Comments on: India avenges Daniel Pearl

By: Cappy

Cappy — Sun, 11 May 2025 13:36:31 +0000

Jai Hind!

By: Kate

Kate — Sat, 10 May 2025 13:25:06 +0000

Trump announces full and immediate ceasefire between India and Pakistan.

https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2025/05/10/trump-announces-full-and-immediate-ceasefire-between-india-and-pakistan/

By: miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Sat, 10 May 2025 13:00:40 +0000

international law is a convenient fiction, often to be used as a club, against one party or another,

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us

By: Richard Aubrey

Richard Aubrey — Sat, 10 May 2025 12:05:30 +0000

I’ve heard it so many times I figured there must be a definition someplace. Can’t find one.
It’s the “Westphalian model”. That is, the accumulation of legal and cultural expectations of the responsibilities of a sovereign nation, and its supposed freedom from other states’ Big Ideas. These supposedly stemmed from the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, ending the Thirty Years War. And have become more solidified in international law and citizens’ expectations.
I suppose it works, in a way.
But when we have non-state actors, there’s a problem. With the possible exception of the Gaza–depending on your definition–and Antarctica, every dry spot on the planet is owned by a sovereign nation.
So non-state actors are aways within sovereign nations about whom we have the Westphalian model expectations. Now what?
Does Pakistan have some, none, or a lot of responsibility for the terrorists within its borders? This presumes they don’t love them some terrorists.
Look at, say, Mauretania. There’s a lot of not-there there and if terrorists set up a base and somebody says you should do something, they might say, there’s not a road within a hundred miles of the place and we only own four helicopters. So other states are allowed….what, exactly?
Of they might say we have those terrorists’ family and friends all over the capital and we can’t afford to annoy them. Now….what, exactly?
Or they could say, those are good folks and what they do is none of your business so butt out. Then what…exactly?
Do we “invade” a sovereign nation? What does that nation do, is expected to do, considering it’s being invaded?
I say this because I recall various arguments about this when the US was going after Al Quaeda in Afghanistan.

The former all presumes the terrorists aren’t connected to the government, however tenouosly.

Pakistan’s response seems to be as if their very own stuff, people and infrastructure, has been hit. So how does this fit the Westphalian model?

Do we abandon it altogether?

By: TJ

TJ — Fri, 09 May 2025 22:24:47 +0000

Look at Islam’s bloody borders and expulsion of the l conquered.

How long will the Left-terrorist alliance and the Iron Curtain of denial continue ruling over us?

By: miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Thu, 08 May 2025 22:31:06 +0000

I was saying the account by Marianne, who they based on the film, suggests that, the film indicates that KSM had admitted his part in the deed, even though omar saeed sheikh, was the one who kidnapped him, as the story goes, they do seem very anxious to claim credit like a perverse typeofparticipation trophy

so dalia maghrabi, the one who committed that massacre in 1978, was mawdawis pinup
for lack of a better phrase, why did they do it, to stop further peace talks with israel, that is their logic,

so it’s left to india to take care of the business, and well they are out of that brand of pager
(I’m sure they have others)

By: miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Thu, 08 May 2025 22:14:46 +0000

dhimmi press, I remember Helen Thomas cried when Fadlallah passed, he was the inspiration leader for Hezbollah, like the grand poobah of the water buffalo, for the longest time I think Mubarak Gilani was the one who set up, Daniel Pearl, it appears not to have been true, at least not most directly, it helps when you are a nuclear power, they largely leave you alone,

By: Don

Don — Thu, 08 May 2025 22:06:26 +0000

Islam’s borders with the rest of the world tends to be where a lot of bloodshed occurs.

By: Skip

Skip — Thu, 08 May 2025 21:58:12 +0000

Read history on Islam’s fighting and trying to overtake India for centuries. Millions have been killed through the ages.

By: Gringo

Gringo — Thu, 08 May 2025 21:53:18 +0000

I go on to add that th [sic] who killed Pearl want killing Jews to be a worldwide effort. While our benighted MSM does its best to conceal that. Consider a NYT article about the death of Hezbollah honcho Nasrallah. Protesters Mourn Nasrallah’s Death Around the World

Mr. Nasrallah was opposed to Israel, which he called “the Zionist entity,” and maintained that there should be one Palestine with equality for Muslims, Jews and Christians.

For comparison, here is an article that directly quotes Nasrallah. Hassan Nasrallah: In His Own Words(2006)

If they (Jews) all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide. (Daily Star, Oct. 23, 2002)

Doesn't sound at all like the "Can't we all live together in equality?" narrative the the NYT claimed for Nasrallah. Sounds more like me to a goal of genocide, which is doubly ironic given that the Hamasniks and Hezbollahniks claim that Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza. What Hamasniks want done to Israelis, they accuse Israelis of doing. The article pointed out other tolerant, peaceful utterances from Chairman Nasrallah.

Nasrallah also incoroporates anti-Semitic rhetoric in speeches. For example, he has characterized Jews as the “grandsons of apes and pigs” and “Allah’s most cowardly and greedy creatures.” (MEMRI: Al- Manar, Feb. 3, 2006) Despite his anti-Semitic invective, there are few references to this in the mainstream media.

Very few references.