Reading about Gerber also pointed me to a great archive of radio & tv programs, the Cavalcade of America series sponsored by DuPont, which ran from 1935-1957.

https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/74024.html

or more summary version from 2025: https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/quantifying-and-remedying-overcriminalization-federal-law

The issue in Trump’s EO is to ensure regulations with criminal penalties [rather than civil ones?] also are read and interpreted to incorporate the legal concept of means rea or “intent to do harm” as part of charging someone with a crime. Some regulations and legislation apparently do not include that common sense criteria in defining what is a crime. Thus someone can be charged for doing something criminal even though they did not know it was a crime and did not intend to commit a crime. Clearly, excessive numbers of situations like that make a joke of the rule of law, or worse.
But as with all EO’s, really Congress needs to clean this mess up that they created via loose or vague or arbitrary or capricious legislative language.

I wrote about Willow Run and the attempt to save the plant as a museum here:

https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/41732.html

Qatar signs an agreement with Boeing to purchase 160 aircraft — the largest widebody aircraft order in the American company’s history

Wikipedia

On 1 August 2017, Defense One reported that in an effort to pay less for the replacement program, the USAF entered into a contract to purchase two 747-8 Intercontinental (747-8I) jets from Boeing, which had originally been ordered in 2011 by Transaero, a Russian airline. Before they could be delivered, Transaero filed for bankruptcy and was closed down; the two aircraft were stored at Southern California Logistics Airport in the Mojave Desert to prevent corrosion. On 27 February 2018, the White House announced a US$3.9 billion (~$4.66 billion in 2023) agreement with Boeing to modify the two unsold 747-8s to replace the VC-25As. The new aircraft is to be designated VC-25B.

The birthright case Is also yuge and not a slamdunk as the Left claims.

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Nationwide Injunctions in Trump v. CASA

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday in a case that could have major implications for the future of executive authority and the use of nationwide injunctions by federal district courts.

The consolidated case, Trump v. CASA, centers on President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children born in the United States to illegal immigrants—a policy blocked by multiple lower courts.

Three federal district judges issued nationwide injunctions that prevented the Trump administration from implementing the order, despite the executive branch’s longstanding constitutional authority over immigration matters.

The high court is now being asked to consider whether such sweeping judicial actions overstep the proper role of the courts.

https://www.lifezette.com/2025/05/supreme-court-to-hear-challenge-to-nationwide-injunctions-in-trump-v-casa/

But no, it refers to Biden’s original sin in choosing to run again.

This seems to be the limited hang-out route Democrats and media have chosen to rationalize their loss in 2024.

That’s right. Democrats would have had 2024 sewn up except for that senile fool, Joe Biden.