You had to repeat yourself in your response to Miguel Cervantes, did you think he didn’t understand your weak points. That basically you don’t like her style of presentation and her voice? Or is there more to your dislike?

You be you.

We are not worthy. LOL

As I had benevolent advice for Glick, I also have some for you; if, that is, you are interested in looking less like a bitter troll.

You should allow as they say, a “decent interval” between the appearace of my comments, and your resentful and clumsy attempts at irony.

Readers might then have slightly less reason to conclude you were psychologically damaged and feeding off of alerts.

No. On second thought, it would still be obvious.

I’m not a long video fan myself. But as I said, I increase the speed and find it almost as quick as reading and sometimes get a lot of information that way that isn’t easily available otherwise. The other thing I do is listen with a bluetooth while I’m doing other chores.

DNW:

Not arguing, but Glick is hardly the only YouTuber fitting that Wanted poster.

If I’m curious enough, I feed such YT transcripts into Chat4 for an executive summary.

when you are doing an immoral thing, it doesn’t matter when you do it,
https://twitter.com/SonofHas/status/1789310066111185319

now Eisenkot and the other members of the Blue and White, like Gideon Saar, they are not aesthetically wrong, but wrong on principle if October 7th, did not put in stark relief the stakes that Israel faces they will never learn,

Comming soon the DNW Show.

Carolyn is very clear where did she lose you”

To restate,
“Caroline Glick obviously has important information to convey. …”

But she loses me with,

” … her often rambling and discursive, always adenoidal, hemming and hawing, delivery.”

She should do an outline, to keep herself from straying down expository byways. Or if she thinks the chain of brother in law, to sister’s housekeeper, to her ear style chain of custody is important convey, she could do it more tersely and less in the way of a branching off excursion.

Now, having said this, I am aware that for some people, the narrator is part of the attraction and not merely a conveyance mechanism.

I think television morning shows, and Fox and Friends type presentations as well as some podcasters, or people such as Tim Poole on YouTube reflect a tolerance for that.

To put it in extreme terms not wholy applicable to Glick, you are invited to journey and to explore a conversation with them. Not just put the nickel in and get a printout.

An unfair comparision but I am reminded of the early days of talk topic and public call-in radio.

You were left wanting to shout at callers: “Get to the effen point!”