Comments on: RFK Jr. confirmed

By: Shadow

Shadow — Sat, 15 Feb 2025 16:47:30 +0000

The fact that we had a presidential candidate this past election cycle, who is now in an influential position in government, at least talking about the chronic disease epidemic AND how that was a driving force behind COVID-19 deaths, was nothing short of miraculous to me. We need people like RFK Jr. right now. He’s part and parcel of the extreme, sweeping change we need to make in the federal government. He’s certainly going to expose a great deal of the lies and corruption that have been going on in the pharmaceutical, food, and agricultural industries, and anyone who isn’t evil will be glad in the long run.

Do you listen to Dark Horse at all (Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying)? What they’ve had to say lately might make you reconsider some of your opinions on RFK Jr. Specific episodes I recommend are #256 “Follow the White Rabbit(s)” and #263 “A Germ of Truth.”

By: The Other Chuck

The Other Chuck — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 23:41:53 +0000

Duh, RFK, Jr…

By: The Other Chuck

The Other Chuck — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:20:05 +0000

Sharon W, yes JFK Jr’s book was a difficult read and not just because of the voluminous footnotes. His revelations about Fauci and AZT were extremely disturbing to me because of the many friends who took it to no avail and died horrible deaths. I had friends who lived in death houses waiting their turn, then attended funeral after funeral over a 5 year period in the mid 80s. We looked at Fauci as a savior when it turns out he was a monster.
If Kennedy is in error about vaccines, the possibility of inert ingredients in them causing autism, open research will prove him wrong. If he’s in error it could be something as simple as, correlation does not prove causation. It’s more likely that a number factors are leading to the increase, including mis-diagnosis.

By: Turtler

Turtler — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 21:00:20 +0000

Not going to lie, RFK has never been my favorite candidate among Trump’s retinue, but he has his points. Moreover he doesn’t need to be my favorite man in history but do a job within the limits of the law and President. We’ll see how it goes.

By: Mattsky

Mattsky — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:31:55 +0000

I’ve always thought he was a kook and a useful kook during the election. I hope I’m wrong about him.

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:33:44 +0000

When the prevailing Democrats say “science” or “environment” or “health” or “protection of children” you can be assured it represents the opposite.

And THAT—unfortunately—is “all ye’ need to know”….

If the Democrats, and the people they have seduced to support them, have persuaded me of anything it is precisely THAT.

“Unfortunately”, because 1) it is NOT an ideal situation for the country to be in; and 2) because those crafty, hateful, power-hungry imbeciles may, at times, stumble upon truth—even if accidentally or unintentionally—which complicates matters, SINCE IT MEANS means that EVERYONE will have to develop Soviet-type, laser-like abilities to read/hear/see “between the lines”, as it were, which I don’t believe is possible for most in the West.

(OTOH, if the venal, insane—endless—lying persists, even Westerners may EVOLVE to develop such critical—in all senses—capabilities…)

File under: The skeptical skeptic…

By: Sharon W

Sharon W — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 05:58:08 +0000

If you want to get a read on RFK Jr., I recommend listening to his interview with Joe Rogan.

By: Sharon W

Sharon W — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 05:55:33 +0000

I am very happy that he was chosen by Trump and confirmed. I was very biased against him up until the Pandemic. I formerly was a big-pharma defender. I listened to his “debate” with Dershowitz and I found out things regarding the science and inproper research regarding vaccines that shocked me. His book on Fauci was a difficult read exposing horrible actions advanced by our government. I could barely get through it. The Democrat pushback against him is indicative of the truth. They supported Fauci (“the Science”) and rejected RFK Jr., even the Kennedy family. When the prevailing Democrats say “science” or “environment” or “health” or “protection of children” you can be assured it represents the opposite.

By: Niketas Choniates

Niketas Choniates — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 02:50:10 +0000

LXE has the right of it. Because the human body is very complex, sometimes small amounts of substances have a very large effect. Immunization is predicated on this. Some substances need very large doses to cause a negative effect (table salt) and some only need a very small amount (cyanide).

An “inactive” ingredient just means that it doesn’t contribute to the intended effect, not that it does nothing at all. For example, if you read a NyQuil bottle there are three active ingredients listed. Alcohol is listed as an INactive ingredient, but it’s not as though alcohol has no effect on the body. It’s just “inactive” from the perspective of what NyQuil is intended to treat.

I don’t think the connection between autism and MMR vaccines has been established, but if there were one, it might be because one of the “inactive” ingredients has an unintended and not-understood effect, and so no one could just handwave away the size of the dose and the “inactivity” of that ingredient as reasons to discount that possibility.

There is a lot more generally accepted medicine unsupported by good standards of evidence than most people realize, and not everything doctors do went through controlled studies. For example, ten years ago I was given a silver cream to treat a burn, but there never was good evidence from controlled studies that it works better than anything it was ever compared with. It is just a traditional medicine.

By: Kate

Kate — Fri, 14 Feb 2025 02:05:59 +0000

Yes, LXE, but in traditional vaccines the “small substance” which makes the difference is the killed or inactive virus which triggers the immune response. RFK Jr. had argued that it was an inactive ingredient which made children be autistic, and that seems not to be valid, or at least it has not been convincingly proved to be valid. Anyhow, he said in the hearings that he would not change the recommended schedule of childhood vaccinations. We’ll see.