This embedded tweet aptly summarizes the MO of the Left.
https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot-2025-04-15-at-22.27.1.jpg?itok=37DC7FP0

I agree with Art Deco on their misperception about their numbers, and Mitchell Strand may well have a point: “This article is coded for Muslims, who think dogs are unclean.”

As usual, Not the Bee for the win.
https://notthebee.com/article/are-liberals-going-to-really-come-after-pets-next
“Please, liberals, I’m begging you, do us all a favor and come after people’s dogs. They’re destroying “Mother Earth,” and they exist in 44% of American homes.
I guarantee this will make you even more popular than you already are in the next election!”

If keying the Teslas bought by correct-thinking environmentally-woke Democrats (which generates responses like the following) gets a negative reaction from their fellow-travelers (and it has), I can only imagine the red-pilled avalanche that will be caused by attacking their fur-babies.
(Did I get all the jargon in there?)
https://notthebee.com/article/the-daily-shows-live-audience-applauds-acts-of-terrorism-against-tesla-owners

We have laws in Slovakia requiring owners to pick up their dogs’ poop, and maybe 80% do. The law can help with enforcement of a norm, but real enforcement punishment is needed, sometimes.

Most Dems, and intn’l “Liberals”, like to talk about laws, but not enforcement. Real law is the law or norms that is enforced, like for whites to not use the n-word.

*I would often be reading a newspaper article and would have to open the shitty paper to finish the article, the wrap up the stinky poop again. A lot the news I read was, literally, shitty.

Sure thing! I’m in favor of that. 🙂

If nothing else- it would be entertaining, if not laughable, to see these “experts”, with their 10-year-old-kid’s-type grasp of science, + [their pencil-pushing-bodies or their desk-jockey-bodies]- go out with their weapons, and try to “go to war” with the crocodiles + kangaroos.

Talking about science is talking about science, but- an angry, fighting kangaroo would beat the heck out of the average, sedentary, reporter guy. 😀

Perhaps the Aussie authors of the article can start by killing all the kangaroos in Australia; you know, to gain experience in the skill of hunting.

Then, they can move onto eliminating all the crocodiles there to gain hunting experience in a watery environment. And just imagine all the poo the Crocs dump into their watery abodes, polluting those pristine rivers down under.

Yep, Australia would be a good place for the authors to begin saving the planet.
Then they can move onto the east coast of the USA and rid the world of pesky – and sometimes dangerous – black bears.

Here’s an idea; eliminate all wildlife which certainly would reduce enviro impacts and polluting waterways and certainly would reduce carbon emissions.

I will venture to guess that for every dog on earth, there are at least two different “wildlife” animals. So if animals – tamed or otherwise – contribute to destroying the earth, it’s clear that the “wild” animals are far worse for the planet then domesticated dogs.
So, where can one buy some rhino horns or elephant tusks??