My first thought exactly: the Democrats always project onto Republicans what they would like to do themselves.
Fortunately, they would have to go OUTSIDE military channels to do it:
https://redstate.com/wardclark/2024/07/02/armys-elite-delta-force-troopers-assassination-of-political-opponents-an-unlawful-order-n2176290

Of course, for the Democrats, finding a willing thug won’t be hard.

https://twitter.com/JayTownAlabama/status/1808231244020473964

Regarding Bill Barr, he was remarkably ineffective when faced with BLA and Antifa insurrection in the summer and fall of 2020. Now he realizes that the Brandon junta and leftists are a real serious threat. Congratulations Bill, where were you in the clutch?

Since faucis home made brew killed a million people and somehow hes unaccountable it made marc elias ballot avalanche possible although the collusion by brian kemp was necessary murdochs boys taking a dive on dominion

Marlene – Bill Barr is not trying to redeem himself. He’s been the same guy from the beginning. He respects the rule of law. He is a conservative. I watched the whole 17 minute interview. He really didn’t say anything complimentary about Trump. He’s just reached the conclusion that another four years of Biden/Harris would be so damaging that it is worth dealing with Trump and the potential damage that he would do. His reasoning is that one or other other is going to be president and the voter has to choose which one will do the least damage. That’s not much different from my thinking. Things like Title IX, Israel, and lawfare have caused me to change my thinking on that balance over the past few months, but the analysis is the same. It never ceases to amaze me how Trumpers (and Trump himself) think they can achieve addition by subtraction. Take the vote. Take the votes of double haters who, for whatever reason, decide to vote for Trump. For a lot of potential Trump voters, this election is still a close call, if not between Biden and Trump, then definitely between Trump and staying home or voting third party. Welcome those folks, don’t insult them.

On the merits of the case – the decision seems reasonable, but I believe we were all better off when the prospect of presidential criminal immunity was still hypothetical rather than concrete. The fault here lies with Biden, Garland, Smith, the district judge, and the D.C. Circuit. By bringing weak, silly charges against Trump and rushing them through the system to try to get a trial before the election, they’ve forced the Court to make a decision on a bad set of facts and an underdeveloped record. We’re all worse off for that. And now the three prog’s “politician in robes” act further weakens the institutions that are actually the bulwark of the republic, if not of “our democracy” itself.

Tell bill barr to shove that bagpipe where the sun dont shine

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf