As Trump himself remarked when he started, the Left is going to deliver fact-checks for his jokes.

They are clearly counting on their readers’ ignorance of the traditional format of the gala, where the leading candidates are not only expected but instructed to roast their counterparts.

https://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

The media will be instructed to provide all questions in advance for any press conference and they will be forbidden to ask questions not approved in advance.
The media will go along with this – for they too are merely puppets of the demokrat/ Obama party elites.
The media will most likely whisper under their breath that they are being hog tied, but they realize if they step out of bounds, they will be denied admittance into any press conference or presidential affair.
So they will go along to get along.
But they really will not be too bothered about this set up because they know that it is really their God, their Leader, their Fuhrer, Obama, running the show.

The Cackler is too stupid and dumb to formulate any of her own polices and frankly she has no need to formulate any policies.
All will be done for her by Obama and his handlers and like the brainless puppet she is, she will be just fine with this set up.

It will be a sweet deal for her.
She literally will have to do nothing – all will be done for her- and she can jet around the world in Air Force 1 cackling her brains out (assuming she has any brains).

Unlike Joke Bidet who at times can be defiant, cantankerous and probably difficult (are these traits typical of senile or near senile people??) , the Cackler will be totally compliant. She will be the 5 year old child in the WH.

Anyway, there is nothing on earth that will cause Cackler supporters to reconsider who they vote for. Her incompetence and ignorance she displayed (s) as VP or as a candidate for president will have zero effect on her standing amongst her supporters.

Once again, the bottom line: it is the voters of this nation that will be the vanguard in destroying our Constitutional Republic.

As I have said ad nauseam; the greatest threat a Constitutional Republic can face, is the voters, willingly and freely, voting for a national suicide.

There are also factors at play here other than pure intelligence. Work ethic and inclination are relevant. You can accomplish quite a bit with a high average or even average processor if you use it well. The personality that the good Lord gave you is also relevant. I get the sense that Kamala is lacking in both of those categories. Take her intelligence and package it in an individual with a stellar work ethic and who has been gifted with a compelling personality and that individual would be a far better politician than Kamala.

To Eeyore’s point about the interview – I learned from cold, hard experience during the Obama years that I am not a very good judge of political performances. I believed that Obama was awful during numerous debates and interviews only to watch his poll numbers go up afterwards. I thought Kamala was a trainwreck with Baier, but I would not be surprised at all if swing voters believed otherwise. That interview wasn’t directed at me.

That’s quite an admission.

I think people are treating general indications of intelligence for actual proof of it. In a word, credentialism. I simply do not believe any human system is foolproof.