You’re right, my mistake. I thought she was NPR because I mostly know her from when I used to listen to Boston Public Radio on NPR and she was on all the time and I believe she guest hosts.(Yes I used to listen to NPR. Just trying to give them a chance to make their point.) Sorry, honest mistake.

The story by Ted Nordhaus that Hoyt brings attention to at Instapundit is very much worth reading, both for the information about “climate change” background and current status, and why its proponents seem to be stuck on supporting it, plus the process by he which eventually became disillusioned with the AGW cause he had enthusiastically supported in the past.
Not the least of his reasons were the inherent contradictions in the doom predictions, and their divergence from reality.
IOW, a scientist actually doing science.

https://www.breakthroughjournal.org/p/why-i-stopped-being-a-climate-catastrophist

People like [Judy Hoback] Miller [are] the “so-called ‘minor people’” — the secretaries, security guards, and other low-level employees who worked behind the scenes for the big players who were often the first to talk. Such people are rarely ideologues nor are they being paid enough [to subvert the truth or commit crimes].

Judy Miller helped break the Watergate scandel. Yes, some conspiracies are real or have actually happened. And this above quote always sounded like a perfectly reasonable difficulty in sustaining a large conspiracy. That is, it sounded reasonable until the last few election cycles and extreme TDS happened.

How many average Joe’s and Jane’s do you know who would happily engage in lower level corruption to cover up or facilitate a scheme to “get Trump” or damage his administration? And if some people engage in these activities and get caught, we’ve seen many of them get a slap on the wrist and are immediately cheered by their compatriots. I’m thinking of the lady who got caught voting multiple times in one election and was later cheered at some Dem confab.

Yes, but given the possibilities of going against the NARRATIVE(TM) in the Age of “Biden” did they have a choice?

IIRC it was a “cut bait” kind of thing.

“…Why I Stopped Being a Climate Catastrophist. And why so many climate pragmatists can’t quit catastrophism.”—
https://instapundit.com/738036/
H/T Sarah Hoyt, at Instapundit.

They will find a pretext and a hawaian judge

(Just asking…as Tucker Carlson might say)….
– – – – – – – – –
Back to getting mugged, this time by Reuters….

“Why Is Reuters Carrying Water for Hamas?
“Media organizations said there is ‘no evidence’ of systemic aid theft by Hamas. That reporting went viral. But it isn’t true.”—
https://www.thefp.com/p/why-is-reuters-carrying-water-for-hamas
H/T Powerline blog.