<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[P.S.  Realistically, our society&#039;s economic system has changed since the 70s in ways which make marrying and starting a family at 24 a lot less doable and attractive than it was 50 plus years ago. 

Mentalities, the general tenor of our times, have also changed as well, with ideas like &quot;toxic masculinity,&quot; &quot;boss girls,&quot; and &quot;living your best life&quot; floating around, and permeating, perhaps even dominating and directing a lot of young people&#039;s thoughts, apparently making marrying young and starting a family a lot less expected and palatable than it once was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  Realistically, our society&#8217;s economic system has changed since the 70s in ways which make marrying and starting a family at 24 a lot less doable and attractive than it was 50 plus years ago. </p>
<p>Mentalities, the general tenor of our times, have also changed as well, with ideas like &#8220;toxic masculinity,&#8221; &#8220;boss girls,&#8221; and &#8220;living your best life&#8221; floating around, and permeating, perhaps even dominating and directing a lot of young people&#8217;s thoughts, apparently making marrying young and starting a family a lot less expected and palatable than it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In view of our ongoing general population decline— births dropping below replacement rates— in virtually every country in the West, including the U.S., the Trump Administration needs to come up with a plan to stimulate early family formations, and to encourage many more children to be born by those young families.

A talk on demographics I referred to here concluded that population decline was caused by the average age of having a child increasing from 24 to 35, and that those 35 year olds are nowhere near as vital as 24 year olds, and tend not to have as many children, or perhaps no children after all.

Governments all over the world have tried to get their citizens to have more children with no real success, so this is a hard thing to accomplish, and mere monetary incentives apparently won’t do it.

So, apparently some sort of wide ranging program of all sorts of benefits will have to be created to stimulate such births.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In view of our ongoing general population decline— births dropping below replacement rates— in virtually every country in the West, including the U.S., the Trump Administration needs to come up with a plan to stimulate early family formations, and to encourage many more children to be born by those young families.</p>
<p>A talk on demographics I referred to here concluded that population decline was caused by the average age of having a child increasing from 24 to 35, and that those 35 year olds are nowhere near as vital as 24 year olds, and tend not to have as many children, or perhaps no children after all.</p>
<p>Governments all over the world have tried to get their citizens to have more children with no real success, so this is a hard thing to accomplish, and mere monetary incentives apparently won’t do it.</p>
<p>So, apparently some sort of wide ranging program of all sorts of benefits will have to be created to stimulate such births.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[there is a distinction between classical liberalism, which was the default setting not only in the Northern Hemisphere but in sections of the South, the regimes in Mexico and Argentina, to cite two examples, and the Conservative regimes of Santa Ana, and Roca, on the other end,

they have tried demand reduction regimes in Switzerland and the Netherlands, they had to discontinue them, they were largely influenced by Soros networks,
including his Johnny Appleseed, Ethan Nadelman,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a distinction between classical liberalism, which was the default setting not only in the Northern Hemisphere but in sections of the South, the regimes in Mexico and Argentina, to cite two examples, and the Conservative regimes of Santa Ana, and Roca, on the other end,</p>
<p>they have tried demand reduction regimes in Switzerland and the Netherlands, they had to discontinue them, they were largely influenced by Soros networks,<br />
including his Johnny Appleseed, Ethan Nadelman,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: art deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[art deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;This discussion illustrates the dangers of libertarianism carried too far. Some limits are necessary. The key is deciding where the line is, and that’s often hard.&lt;/i&gt;
==
There&#039;s a reason Mr. Sailer has christened libertarianism  &#039;applied autism&#039;.  (He was doubtlessly thinking of Bryan Caplan).
==
I used to follow a Catholic blogger who had once been employed by a libertarian policy shop.  He said he began to walk away from the movement when he realized that the leading lights of libertarianism were all childless.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This discussion illustrates the dangers of libertarianism carried too far. Some limits are necessary. The key is deciding where the line is, and that’s often hard.</i><br />
==<br />
There&#8217;s a reason Mr. Sailer has christened libertarianism  &#8216;applied autism&#8217;.  (He was doubtlessly thinking of Bryan Caplan).<br />
==<br />
I used to follow a Catholic blogger who had once been employed by a libertarian policy shop.  He said he began to walk away from the movement when he realized that the leading lights of libertarianism were all childless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am not clear about what the status of someone who &quot;retires&quot; or resigns a government position is, with regard to whatever they did as a government  employee.  

Doss their resignation/retirement insulate them somewhat from being hauled before Congress to testify, and to be charged with whatever crimes they might have committed as government employees?

Is seems that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not clear about what the status of someone who &#8220;retires&#8221; or resigns a government position is, with regard to whatever they did as a government  employee.  </p>
<p>Doss their resignation/retirement insulate them somewhat from being hauled before Congress to testify, and to be charged with whatever crimes they might have committed as government employees?</p>
<p>Is seems that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I see that  President Trump has appointed Dan Bongino as the new Deputy Director of the FBI.

While those on the Left are trying to dismiss Bongino as just a podcaster, he has decades of experience, first, as a NYC policeman and, then,  as a Secret Service agent, he&#039;s been around the block a few times, he knows Washington, the players and their games, is well-informed, probably knows where a lot of the bodies are buried, and has a realistic, hard-charging, no-nonsense attitude.
 
I expect that many leftist/Obama-Biden/rogue FBI agents are terrified of the combination of Kash Patel as Director and Dan Bongino as Deputy Director .

I&#039;m expecting great things from the triumvirate of Pam Bondi as head of the Department of Justice, and  Kash Patel and Dan Bongino  at the  FBI.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that  President Trump has appointed Dan Bongino as the new Deputy Director of the FBI.</p>
<p>While those on the Left are trying to dismiss Bongino as just a podcaster, he has decades of experience, first, as a NYC policeman and, then,  as a Secret Service agent, he&#8217;s been around the block a few times, he knows Washington, the players and their games, is well-informed, probably knows where a lot of the bodies are buried, and has a realistic, hard-charging, no-nonsense attitude.</p>
<p>I expect that many leftist/Obama-Biden/rogue FBI agents are terrified of the combination of Kash Patel as Director and Dan Bongino as Deputy Director .</p>
<p>I&#8217;m expecting great things from the triumvirate of Pam Bondi as head of the Department of Justice, and  Kash Patel and Dan Bongino  at the  FBI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This discussion illustrates the dangers of libertarianism carried too far. Some limits are necessary. The key is deciding where the line is, and that&#039;s often hard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion illustrates the dangers of libertarianism carried too far. Some limits are necessary. The key is deciding where the line is, and that&#8217;s often hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Needle and The Damage Done&quot;

Not rocket surgery, no matter how much or for how long the reality is denied.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Needle and The Damage Done&#8221;</p>
<p>Not rocket surgery, no matter how much or for how long the reality is denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karmi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The legal maxim actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea means &quot;&lt;b&gt;an act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty intent&lt;/b&gt;&quot;. It&#039;s a fundamental principle of criminal law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course the &#039;&lt;i&gt;Lack of Morality&lt;/i&gt;&#039; GOP party prefers to twist Law &#039;n Facts to suit their &quot;species of violence.&quot; 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea is a Latin phrase that emphasizes that a guilty state of mind, or mens rea, must accompany an action to establish guilt. In other words, the act itself isn&#039;t enough to establish guilt.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

However, the &#039;&lt;i&gt;Lack of Morality&lt;/i&gt;&#039; GOP party would rather ignore even the Declaration of Independence when it suits their &quot;species of violence.&quot;: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the &lt;b&gt;pursuit of Happiness&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Brian E
&lt;blockquote&gt;Addictive drugs harm everyone the person comes into contact with. That goes for other vices as well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Right, ignore one&#039;s unalienable Rights to &#039;&lt;i&gt;the pursuit of Happiness&lt;/i&gt;&#039; - ignore that same one&#039;s lack of &#039;&lt;i&gt;criminal intent&lt;/i&gt;&#039; and then twist the Law to suit your evil beliefs. Focus on your beliefs and the imaginary &quot;harm&quot; that &lt;b&gt;maybe&lt;/b&gt; causes &quot;harm&quot; to &quot;everyone the person comes into contact with.&quot; Then use the power of *&lt;b&gt;BIG&lt;/b&gt;* Government to enforce your evil beliefs. That sounds worse than Lawfare.

Real *&lt;b&gt;HARM&lt;/b&gt;* comes in making such Vices illegal—creating unjust Laws that turn innocent people into criminals, and not allowing them their &lt;b&gt;pursuit of Happiness&lt;/b&gt;. Creating underground economies that go untaxed, etc. Create unjust Vice Laws that have historically been proven unenforceable - adding to massive costs for the American Taxpayer, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The legal maxim actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea means &#8220;<b>an act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty intent</b>&#8220;. It&#8217;s a fundamental principle of criminal law.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course the &#8216;<i>Lack of Morality</i>&#8216; GOP party prefers to twist Law &#8216;n Facts to suit their &#8220;species of violence.&#8221; </p>
<blockquote><p>Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea is a Latin phrase that emphasizes that a guilty state of mind, or mens rea, must accompany an action to establish guilt. In other words, the act itself isn&#8217;t enough to establish guilt.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, the &#8216;<i>Lack of Morality</i>&#8216; GOP party would rather ignore even the Declaration of Independence when it suits their &#8220;species of violence.&#8221;: </p>
<blockquote><p>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the <b>pursuit of Happiness</b>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Brian E</p>
<blockquote><p>Addictive drugs harm everyone the person comes into contact with. That goes for other vices as well.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, ignore one&#8217;s unalienable Rights to &#8216;<i>the pursuit of Happiness</i>&#8216; &#8211; ignore that same one&#8217;s lack of &#8216;<i>criminal intent</i>&#8216; and then twist the Law to suit your evil beliefs. Focus on your beliefs and the imaginary &#8220;harm&#8221; that <b>maybe</b> causes &#8220;harm&#8221; to &#8220;everyone the person comes into contact with.&#8221; Then use the power of *<b>BIG</b>* Government to enforce your evil beliefs. That sounds worse than Lawfare.</p>
<p>Real *<b>HARM</b>* comes in making such Vices illegal—creating unjust Laws that turn innocent people into criminals, and not allowing them their <b>pursuit of Happiness</b>. Creating underground economies that go untaxed, etc. Create unjust Vice Laws that have historically been proven unenforceable &#8211; adding to massive costs for the American Taxpayer, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian E		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/02/22/roundup-140/#comment-2789859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=140212#comment-2789859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karmi, you incorrectly vices as &lt;b&gt;VICES are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property.&lt;/b&gt;

But it&#039;s far from that. Addictive drugs harm everyone the person comes into contact with. That goes for other vices as well.

We treat the individual user trapped in their addiction differently than the manufacturer/distributor/seller that profits on other peoples weakness.

Many of the homeless in our town are drug addicts. For some reason it&#039;s considered more moral/humane to install a Narcan dispenser in the public library than it is to help the person/involuntary incarceration to break the addiction.

Yes the recidivism is high because it&#039;s very hard to diagnose the internal pain/emotional trauma that makes living in a stupor preferable to living life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karmi, you incorrectly vices as <b>VICES are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property.</b></p>
<p>But it&#8217;s far from that. Addictive drugs harm everyone the person comes into contact with. That goes for other vices as well.</p>
<p>We treat the individual user trapped in their addiction differently than the manufacturer/distributor/seller that profits on other peoples weakness.</p>
<p>Many of the homeless in our town are drug addicts. For some reason it&#8217;s considered more moral/humane to install a Narcan dispenser in the public library than it is to help the person/involuntary incarceration to break the addiction.</p>
<p>Yes the recidivism is high because it&#8217;s very hard to diagnose the internal pain/emotional trauma that makes living in a stupor preferable to living life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
