<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: And about the military	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:46:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Niketas Choniates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Chases Eagles:&lt;i&gt;I believe ICBMs are stellar inertial.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, because inertial navigation has to be checked against a second form of navigation. Submarine-launched ICBMs, unlike land-launched ICBMs, cannot use their launch point as an external reference, because the sub&#039;s position is not known accurately enough (at least not by the missile, the subs of course periodically use a second method to correct their inertial positions to whatever precision they find sufficient). I don&#039;t know if different ICBMs have different navigation systems but the sub-launched ones at least use stars for external reference.

Of course the larger the missile payload, the less important it is to be accurate within meters....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chases Eagles:<i>I believe ICBMs are stellar inertial.</i></p>
<p>Yes, because inertial navigation has to be checked against a second form of navigation. Submarine-launched ICBMs, unlike land-launched ICBMs, cannot use their launch point as an external reference, because the sub&#8217;s position is not known accurately enough (at least not by the missile, the subs of course periodically use a second method to correct their inertial positions to whatever precision they find sufficient). I don&#8217;t know if different ICBMs have different navigation systems but the sub-launched ones at least use stars for external reference.</p>
<p>Of course the larger the missile payload, the less important it is to be accurate within meters&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AesopFan:

DEI is fairly recent, but affirmative action is much older and a less extreme form of the same thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AesopFan:</p>
<p>DEI is fairly recent, but affirmative action is much older and a less extreme form of the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chases Eagles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chases Eagles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 17:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Should be pretty easy to add a celestial nav device. After all spacecraft don’t use GPS. Of course we once chased our own rocket plume. Oops. I believe ICBMs are stellar inertial.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be pretty easy to add a celestial nav device. After all spacecraft don’t use GPS. Of course we once chased our own rocket plume. Oops. I believe ICBMs are stellar inertial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are things called Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), submarines can&#039;t use GPS, IIRC, without coming up near surface to put up an 
antenna .

If INS is small enough and reliable enough for a boomer or attack sub I would guess it would fit and be good enough for an aircraft carrier.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are things called Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), submarines can&#8217;t use GPS, IIRC, without coming up near surface to put up an<br />
antenna .</p>
<p>If INS is small enough and reliable enough for a boomer or attack sub I would guess it would fit and be good enough for an aircraft carrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anne		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sometime during the past 20 years the US Naval Academy dropped the requirement for Celestial Navigation.  That is to say for about five years the leadership of every ship out on the seas accepted that they only needed the necessary information provided by satellites!  IOW  if an aircraft carrier, for some &quot;unforeseen&quot; reason lost its satellite connections the ship would be dead in the water!  That inevitability was accepted by the top command level !!

It was not until a group of retired Navy people got together and forced the Naval Academy to reinstate the Celestial Navigation requirement that the Academy saw the light of day!  

It would be interesting if someone here could get the history of that event from the academy and make it available to the President so that he has some backup power!  I remember reading the story in the press and the significance of that event had been watered down! The error may have already been corrected but the cause (source) of the error may still be in  place !   Help the President do his job by providing factual information regarding educational practices in the services! 

Bottom line here is to go back to the K-12 groups and start cleaning up that mess!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime during the past 20 years the US Naval Academy dropped the requirement for Celestial Navigation.  That is to say for about five years the leadership of every ship out on the seas accepted that they only needed the necessary information provided by satellites!  IOW  if an aircraft carrier, for some &#8220;unforeseen&#8221; reason lost its satellite connections the ship would be dead in the water!  That inevitability was accepted by the top command level !!</p>
<p>It was not until a group of retired Navy people got together and forced the Naval Academy to reinstate the Celestial Navigation requirement that the Academy saw the light of day!  </p>
<p>It would be interesting if someone here could get the history of that event from the academy and make it available to the President so that he has some backup power!  I remember reading the story in the press and the significance of that event had been watered down! The error may have already been corrected but the cause (source) of the error may still be in  place !   Help the President do his job by providing factual information regarding educational practices in the services! </p>
<p>Bottom line here is to go back to the K-12 groups and start cleaning up that mess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PS This particular EO was definitely crafted by a lawyer, as shown by the clauses about severability, liability, and implementation.
I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen that in many of the others where I&#039;ve looked at the text itself and not the media reports.
Maybe I&#039;ll check into it - (hah).

I suspect that the drafting was parceled out to people/groups with a particular interest in the subject matter, with varying degrees of experience in writing contracts and statutes.
Be interesting to know who the ghost-writers were.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS This particular EO was definitely crafted by a lawyer, as shown by the clauses about severability, liability, and implementation.<br />
I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen that in many of the others where I&#8217;ve looked at the text itself and not the media reports.<br />
Maybe I&#8217;ll check into it &#8211; (hah).</p>
<p>I suspect that the drafting was parceled out to people/groups with a particular interest in the subject matter, with varying degrees of experience in writing contracts and statutes.<br />
Be interesting to know who the ghost-writers were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Neo &#062; &quot;It [DEI] started to be implemented during the Obama administration, to the best of my recollection, and picked up enormous steam during the Biden administration. It is deeply entrenched now.&quot;

That&#039;s only 16 years: how can a culture change that fast and still be deep?
I&#039;m hoping that the observations in the comments here are correct: that a lot of the wokery is lip-service to the priorities of the (corrupted) brass.
However, since the academies have had the same 16 years to indoctrinate the new officer corps, and some of the classes are coming in from infected high schools, I suppose the rot (IOW, sincere believers) can be wide-spread and many layers deep by now.

@ Molly Brown &#062; &quot;He can demote the recalcitrant officers and replace them with ones who actually have principles and the backbone to honor them.&quot;
I really, really hope that you are correct about Trump reinstating the anti-covid-vax service members, but how many want to come back, after being shafted before and starting new careers?

@ J.J. &#062; &quot;Force many of the “gentlemen” high ranks to retire and start promoting the tigers. That will attract the type of volunteers that we need. But it will take some time.
I’m sure there are some who will welcome the change, but &lt;b&gt;they may not be as numerous as we hope.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;

Or as numerous as we need.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Neo &gt; &#8220;It [DEI] started to be implemented during the Obama administration, to the best of my recollection, and picked up enormous steam during the Biden administration. It is deeply entrenched now.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s only 16 years: how can a culture change that fast and still be deep?<br />
I&#8217;m hoping that the observations in the comments here are correct: that a lot of the wokery is lip-service to the priorities of the (corrupted) brass.<br />
However, since the academies have had the same 16 years to indoctrinate the new officer corps, and some of the classes are coming in from infected high schools, I suppose the rot (IOW, sincere believers) can be wide-spread and many layers deep by now.</p>
<p>@ Molly Brown &gt; &#8220;He can demote the recalcitrant officers and replace them with ones who actually have principles and the backbone to honor them.&#8221;<br />
I really, really hope that you are correct about Trump reinstating the anti-covid-vax service members, but how many want to come back, after being shafted before and starting new careers?</p>
<p>@ J.J. &gt; &#8220;Force many of the “gentlemen” high ranks to retire and start promoting the tigers. That will attract the type of volunteers that we need. But it will take some time.<br />
I’m sure there are some who will welcome the change, but <b>they may not be as numerous as we hope.</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>Or as numerous as we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[J.J.:

I always welcome your comments and your experience.

With no experience myself I do hope there are embers of warrior spirit which may flame yet again. 

The time is right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.J.:</p>
<p>I always welcome your comments and your experience.</p>
<p>With no experience myself I do hope there are embers of warrior spirit which may flame yet again. </p>
<p>The time is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 04:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Vets here are welcome to correct me, but I suspect there is a deep hunger in our military to get rid of the woke.&quot; - huxley

Ten years ago, I was invited to a &quot;Dining In&quot; (Formal squadron dinner - not something we did back in the day.) by the CO of the Squadron I was a member of in the 1960s.  

It was a strange experience for me. There were a number of speeches given by various squadron members.  Most of them were well intended and well given but were mostly about feelings and ambitions.  

In my day any speeches would have been about being aggressive, hitting the target, flying a perfect carrier approach, flying tight formation, and other operational issues.  Every pilot in the squadron wanted to be the best pilot in the Navy and tried to prove it every day in the sky. Feelings, ambitions outside being a pilot, and the like?  Not a chance.

They were nice young men and women, and probably could do a decent job, but they were markedly different than the old days.  I realized then that there had been a culture shift in Navy Air.  I think Obama and his minions changed the culture. It&#039;s a nicer, more nuanced military with goals other than maximum combat lethality. 

It&#039;s an all-volunteer service now, so what the leaders project is what we get. Force many of the &quot;gentlemen&quot; high ranks to retire and start promoting the tigers.  That will attract the type of volunteers that we need.  But it will take some time.

I&#039;m sure there are some who will welcome the change, but they may not be as numerous as we hope.  Time will tell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vets here are welcome to correct me, but I suspect there is a deep hunger in our military to get rid of the woke.&#8221; &#8211; huxley</p>
<p>Ten years ago, I was invited to a &#8220;Dining In&#8221; (Formal squadron dinner &#8211; not something we did back in the day.) by the CO of the Squadron I was a member of in the 1960s.  </p>
<p>It was a strange experience for me. There were a number of speeches given by various squadron members.  Most of them were well intended and well given but were mostly about feelings and ambitions.  </p>
<p>In my day any speeches would have been about being aggressive, hitting the target, flying a perfect carrier approach, flying tight formation, and other operational issues.  Every pilot in the squadron wanted to be the best pilot in the Navy and tried to prove it every day in the sky. Feelings, ambitions outside being a pilot, and the like?  Not a chance.</p>
<p>They were nice young men and women, and probably could do a decent job, but they were markedly different than the old days.  I realized then that there had been a culture shift in Navy Air.  I think Obama and his minions changed the culture. It&#8217;s a nicer, more nuanced military with goals other than maximum combat lethality. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an all-volunteer service now, so what the leaders project is what we get. Force many of the &#8220;gentlemen&#8221; high ranks to retire and start promoting the tigers.  That will attract the type of volunteers that we need.  But it will take some time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are some who will welcome the change, but they may not be as numerous as we hope.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Molly Brown		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/28/and-about-the-military/#comment-2785198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molly Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 03:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139620#comment-2785198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget the service members that were discharged for refusing the vaxx.
Trump has offered to reinstate them at full rank and with back pay.  He can demote the recalcitrant officers and replace them with ones who actually have principles and the backbone to honor them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the service members that were discharged for refusing the vaxx.<br />
Trump has offered to reinstate them at full rank and with back pay.  He can demote the recalcitrant officers and replace them with ones who actually have principles and the backbone to honor them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
