Thanks for the link.
I’ve seen books written over the years about the phenomenon of expending more time and money worrying about & guarding against improbable events, than on the ones that are statistically more likely.
Reasons vary, but the “if it saves one life” group NEVER does any studies to find out how many lives are lost because of their rules.

And so many of the political and economic policies of the people in this group (IMO they overlap bigly with Democrats in general) are also internally contradictory. Save the Eagles! & Build Wind Farms! is one such contradictory set of beliefs that too many “environmentalists” hold simultaneously, despite evidence of eagle deaths continuing to pile up — pun intended.

I am under the impression that a proper constitution should really mostly address “how” a government is to operate, not so much on “what” it is allowed or compelled to do. Even where the US constitution follows that pattern fairly well, it already tops out at over 4000 words.

the drug legalization, that will lead to a irrational stoned populace, thats prop 3, down here, look at how oblivious people are in New York and California, as long as they have their lethe

In your progression “compliance” should be “participation.” You must participate in their evil.

now in pennsylvania after many years they did prosecute gosnell but not after many women were butchered,

remember their hat trick, we only want acceptance (of x or y practice), then tolerance, then whol e hearted approval,
then compliance,
not to go theological, but it explains more than conventional analyst,

You must worship the Beast, the Old Gods if you must,

so no it’s not about humanitarian considerations at all
otherwise they wouldn’t prosecute abortion protesters harsher than rioters and rapists

Related, this post at X about excessive fear of improbable events. The writer seems to see this as a strictly female phenomenon: I think it may be more common among women, but is not unique to them.

https://x.com/DrInsensitive/status/1852292346437648533

If some people would quit demonizing the “parasite in the womb” and start emphasizing the joys of parenthood, that might be all the therapy that’s needed.
Society used to support having babies, and that buttressed family support; not much “extra” support was needed when raising children was considered necessary and important.

There seems to me to be a logical inconsistency in simultaneously advocating the reduction of the population through abortion AND importing non-citizens because there aren’t enough people to do the work.
Which is how you know that “doing the work” is NOT the driving agenda.

as if one couldn’t tell.

“Tokophobia….I think I have it, and I don’t even have to worry about getting pregnant.”

That was funny, but it’s possible that, with so many people pretending that men-with-uteruses and women-with-penises exist, tokophobia is a rational response.

David+Foster on October 30, 2024 at 5:14 pm said:
I suspect that some of this is like the fear of airliner crashes…if someone has a sufficiently nightmarish scenario in their mind, arguments about how unlikely they are–even very solid arguments–are likely to fall on deaf ears.