Cancel culture is a good phrase to describe that elites don’t have permission to speak the truth, when those truths are not politically correct. Like lower avg IQs for the avg Black, and the f@ct that men and women are both physically and psychologically different.

Cancel culture is not dead yet, in fact we’ve only ended the beginning of cancel culture. Going forward there will advances against it and for more of it. Then, hopefully, we will be ending it in most places while there are few or no places where it is expanding.

Trump winning, tho still quite close with 75 million Harris votes, means all possible reasons for problems can be discussed. But most Dem voters aren’t going to be voting Rep in the next election. Sadly.

McCain ran on “repeal Obamacare” in 2016. When returned to office in that election, what did he do? Well, you remember, he didn’t vote for the repeal of Obamacare, did he?

What did any of the Republicans in Congress do, with that victory that Trump earned for them in 2016? Was there legislation ready to go? Or, did they piss away the opportunity presented, and go on to lose the 2018 mid-terms?

Anyone who thinks we aren’t being played by the coterie of incompetents and wastrels in DC is a purblind fool. Everything that’s happened over the last fifty years in that city could best be understood as a Mafia-style “Bust-Out” operation, conducted by organized crime. It’s hardly accidental that Nancy Pelosi’s family connections trace back to the Baltimore mob, either.

Follow the money: Start with the proposition that all these “initiatives” like Solyndra are criminal conspiracies from the get-go. Where did the cash wind up? Same with the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act”, and everything else done under the masthead of Captain Senile, Joe Biden.

I would very much like to see someone investigate how it is that an obviously senile man, who cannot be prosecuted for his felony-level security violations by the Federal prosecutors that looked into the affair because they feel he’s too far gone into senility… How the hell is it that his signature is still acceptable on a pardon? Who’s actually doing the approvals, here?

I say there ought to be a little look-see into the whole affair, a determination made as to when he slipped the surly bounds of competency, and then prosecutions galore for whoever was using him as a figurehead. Every signature coming out of the Biden White House ought to be invalidated, or the Presidential office becomes meaningless.

The President is either the responsible party, or he isn’t. There are no provisions in the Constitution for an Executive branch run by a committee, and that principle needs to be re-established NOW. The people who frauded him into office and who used him as a figurehead need to be identified and dealt with.

I don’t think people understand what has been going on in this country.

I mention this to cut through the fuzz; you don’t have to be certain that collusion happened to allow that it was fishy enough to swing sentiment against the Establishment of both parties. They at minimum failed to avoid the appearance of impropriety, and it hardly matters whether it was wrongdoing or incompetence that earned the voters’ contempt; either way, McCain and Romney behaved so suspiciously that it affected future elections, smoothing Trump’s path to victory as the anti-Establishment candidate, so it has earned serious consideration as a factor in Obama’s own wins.

But these “clowns”, “comedians” and “jokers” are deadly serious.

ROTFL at them, no matter how satisfying, can only go so far.

Trump and his people must quickly find a way to tighten up election rules NATIONWIDE…along with the entire panoply of problems and crises that “Biden” has gifted them (and the country).

What we’re witnessing is a real-life iteration of the South Park “Underpants Gnome Business Plan”.

First time I saw that bit of social commentary, I was struck by just how much in the world around me resonated with that whole cartoon episode concept. I mean, it was viciously satirical social commentary, if you applied it to most of the leftoid program.

I mean, literally… Most of their stuff, whether it’s the homeless programs, or their idiotic ideas about the justice system and criminals? You’re left sitting there once they’re finished expounding on their ideas, and you have to ask “Uh… And… Then what?”

Which they can never answer. They’re also incapable of making the observations and the follow-on adjustments that they’d need to make if they were really halfway competent and intelligent.

You can always identify them by the fact that they never, ever cease doubling-down on failing propositions. Crime is up? Release more criminals! It’s not their fault; they’re downtrodden! Be more understanding, caring… Surely they’ll respond to our good intentions!!!

Pragmatism is an obscenity to the leftoid. They’re incapable of observing and learning from those observations.

Even though they will likely, as indicated, eventually destroy that system.

But what if that destruction is precisely the goal?
And, the corollary: what if they believe that THEY will survive it?

In which case their “stupidity” lies in believing they will still be able to benefit (or at least not be negatively affected) from any consequences of such destruction.

Or does it? …As one looks at the current global elites and experts, cf. Klaus Schwab, et al., and their goals and expectations…

(Might this be termed the Revolutionary’s paradox?)

Put another way, the only thing that has thus far preserved the USA is its Constitution. (Which is why the Democrats so despise it.)

One of the issues you’re constantly going to run into with the people who game the system is that while they’re amazingly good at sussing out the rules of the game, and then working within those rules to suborn the game, the issue with that is that they are necessarily operating at a remove from reality. How far they’re off from that is dependent upon how good simulation they’re working within is maintaining fidelity with what the actual conditions of the real world are.

Most leftoid academics (Obama is one) live inside their own heads. They propose; their own minds dispose. Reality never enters; in their minds, their perfect confections of satisfying outcomes always eventuate, and then if they don’t actually come about in the outer world of reality? Why, then… It must be the fault of the wreckers!!! Their ideas are perfect; their unflawed understandings are always unquestionable, never to be examined or assessed as to whether or not they work.

For the Obama-like, the fact that their plots and programs don’t actually produce the predicted and planned results is something they can never comprehend; those failures are invisible, and if the harsh light of reality is forced on them, then they’ll blame someone else, for deliberately acting to destroy their ideas.

These people make up their minds once, and then never have another thought about whatever it was. They can’t; it’s all internal, with total disregard to anything outside their heads.

For an Obama-ite, the failures of Obamacare and all his other initiatives don’t exist; they see criticism and anyone pointing out the failures as strictly ideological phenomenon, not the imposition of reality.

Creatures of the mind, they’re forever locked into a desperate fantasy world where their ideas reign unquestioned, adamantine and perfect. It’s a sad thing, when reality ensues… As it inevitably must.

This is why the idjits who proceeded along Gramsci’s planned takeover are such fools; they think the institutions that they captured are the source of things like “trust in the media”. If only they can control the New York Times, they think, they can control the narrative and everything downstream of that.

The issue, there? The New York Times fills a function, and that function is “Provide trustworthy news to the public”. If by capturing that institution they render it untrustworthy, which is what they’ve done…? Then, buh-bye to the influence they thought they’d have. The public will rightly observe the ideological bias, and then cease “trusting” the New York Times, rendering that “capture” effectively meaningless.

That’s the point that Gramsci missed; he was, like most leftoids, a magical thinker: He truly believed that the things which flowed from institutions like the New York Times were inherent qualities, not the result of what those institutions did. His idea was “Seize the institution, use it to enact our programs…”, but the problem is that once they started in on that, the institution immediately lost the value they thought they’d seized control over. Same with academia; you’re seeing the result, today, as more and more people eschew the academic course and don’t bother going to college. Eventually, they’ll have so devalued the diplomas that they offer that they’ll be effectively useless, and nobody will bother with obtaining them.

No value? Nobody is going to pay attention to the institution, any more. Once a critical mass in the public mindset is reached, it’s all over for them.

The leftoid model of the world is highly flawed; they’ve mistaken the smoke for the fire. Because of that, they’re going to do what such idealistic idjits always do: Crash and burn.

Trick is, to keep them from taking the rest of civilization down with their stupidity.