do we believe the story filtered to bertrand and perez no,

on whose side is the regime, not ours,

…But Barnes thinks that the facts point to a set up by Deep State interests in creating a causus bellus for War With Iran. An October surprise, perhaps. In retaliation for the assassination of Trump, in part….

Mr. Barnes seems to forget that “Biden” is an ally of Iran’s.
(But given the generally high quality of his commentary, he’s allowed to swing and miss from time to time….)
– – – – – – – – – –
With regards to the announcement on Iran, I take it as simply more PURE DISTRACTION by the part of the Masters of Distraction and Coverup….AKA the “Biden” Administration.

Actually, it’s pretty well known that Iran would like to assassinate everyone in the U.S., it’s just that Trump is the most visible part of the iceberg.

I’m not persuaded by Barnes greater conspiracy — but this lesser one? I am.

Revised facts and timelines keep tumbling out, and inconsistencies and LEO disputes are undermining the Secret Service coverup, methinks. What are they hiding?

Via Instapundit tonight:
“Senators briefed by the Secret Service about last Saturday’s assassination attempt on Donald Trump telling media outlets about advance knowledge regarding Thomas Crooks who shot Mr. Trump.”

“Crooks identified as a threat 10 minutes before Trump took the stage.”
https://instapundit.com/661316/#disqus_thread

It seems the 26 minutes of LEO awareness has been pushed back to between 1 and 3 hours.

A NEW SOURCE from HS disputes Thomas Mathew Crooks as the victim of frequent bullying, and in fact, was not anti-social — he had his own set of friends.

Taormina recounts them being freshmen in HS together. Thomas was driven by maths and politics. (Hence, his engineering degree at community college.) He was seriously anti-political leadership and hostile to Trump.

When the friend said he was Hispanic and pro-Trump, Thomas said (or implied) that “he was stupid.” His arrogance about politics was manifest, even then.

In related revision, a neighbor of Thomas’ family says he’d never seen political signs on the home’s lawn.

It seems a number of opinion leaders have converged on the fact that the Truth is not coming from the top of the Secret Service — reportedly because of demands for silence from the White House, on pain of being fired.

Attorney Robert Barnes goes furthest, and sketches an outline of Deep State planning behind these events, and sees the nefarious benefit to leveraging a successful assassination of Trump.

First, there’s the timing — resorting to extreme means in the face of failure by lesser means. Next, there’s two facts that don’t fit a solo operation, but do fit in a set-up. Why has Thomas’ social media footprint been scrubbed? And finally, how and why did he die with a cell phone and a transmitter device on that roof?

Was the latter connected to the two IEDs in his car? To create a diversion? Perhaps.

But Barnes thinks that the facts point to a set up by Deep State interests in creating a causus bellus for War With Iran. An October surprise, perhaps. In retaliation for the assassination of Trump, in part.

And Thomas’s bombs to create a general and very public terrorist scene, in order to sell his social media with planted ties to Iran plots against Trump — but scrubbed to hide this, after his failure, says Barnes.

The convenience of these details undoubtedly suggest a story in the works during the last weekend to manage this assassination attempt. To stage-manage the desired outcome.

Barnes’ tale (listen to 18 to 22.5 minutes HERE https://rumble.com/v57c4xp-live-from-the-rnc.html?mref=22lbp&mrefc=2&e9s=rel_v1_a) is something once unthinkable. But today, gains greater plausibility — given the repeated and organised if not orchestrated attempts to jail and delegitimise Trump.

MORE details and sources relevant to Barnes’ case are introduced by Robert Gouviea in the first 12 minutes of his podcast on YouTube — and explored in detail in the following hour, plus. “Secret Service Coverup” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUwMGmhVp80

Of course, Barnes’ fingering of greater forces arranging to take advantage of circumstances is a huge conspiracy. But I don’t think it’s greater than Russiagate — but likely greater than the double impeachments that had Democrat leaders salivating to depose Trump.

Should we think less of those ensconced in the Feds permanent bureaucracy? Even though behind the scenes? Or is this more plausible? And more disturbing?

LOLZ.