I think that a case to clarify this issue needs to make its way to the Supreme Court.

Similarly, cases clarifying the role and the extent of the jurisdiction and powers of lower courts, vis-a-vis the President, in his capacity as Chief Executive, need to very urgently be presented to the Supreme Court for it’s decision.

You just can’t have some lower court judge, with limited geographical jurisdiction, issuing orders which are supposedly nationwide in their application, nor can you have such subordinate members of the judicial branch thinking that they can bind/prevent the Chief Executive from carrying out his Constitutionally mandated duties.

The Powerline post makes clear what a lot of articles on the government-NGO connections skip over.

Governments at all levels, in recent years, have taken to outsourcing even basic functions to nonprofits. Call it the “government-nonprofit industrial complex.”

The benefits for all involved include evading both legislative accountability and civil-service limits on executive-level pay. At the lower end, too, nonprofits can utilize volunteer and low-wage labor not available to a government agency performing that exact same function.

When it comes to scrutiny in government contracts, for-profit companies, who are just in it to make a buck, are rightfully treated with skepticism when being vetted. But nonprofits are given the benefit of the doubt, assumed to be in it for all the right reasons.

No one ever points out that the non-profits don’t make a profit because they have no products to sell, and their income from “donations” all goes to their own salaries and “expenses” which get less scrutiny than a third-grader’s lemonade stand.

And all the right (correct) reasons are presumed by the public to be “charity and love” while in fact they are “ideological conformity to the left’s agenda.”

https://x.com/JMichaelWaller/status/1901164624411549895

‘A “COMPLEX” TOO COMPLEX’—
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/03/a-complex-too-complex.php

File under: The [Automatic] Pen is mightier than the sword…

FPV Drones, Mortars, Arty, and Glide Bombs, counter the glide bombs and Russian advances will cease (IMO)

Ukraine Veteran about Mortars, Artillery & Gliding Bombs
– Military History not Visualized

Timestamps

00:00 Teaser
00:11 Intro
00:40 How the FPV Drones held Ukraine to held back the Russians
02:52 Kill Chain is shorter & Mortars
04:13 Artillery vs Drones
04:37 Gliding Bombs
06:02 Regular Air Strike vs Gliding Bombs

European Rearmament – The ReArm Europe Plan & the Future of U.S. Weapon Sales – Perun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0AOusajGsU

No timestamps, his synopsis:

The Russian invasion of Ukraine kicked off a significant increase in military spending across NATO with the vast majority of NATO members hitting their spending targets by 2024.

The diplomatic fissures with the United States in 2025 however, have prompted an even more dramatic response and many allies now seem to be prioritising greater independence from the U.S. and U.S. products alongside the goal of greater military readiness.

With the EU introducing the ReArm Europe plan, Germany moving to exempt most defence spending from debt restrictions and many alliance members now planning defence ramp-ups, today we look at some of those plans.

This episode covers a few of the initiatives and efforts we’ve seen announced so far, what they could achieve, what the dynamics of alliance members attempting to reduce their often long-running reliance on U.S. arms and equipment.