<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Critical Legal Studies: the radical assault on truth in American law was already apparent many decades ago	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[its been about 30 years since the whole mainstreaming of homosexuality has been moving at light speed, the clinton administration certainly had a part decisions like colorado v romer,  the media went whole hog in parallel, will and grace and other tv shows, &#039;the love that won&#039;t speak it&#039;s name&#039; is the one that won&#039;t shut up, and after obergefell, in 2013, they skipped toward transgenderism because why not, &#039;love not hate&#039; then bake the cake, or we will bankrupt you,

the fundamental fact, is men (and women) know the Truth, and they deny it, and God leaves them to their delusion, sexual immorality is by no means the only variety, and those of binary even less so, but we see the insanity in richard levine and samuel brinton, who are not only bereft of common sense but ethics
&#039;thou shalt not steal&#039; among other things, of course if the world treats Christianity and Orthodox Judaism as an absurdity, well something else fills the vacuum, certainly in Christian countries, in Western Europe, the strong faith of Islam is filling the pews, because the Church of England is hollow,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its been about 30 years since the whole mainstreaming of homosexuality has been moving at light speed, the clinton administration certainly had a part decisions like colorado v romer,  the media went whole hog in parallel, will and grace and other tv shows, &#8216;the love that won&#8217;t speak it&#8217;s name&#8217; is the one that won&#8217;t shut up, and after obergefell, in 2013, they skipped toward transgenderism because why not, &#8216;love not hate&#8217; then bake the cake, or we will bankrupt you,</p>
<p>the fundamental fact, is men (and women) know the Truth, and they deny it, and God leaves them to their delusion, sexual immorality is by no means the only variety, and those of binary even less so, but we see the insanity in richard levine and samuel brinton, who are not only bereft of common sense but ethics<br />
&#8216;thou shalt not steal&#8217; among other things, of course if the world treats Christianity and Orthodox Judaism as an absurdity, well something else fills the vacuum, certainly in Christian countries, in Western Europe, the strong faith of Islam is filling the pews, because the Church of England is hollow,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anne		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One needs only to review the rapid rate of change vis a vis the issue of Homosexuality. For thousands of years it was considered illegal. But then the legal challenge began. One year it is illegal anywhere anytime, and shortly afterward it is only illegal in public places. Then there are some very ugly nudist parades and voila--now it&#039;s completely legal anywhere anytime. Shortly after that, the Protestant churches were forced into accepting homosexuality, homosexual bishops, homosexual marriage, etc. Do you need me to recount how our children are being MANDATED to observe this now &quot;natural state of affairs&quot; in early childhood public school education? How parents are now living in fear of loosing their children through the &quot;legal system&quot; in case they don&#039;t accept homosexuality as &quot;normal&quot;?  How long did it take for that complete turn around of events? 

From the time the well-organized and well funded effort to &quot;change the law&quot; to today has been, I believe, just sixty years. I have not read the books being discussed here, but I am quite certain that San Francisco was the center of this legal movement. Most likely funded in large part by Hollywood.  

I mentioned here before that sometime between 1971-74 an entire group of applicants sitting for the law degree in Northern California failed the ethics segment of that exam. My memory on this is faulty because I was not involved with the law, but where there is some smoke there is . . .

When I go back in my mind and try to find more information, what I remember the most is that there was a name to that group. I can&#039;t remember the name for certain, but the name &quot;Hastings&quot; keeps coming back. Could it have been that the group that failed were graduates of the Hastings School of Law ?-I am sorry I cannot remember the details better. It was just mentioned at lunch one day with some acquaintances in San Francisco. 

You would find it very interesting to search for &quot;Hastings Law School&quot; at wikipedia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One needs only to review the rapid rate of change vis a vis the issue of Homosexuality. For thousands of years it was considered illegal. But then the legal challenge began. One year it is illegal anywhere anytime, and shortly afterward it is only illegal in public places. Then there are some very ugly nudist parades and voila&#8211;now it&#8217;s completely legal anywhere anytime. Shortly after that, the Protestant churches were forced into accepting homosexuality, homosexual bishops, homosexual marriage, etc. Do you need me to recount how our children are being MANDATED to observe this now &#8220;natural state of affairs&#8221; in early childhood public school education? How parents are now living in fear of loosing their children through the &#8220;legal system&#8221; in case they don&#8217;t accept homosexuality as &#8220;normal&#8221;?  How long did it take for that complete turn around of events? </p>
<p>From the time the well-organized and well funded effort to &#8220;change the law&#8221; to today has been, I believe, just sixty years. I have not read the books being discussed here, but I am quite certain that San Francisco was the center of this legal movement. Most likely funded in large part by Hollywood.  </p>
<p>I mentioned here before that sometime between 1971-74 an entire group of applicants sitting for the law degree in Northern California failed the ethics segment of that exam. My memory on this is faulty because I was not involved with the law, but where there is some smoke there is . . .</p>
<p>When I go back in my mind and try to find more information, what I remember the most is that there was a name to that group. I can&#8217;t remember the name for certain, but the name &#8220;Hastings&#8221; keeps coming back. Could it have been that the group that failed were graduates of the Hastings School of Law ?-I am sorry I cannot remember the details better. It was just mentioned at lunch one day with some acquaintances in San Francisco. </p>
<p>You would find it very interesting to search for &#8220;Hastings Law School&#8221; at wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kermit won&#039;t respond to substantial questions about the Rule of Kermit, the tyrany of anarchy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kermit won&#8217;t respond to substantial questions about the Rule of Kermit, the tyrany of anarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karmi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;He did have time to question my faith&lt;/blockquote&gt;
GC<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> – you have no “faith” to question – since you are the perfect example of what a Christian Hypocrite is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He did have time to question my faith</p></blockquote>
<p>GC™ – you have no “faith” to question – since you are the perfect example of what a Christian Hypocrite is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R2L		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768570</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karmi, you probably really know this already, but sometimes in bears repetition:

Evolution by natural selection is NOT &quot;survival of the fittest&quot;. That implies an active role for &quot;Nature&quot; to achieve a goal, such as bigger teeth, longer claws, bigger antlers, etc.
Evolution is really passive, and the species that survive are radomly by happenstance those who are best ADAPTED to a changing or changed environment. 

Now, humanity (as ultra social animals) has also introduced societies and norms and culture into the mix. Evolution of cultural practices throws a wrench into the evolution cogs, since culture is quite subjective and variable as to what seems to be good for survial. Plus culture  can be maintained or changed on a very rapid time scale, compared to the normal path of genetic impacts, etc.  

I was going to say something about the concept of genetically based group evolution, but right now I will not go down that distractive path.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karmi, you probably really know this already, but sometimes in bears repetition:</p>
<p>Evolution by natural selection is NOT &#8220;survival of the fittest&#8221;. That implies an active role for &#8220;Nature&#8221; to achieve a goal, such as bigger teeth, longer claws, bigger antlers, etc.<br />
Evolution is really passive, and the species that survive are radomly by happenstance those who are best ADAPTED to a changing or changed environment. </p>
<p>Now, humanity (as ultra social animals) has also introduced societies and norms and culture into the mix. Evolution of cultural practices throws a wrench into the evolution cogs, since culture is quite subjective and variable as to what seems to be good for survial. Plus culture  can be maintained or changed on a very rapid time scale, compared to the normal path of genetic impacts, etc.  </p>
<p>I was going to say something about the concept of genetically based group evolution, but right now I will not go down that distractive path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The sun has set, time to put away all the tools, and Kermit did not answer Niketas&#039;s question.  He did have time to question my faith; such is how trolls roll.

Didndunuffin doesn&#039;t stop if you are not African American.  The law is unjust,  the police are corrupt, ... anarchy is better .....  Authority is the problem?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sun has set, time to put away all the tools, and Kermit did not answer Niketas&#8217;s question.  He did have time to question my faith; such is how trolls roll.</p>
<p>Didndunuffin doesn&#8217;t stop if you are not African American.  The law is unjust,  the police are corrupt, &#8230; anarchy is better &#8230;..  Authority is the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Niketas Choniates		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Karmi: Too bad, I was hoping to hear what it was, in case it was new to me and changed how I thought about things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karmi: Too bad, I was hoping to hear what it was, in case it was new to me and changed how I thought about things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karmi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Niketas Choniates :)
&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay, you’ve moved elsewhere, a bunch of people have come with you, and all of them are waiting to hear you explain what your alternative to the rule of law is...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am a humble hermit so that question can&#039;t be answered. 

Have already had my say at October 26, 2024 at 1:07 pm. Thanks for the civil questions, but I am about done in this thread...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niketas Choniates 🙂</p>
<blockquote><p>Okay, you’ve moved elsewhere, a bunch of people have come with you, and all of them are waiting to hear you explain what your alternative to the rule of law is&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I am a humble hermit so that question can&#8217;t be answered. </p>
<p>Have already had my say at October 26, 2024 at 1:07 pm. Thanks for the civil questions, but I am about done in this thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karmi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GC<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> - do all Christians at your church behave as you do?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GC™ &#8211; do all Christians at your church behave as you do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karmi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2024/10/25/critical-legal-studies-the-radical-assault-on-truth-in-american-law-was-already-apparent-many-decades-ago/#comment-2768495</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=137704#comment-2768495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brian E
&lt;blockquote&gt;Please explain how that comment applies to the Critical Legal Studies topic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That &#039;&lt;i&gt;Just in an &lt;b&gt;Anarchist+Devil’s Advocate mood&lt;/b&gt; on the “Critical Legal Studies” topic…&lt;/i&gt;&#039; was in reference to October 25, 2024 at 6:45 pm comment:
&lt;blockquote&gt;@Geoffrey Britain – humans are natural born killers. Ask Genghis Khan if you don’t believe humble me.

As to – ‘humans are natural born killers‘ – it is the Rule of Law and Big Govt proponents that/who override Mother Nature and call such killers – “Murderers.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That Devil’s Advocate part of the Anarchist+Devil’s Advocate was in reference to &lt;i&gt;natural born killers&lt;/i&gt; being turned into &lt;i&gt;Murderers&lt;/i&gt; by Rule of Law and Big Govt proponents. I don&#039;t believe that people should just kill anyone they want to—but, I could be wrong since Mother Nature seems otherwise.

That comment was in the “Critical Legal Studies” thread. Yes, I know it all could&#039;ve been phrased better, but that is how I phrased it at that time...my fault.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian E</p>
<blockquote><p>Please explain how that comment applies to the Critical Legal Studies topic.</p></blockquote>
<p>That &#8216;<i>Just in an <b>Anarchist+Devil’s Advocate mood</b> on the “Critical Legal Studies” topic…</i>&#8216; was in reference to October 25, 2024 at 6:45 pm comment:</p>
<blockquote><p>@Geoffrey Britain – humans are natural born killers. Ask Genghis Khan if you don’t believe humble me.</p>
<p>As to – ‘humans are natural born killers‘ – it is the Rule of Law and Big Govt proponents that/who override Mother Nature and call such killers – “Murderers.”</p></blockquote>
<p>That Devil’s Advocate part of the Anarchist+Devil’s Advocate was in reference to <i>natural born killers</i> being turned into <i>Murderers</i> by Rule of Law and Big Govt proponents. I don&#8217;t believe that people should just kill anyone they want to—but, I could be wrong since Mother Nature seems otherwise.</p>
<p>That comment was in the “Critical Legal Studies” thread. Yes, I know it all could&#8217;ve been phrased better, but that is how I phrased it at that time&#8230;my fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
