“…House DOGE Subcommittee Exposes “Public Funds, Private Agendas: NGOs Gone Wild” ‘—
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-live-house-doge-subcommittee-exposes-public-funds-private-agendas-ngos-gone-wild

This “fact” permits the Media to lie about them; in fact it permits the Media to lie about everything.

Alas, no across-the-board truth telling, accuracy or clarity will be visible on the horizon any time soon.

We’ll just hafta continue reading between the lines (and pixels).

BEGIN PASTE

The Gell-Mann amnesia effect is a cognitive bias describing the tendency of individuals to critically assess media reports in a domain they are knowledgeable about, yet continue to trust reporting in other areas despite recognizing similar potential inaccuracies.

The concept was coined by novelist Michael Crichton in a 2002 speech, naming it after Murray Gell-Mann, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist with whom he had discussed the phenomenon.

END PASTE

Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect

— — — — — —

Michael Crichton describes the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect as follows:

BEGIN PASTE

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s [Murray Gell-Mann’s] case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I’d point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all. But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn’t. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia.

END PASTE

— Michael Crichton, “Why Speculate?” (2002)

Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20070714204136/http://www.michaelcrichton.net/speech-whyspeculate.html

Unfortunately, I believe that the public’s memory is generally very short lived, and that, in short order, most of them will be back believing whatever these professional liars are feeding them.

Everything I’ve read supports this.

I would go farther and say that it was Joe Biden’s eff-you to Obama, Pelosi et al. for the coup.

These are not good people.

There should be jailings and hangings for this kind of subversion and treason.