Not that such means hubris couldn’t be involved, just saying don’t underestimate political insurance.

True, but had the Dems had their way, he would be sitting in prison based on four different convictions.

He not only has a very strong appeals case on the conviction, but the voters saw through the phony conviction and re-elected him. Quite a statement against the jury’s verdict.

The justice system worked in spite of the malign malpractice by Bragg, James, Willis, and Smith. A lot of that is due to Trump’s excellent legal representation and his ability to hire them. IMO, it showed that our system of justice, imperfect as it is, is still better than most.

That the appeal on the Bragg case hasn’t been heard yet is more evidence of malign malpractice. YMMV.

It didn’t. He is a convicted felon. He just didn’t have to go to prison. New York perverted the law to get a felony conviction for something that is not a crime, using an extended statute of limitations by executive order.

And Trump’s still appealing it.

the crew around kennedy, largely organized the watergate subterfuge for reasons, we know subsequently how morally compromised he would become with the Soviets,

The failure of Durham was accepting a presumption of innocence to stop a thorough investigation. Like the one that never happened over Hillary’s illegal server, which likely was hacked & copied by China & Russia & maybe Mossad. It would be good if She was included in the conspiracy.

Congress should also increase the statute of limitations to 10 or 20 years for govt officials.

Brennan will likely be at least one scapegoat, but all of Obama’s lying govt criminals should be indicted and fully prosecuted so that all the evidence is presented in a court of law, with witnesses under oath.

The court verdict is less important than the evidence for use in campaigns, including to convince more independents that the Dems & media were lying. Over and over again. It might even create a cascade of acknowledgment that the Dems were lying, tho the “Yes, Biden is semi-senile, but the govt was lying to us, too” will also be used.

Dems who believe liars are gullible, and should be laughed at. Repeatedly.

The remainder would be to get our craven and partisan press corps to cover that story truthfully: an outgoing president instructed the intelligence services of which he was still in charge to create a blatantly false – 180 degrees from what he knew was the truth – pretext for:

(1) surveillance of the incoming administration’s personnel including the new president

(2) poisoning the new president’s ability to staff his administration by prosecuting and threatening prosecution of those who had already signed on

(3) interfering with the new president’s ability to conduct foreign policy by convincing the American public – and Congress! – that any negotiations he entered into with Russia would be corrupt self-dealing

(4) laying the groundwork for a complete roadblock of everything the new administration might try to accomplish

(5) materially damaging – let’s be real; attempting to destroy – a man’s reputation and those of his surrogates

– and now claims that he did all of that as part of his official role as Chief Executive. Serving whom?

But there is another factor implied in her statement that “The left is made up the morally superior, revolutionary, loud and proud nags.” I think they also wanted to leave a record for future generations so that history would appreciate how clever and how moral they had been. It never entered their minds that they might be neither.