<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Pete Hegseth hearings	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R2L		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[West TX Intermediate Crude on January 15, 2025 at 10:41 am said:
In my dreams, Pete to Warren:  &quot;Not even 1/1024th of a general.”   LOL!

From AF&#039;s Redstate citation at 11:48 pm: &quot;I wish he’d been stronger on the subject of post-service employment by a Defense contractor.&quot;

I think his reply should have been along the lines of &quot;Senator, I favor the same restrictions on post service employment for the senior DOD and military leadership as should apply to the members of Congress and their senior staffers.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>West TX Intermediate Crude on January 15, 2025 at 10:41 am said:<br />
In my dreams, Pete to Warren:  &#8220;Not even 1/1024th of a general.”   LOL!</p>
<p>From AF&#8217;s Redstate citation at 11:48 pm: &#8220;I wish he’d been stronger on the subject of post-service employment by a Defense contractor.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think his reply should have been along the lines of &#8220;Senator, I favor the same restrictions on post service employment for the senior DOD and military leadership as should apply to the members of Congress and their senior staffers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LordAzrael		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordAzrael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Ns on January 15, 2025 at 5:38 pm said:
Can anyone put in some context as to why he was asked about what “jagoff” is? Why on earth was that even a question?&quot;

Clearly it was to show he didn&#039;t respect military officers. 

He nailed the answer though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ns on January 15, 2025 at 5:38 pm said:<br />
Can anyone put in some context as to why he was asked about what “jagoff” is? Why on earth was that even a question?&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly it was to show he didn&#8217;t respect military officers. </p>
<p>He nailed the answer though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When the general says, &quot;Colonel, you have a problem retaining (graduating, accepting, etc) women?&quot; you&#039;d better believe that the colonel takes that as a quota and will do something, anything to standards, performance, any other issues, to not look as if he&#039;s some kind of MAGA type.
After the Fort Hood shooting, General Casey--I think it was he--said he hopes this doesn&#039;t damage diversity which is our strength.  Which means if you have a Muslim officer who spends his spare time playing jihadi and pretending to wear suicide vests, you&#039;d better keep your fool mouth shut.  Yessir, General, sir.


Nope.  No quotas at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the general says, &#8220;Colonel, you have a problem retaining (graduating, accepting, etc) women?&#8221; you&#8217;d better believe that the colonel takes that as a quota and will do something, anything to standards, performance, any other issues, to not look as if he&#8217;s some kind of MAGA type.<br />
After the Fort Hood shooting, General Casey&#8211;I think it was he&#8211;said he hopes this doesn&#8217;t damage diversity which is our strength.  Which means if you have a Muslim officer who spends his spare time playing jihadi and pretending to wear suicide vests, you&#8217;d better keep your fool mouth shut.  Yessir, General, sir.</p>
<p>Nope.  No quotas at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ns		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can anyone put in some context as to why he was asked about what “jagoff” is? Why on earth was that even a question?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone put in some context as to why he was asked about what “jagoff” is? Why on earth was that even a question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: West TX Intermediate Crude		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[West TX Intermediate Crude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my dreams, Pete to Warren:
&quot;Senator, I&#039;m not a general.  Not even 1/1024th of a general.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my dreams, Pete to Warren:<br />
&#8220;Senator, I&#8217;m not a general.  Not even 1/1024th of a general.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They lost the last election because they—PROUDLY—showed themselves to be shameless, mendacious, outrageous hysterical apparatchiks.**

The lessons they learned from this defeat:
be even MORE shameless, MORE mendacious, MORE outrageous, MORE hysterical apparatchiks.

MORE DISGUSTING. 

One wouldn’t have believed that it were possible. 

One would have been wrong. 

** Which would already have been well known to anyone paying attention (or not totally brainwashed), particularly after the Kavanaugh atrocity…but of course even far before that odious chapter in Congressional history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lost the last election because they—PROUDLY—showed themselves to be shameless, mendacious, outrageous hysterical apparatchiks.**</p>
<p>The lessons they learned from this defeat:<br />
be even MORE shameless, MORE mendacious, MORE outrageous, MORE hysterical apparatchiks.</p>
<p>MORE DISGUSTING. </p>
<p>One wouldn’t have believed that it were possible. </p>
<p>One would have been wrong. </p>
<p>** Which would already have been well known to anyone paying attention (or not totally brainwashed), particularly after the Kavanaugh atrocity…but of course even far before that odious chapter in Congressional history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marlene		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marlene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aesopfan, thanks for the Babylon Bee link.   Got a good laugh!  
  (And to avoid spoiling it for others, I&#039;ll be vague in this bit, by using just a pronoun.)
  They are said to be the pitbulls of the dwarfs!  
Lol!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesopfan, thanks for the Babylon Bee link.   Got a good laugh!<br />
  (And to avoid spoiling it for others, I&#8217;ll be vague in this bit, by using just a pronoun.)<br />
  They are said to be the pitbulls of the dwarfs!<br />
Lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 04:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Streiff had a good wrap-up of today&#039;s hearing, in addition to his &quot;this is what to look for&quot; post before it began. His forecasting held up well, and he made a lot of important points about why the Democrats&#039; major complaints are not valid ones.

https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseths-confirmation-hearing-starts-in-30-minutes-this-is-what-you-need-to-know-n2184315

He covered most of the exchanges that have made the sound-bites playlist, and a couple which haven&#039;t.

https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseth-brings-his-a-game-and-gets-the-job-done-n2184351
&lt;blockquote&gt;
It is difficult to get away from the feeling that the Democrats knew they had nothing to stop him, so they resorted to smearing him as much as possible before he takes office.

Hegseth came across weakest on the complaint that he&#039;d refused to engage in one-on-one meetings with any of the Democrats other than the ranking member. His reason for doing so was obvious. The substance of any conversation would be lied about or distorted, and the conversation would give the Democrats a chance to test how he would respond to questions. Hegseth unconvincingly passed this off as &quot;scheduling conflicts&quot; because you can&#039;t very well try to come across as bipartisan while revealing that you don&#039;t trust the Democrats.

I wish he&#039;d been stronger on the subject of post-service employment by a Defense contractor. Had Warren not been so eager to score points, she might have inflicted some damage.

Hegseth got a lot of help from the Republican side, with Oklahoma&#039;s Markwayne Mullin delivering the hardest blow.

MUST WATCH: Sen. Markwayne Mullin&#039;s FULL remarks in defense of Pete Hegseth. Powerful. Absolute masterclass. pic.twitter.com/sr2ugX4T6Y

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 14, 2025
You have to listen to this to fully appreciate it.

In terms of optics, Hegseth was polite, responsive, and telegenic. He was able to successfully filibuster during some particularly nasty personal attacks and not look flustered or angry. In terms of intelligence, he may very well have been one of the two or three smartest guys in the room. He was not some weary, gray little man looking for that final big job before landing the seven or eight-figure corporate board sinecure; Hegseth came across as a man who can bring the warrior ethos back to the Pentagon. He successfully packaged (in my view) his past personal troubles as a redemption story. I think he was able to distinguish between his respect for women serving in the Armed Forces and his antipathy toward them serving in direct combat units. I came away believing that with the right deputies and service secretaries, Hegseth just might be able to undo 16 years of damage.

Bottom line: Hegseth did what he needed to do to get committee approval though that approval will probably be on a very rigid party line. He may lose a Republican in the floor vote (looking at Utah&#039;s John Curtis), and I think we can count on Lisa Murkowski voting with the Democrats. Worst casing it, JD Vance will have to break a tie.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And in re the complaints about him being a super-terrorist (aka Christian) because tattoos!

https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/phcross.jpeg?w=641

As for &quot;politicizing the military&quot; (which the Democrats have done to the extreme, but they insist that doesn&#039;t count if THEY do it, only if someone wants to unravel their disasters), maybe we need some changes in priorities: 
https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/wounded.png?w=640

And the last word goes to the Babylon Bee.
https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/20250109_145713.jpg?w=749]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Streiff had a good wrap-up of today&#8217;s hearing, in addition to his &#8220;this is what to look for&#8221; post before it began. His forecasting held up well, and he made a lot of important points about why the Democrats&#8217; major complaints are not valid ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseths-confirmation-hearing-starts-in-30-minutes-this-is-what-you-need-to-know-n2184315" rel="nofollow ugc">https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseths-confirmation-hearing-starts-in-30-minutes-this-is-what-you-need-to-know-n2184315</a></p>
<p>He covered most of the exchanges that have made the sound-bites playlist, and a couple which haven&#8217;t.</p>
<p><a href="https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseth-brings-his-a-game-and-gets-the-job-done-n2184351" rel="nofollow ugc">https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/01/14/pete-hegseth-brings-his-a-game-and-gets-the-job-done-n2184351</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
It is difficult to get away from the feeling that the Democrats knew they had nothing to stop him, so they resorted to smearing him as much as possible before he takes office.</p>
<p>Hegseth came across weakest on the complaint that he&#8217;d refused to engage in one-on-one meetings with any of the Democrats other than the ranking member. His reason for doing so was obvious. The substance of any conversation would be lied about or distorted, and the conversation would give the Democrats a chance to test how he would respond to questions. Hegseth unconvincingly passed this off as &#8220;scheduling conflicts&#8221; because you can&#8217;t very well try to come across as bipartisan while revealing that you don&#8217;t trust the Democrats.</p>
<p>I wish he&#8217;d been stronger on the subject of post-service employment by a Defense contractor. Had Warren not been so eager to score points, she might have inflicted some damage.</p>
<p>Hegseth got a lot of help from the Republican side, with Oklahoma&#8217;s Markwayne Mullin delivering the hardest blow.</p>
<p>MUST WATCH: Sen. Markwayne Mullin&#8217;s FULL remarks in defense of Pete Hegseth. Powerful. Absolute masterclass. pic.twitter.com/sr2ugX4T6Y</p>
<p>— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 14, 2025<br />
You have to listen to this to fully appreciate it.</p>
<p>In terms of optics, Hegseth was polite, responsive, and telegenic. He was able to successfully filibuster during some particularly nasty personal attacks and not look flustered or angry. In terms of intelligence, he may very well have been one of the two or three smartest guys in the room. He was not some weary, gray little man looking for that final big job before landing the seven or eight-figure corporate board sinecure; Hegseth came across as a man who can bring the warrior ethos back to the Pentagon. He successfully packaged (in my view) his past personal troubles as a redemption story. I think he was able to distinguish between his respect for women serving in the Armed Forces and his antipathy toward them serving in direct combat units. I came away believing that with the right deputies and service secretaries, Hegseth just might be able to undo 16 years of damage.</p>
<p>Bottom line: Hegseth did what he needed to do to get committee approval though that approval will probably be on a very rigid party line. He may lose a Republican in the floor vote (looking at Utah&#8217;s John Curtis), and I think we can count on Lisa Murkowski voting with the Democrats. Worst casing it, JD Vance will have to break a tie.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And in re the complaints about him being a super-terrorist (aka Christian) because tattoos!</p>
<p><a href="https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/phcross.jpeg?w=641" rel="nofollow ugc">https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/phcross.jpeg?w=641</a></p>
<p>As for &#8220;politicizing the military&#8221; (which the Democrats have done to the extreme, but they insist that doesn&#8217;t count if THEY do it, only if someone wants to unravel their disasters), maybe we need some changes in priorities:<br />
<a href="https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/wounded.png?w=640" rel="nofollow ugc">https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/wounded.png?w=640</a></p>
<p>And the last word goes to the Babylon Bee.<br />
<a href="https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/20250109_145713.jpg?w=749" rel="nofollow ugc">https://accordingtohoyt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/20250109_145713.jpg?w=749</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 03:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that one real takeaway from this hearing was the fact that the female Democrat Senators revealed their true characters by the questions they asked, how they behaved, and the tone of their questions, and it wasn&#039;t pretty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one real takeaway from this hearing was the fact that the female Democrat Senators revealed their true characters by the questions they asked, how they behaved, and the tone of their questions, and it wasn&#8217;t pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J.J.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2025/01/14/the-pete-hegseth-hearings/#comment-2782461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thenewneo.com/?p=139337#comment-2782461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I watched it all.  Major political theater. The Democrats were uniformly antagonistic.   Pete acquitted himself well.  I would not have been able to stay as unruffled as he seemed.

Is he qualified? Is anybody actually qualified to be Sec Def?  It&#039;s a huge job with many moving parts.  Anyone who has held it has had to rely on an army of subordinates and advisors to guide him. Pete knows this, and his strong desire to put the mission of combat lethality foremost will make a huge difference in getting our military back on track.  I hope he&#039;s confirmed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched it all.  Major political theater. The Democrats were uniformly antagonistic.   Pete acquitted himself well.  I would not have been able to stay as unruffled as he seemed.</p>
<p>Is he qualified? Is anybody actually qualified to be Sec Def?  It&#8217;s a huge job with many moving parts.  Anyone who has held it has had to rely on an army of subordinates and advisors to guide him. Pete knows this, and his strong desire to put the mission of combat lethality foremost will make a huge difference in getting our military back on track.  I hope he&#8217;s confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
